Hot Stuff, Looking Cool..

It’s nice for a change to have an excuse to write something about science rather than science funding, as a press release appeared today concerning the discovery of a new supercluster by Planck in collaboration with the X-ray observatory XMM-Newton.

The physics behind this new discovery concerns what happens to low-energy photons from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) when they are scattered by extremely hot plasma. Basically, incoming microwave photons collide with highly energetic electrons with the result that they gain energy and so are shifted to shorter wavelengths. The generic name given to this process is inverse Compton scattering, and it can happen in a variety of physical contexts. In cosmology, however, there is a particularly important situation where this process has observable consequences, when CMB photons travel through the extremely hot (but extremely tenuous) ionized gas in a cluster of galaxies. In this setting the process is called the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect.

The observational consequence is slightly paradoxical because what happens is that the microwave background can appears to have a lower temperature (at least for a certain range of wavelengths) in the direction of a galaxy cluster (in which the plasma can have a temperature of 10 million degrees or more). This is because fewer photons reach the observer in the microwave part of the spectrum that would if the cluster did not intervene; the missing ones have been kicked up to higher energies and are therefore not seen at their original wavelength, ergo the CMB looks a little cooler along the line of sight to a cluster than in other directions. To put it another way, what has actually happened is that the hot electrons have distorted the spectrum of the photons passing through it.

Here’s an example of the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect in action as seen by Planck in seven frequency bands:

At low frequencies (in the Rayleigh-Jeans part of the spectrum) the region where the cluster is looks cooler than average, although at high frequencies the effect is reversed.

The magnitude of the temperature distortion produced by a cluster depends on the density of electrons in the plasma pervading the cluster n, the temperature of the plasma T, and the overall size of the cluster; in fact, it’s propotional to n×T integrated along the line of sight through the cluster.

Why this new result is so interesting is that it combines very sensitive measurements of the microwave background temperature pattern  with sensitive measures of the X-ray emission over the same region of the sky. Plasma hot enough to produce a Sunyaev-Zel’dovich distortion of the CMB spectrum will also generate X-rays through a process known as thermal bremsstrahlung.  The power of the X-ray emission depends on the square of the electron density n2 multiplied by the Temperature T.

Since the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich and X-ray measurements depend on different mathematical combinations of the physical properties involved the amalgamation of these two techniques allows astronomers to probe the internal details of the cluster quite precisely.

The example shown here in the top two panels is of a familiar cluster – the Coma Cluster as mapped by Planck (in microwaves) and, by an older X-ray satellite called ROSAT, in X-rays. The two distributions have very similar morphology, strongly suggesting that they have a common origin in the cluster plasma.

The bottom panels show comparisons with the distribution of galaxies as seen in the optical part of the spectrum. You can see that the hot gas I’ve been talking about extends throughout the space between the galaxies. In fact, there is at least as much matter in the hot plasma as there is in the individual galaxies in objects like this, but it’s too hot to be seen in optical light. This could reasonably be called dark matter when it comes to its lack of optical emission, but it’s certainly not dark in X-rays!

The reason why the intracluster plasma is so hot boils down to the strength of the gravitational field in the cluster. Roughly speaking, the hot matter is in virial equilibrium within the gravitational potential generated by the mass distribution within the cluster. Since this is a very deep potential well, electrons move very quickly in response to it. In fact, the galaxies in the cluster are also roughly in virial equilibrium so they too are pulled about by the gravitational field. Galaxies don’t sit around quietly in clusters, they buzz about like bees in a bottle.

Anyway, the new data arising from the combination of Planck and XMM-Newton has revealed not just one cluster, but a cluster of clusters (i.e. a “supercluster”):

It’s early days for Planck, of course, and this is no more than a taster.
The Planck team is currently analysing the data from the first all-sky survey to identify both known and new galaxy clusters for the early Sunyaev-Zel’dovich catalogue, which will be released in January of 2011 as part of the Early Release Compact Source Catalogue. The full Sunyaev-Zel’dovich catalogue may well turn out to be the most enduring legacy of the Planck mission.


Share/Bookmark

10 Responses to “Hot Stuff, Looking Cool..”

  1. Mark McCaughrean's avatar
    Mark McCaughrean Says:

    I’m curious, Peter; I don’t doubt the importance of the Planck Compact Source Catalogue and the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich source list, but why do you think it might be the most important legacy of Planck? More important than the CMB data itself and perhaps the detection of polarisation?

    Not criticising, just curious.

  2. Mark,

    If the cosmological parameters from Planck aren’t significantly different from those found using WMAP (which is quite likely) and if Planck doesn’t find B-mode polarisation (which is also likely) and if there is no significant detection of non-Gaussianity (which is also likely), then I think the S-Z effect will be the most important thing to come out of Planck.

    Entirely subjectively, of course…

    Peter

  3. Mark McCaughrean's avatar
    Mark McCaughrean Says:

    Thanks, Peter. I have no personal scientific stake in this, of course, but am always interested to hear where the community is on the output of our missions.

    While I agree that the cosmological parameters aren’t likely to change fundamentally w.r.t. those found by WMAP, there must be some benefit in beating down the errors, as these then feed forward into things like DE experiments.

    As for B-mode polarisation, I thought that there were actually decent chances of being able to constrain this at low multipoles given the 4-full-sky-survey extended mission of Planck, in part due to increased S/N and in part due to more accurate calibration (e.g. the paper by Efstathiou & Gratton in JCAP in 2009, and the extension case written by the Planck science team). Thoughts?

    In any case, I agree that the S-Z effect data is very valuable, so …

  4. It’s certainly not impossible that Planck will detect B-modes and clearly if it does that will be of major importance. However, that depends on the level that’s actually there (which we don’t know!). I think there’s a good chance it won’t.

    If anyone disagrees with me, perhaps they would care to offer a small wager on the subject?

  5. Steve Warren's avatar
    Steve Warren Says:

    5p says you are wrong. Is that small enough?

  6. a significant number of astronomers expected Spitzer to be a bit of a flop, probably because hopes were calibrated against ISO. many folk had similar reservations about Herschel. in the end, Spitzer and Herschel have surpassed the expectations of even the most optimistic amongst us. i hope the same will be true of Planck, but it’s great that they have the cluster catalogue as a scientific insurance policy.

  7. Mark McCaughrean's avatar
    Mark McCaughrean Says:

    There you go; Mr Ivison is wearing his happy hat today 🙂

    (Peter: in keeping with Steve’s stake, I’ll put 5 eurocents on the table, which’ll add the additional thrill of currency speculation as well)

Leave a comment