Just got back from the St Patrick’s parade in Maynooth to find that I won the Beard of Ireland poll!
Thanks to everyone who voted for me! I’m going to celebrate this evening with a traditional Irish dinner of bacon and cabbage, with a parsley sauce.
Just got back from the St Patrick’s parade in Maynooth to find that I won the Beard of Ireland poll!
Thanks to everyone who voted for me! I’m going to celebrate this evening with a traditional Irish dinner of bacon and cabbage, with a parsley sauce.
Well, it’s St Patrick’s Day, which means I’m on holiday. I’ll soon be toddling off to watch the parade in Maynooth, which passes quite close to my house. In accord with tradition, it’s very cold today – and not a little windy – but at least it’s not raining.
Not many facts are known about the life of St Patrick, but it seems he was born in Britain, probably in the late 4th Century AD, probably somewhere around the Severn Estuary and possibly in Wales. It also appears that he didn’t know any Latin. When a young man, it seems he was captured by Celtic marauders coming up the River Severn and taken as a slave to Ireland. He eventually escaped back to Britain, but returned to Ireland as a missionary and succeeded somehow in converting the Irish people to Christianity.
Or did he? This interesting piece suggests his role was of lesser importance than many think. On the other hand, if even a fraction of what is said about him is true, then he must have been a very remarkable man.
However it happened, Ireland was the first country to be converted to Christianity that had never been part of the Roman Empire. That made a big difference to the form of the early Irish Church. The local Celtic culture was very loose and decentralized. There were no cities, large buildings, roads or other infrastructure. Life revolved around small settlements and farms. When wars were fought they were generally over livestock or grazing land. The church that grew in this environment was quite different from that of continental Europe. It was not centralized, revolved around small churches and monasteries, and lacked the hierarchical structure of the Roman Church. Despite these differences, Ireland was well connected with the rest of the Christian world.
Irish monks – and the wonderful illuminated manuscripts they created – spread across the continent, starting with Scotland and Britain. Thanks to the attentions of the Vikings few of these works survive but the wonderful Lindisfarne Gospels, dating from somewhere in the 8th Century were almost certainly created by Irish monks. The Book of Kells was probably created in Scotland by Irish Monks.
The traffic wasn’t entirely one-way however. A while ago I saw a fascinating documentary about the Fadden More Psalter. This is a leather-bound book of Psalms found in a peat bog in 2006, which is of similar age to the Lindisfarne Gospels. It took years of painstaking restoration work to recover at least part of the text (much of which was badly degraded), but the leather binding turned out to hold a particularly fascinating secret: it was lined with papyrus. The only other books from the same period with the same structure that are known are from the Coptic Church in Egypt. That doesn’t mean that whoever owned the Fadden More Psalter had actually been to Egypt, of course. It is much more this book made its way to Ireland via a sort of relay race. On the other hand, it does demonstrate that international connections were probably more extensive than you might have thought.
Anyway, back to St Patrick’s Day.
Saint Patrick’s Day is celebrated on March 17th, the reputed date of his death in 461 AD. Nobody really knows where St Patrick was born,, and the when of his birth isn’t known either.
In any case, it wasn’t until the 17th Century that Saint Patrick’s feast day was placed on the universal liturgical calendar in the Catholic Church. Indeed, St Patrick has never been formally canonized. In the thousand years that passed any memory of the actual date of his birth was probably lost, so the choice of date was probably influenced by other factors, specifically the proximity of the Spring Equinox (which is this year on Saturday March 20th).
The early Christian church in Ireland incorporated many pre-Christian traditions that survived until roughly the 12th century, including the ancient festival of Ēostre (or Ostara), the goddess of spring associated with the spring equinox after whom Easter is named. During this festival, eggs were used a symbol of rebirth and the beginning of new life and a hare or rabbit was the symbol of the goddess and fertility. In turn the Celtic people of Ireland probably adapted their own beliefs to absorb much older influences dating back to the stone age. St Patrick’s Day and Easter therefore probably both have their roots in prehistoric traditions around the Spring Equinox, although the direct connection has long been lost.
Lá Fhéile Pádraig sona daoibh go léir!
As I predicted in last weekend’s update of activity at the Open Journal of Astrophysics, this morning I was able to publish the 500th paper at the Open Journal of Astrophysics. The overlay is here:

The authors of this paper are Harry Desmond of the Institute of Cosmology & Gravitation at the University of Portsmouth (UK) and Joseph Ramsey of the Philosophy Department at Carnegie Mellon University in the USA.You can find the officially accepted final version on arXiv here.
Congratulations to the authors – as a prize they each receive a year’s free subscription to the Open Journal of Astrophysics.
P.S. If you’re interested we published our 250th paper just over a year ago. If we keep this rate up we’ll have published over 1,000 papers by the time I retire…

So the Six Nations is over for another year. This year’s competition has been remarkable, with many superb games on view not least the final match last night in which France beat England 48:46 with the last kick of the game, a penalty taken by Thomas Ramos. I recall a similar ending two years ago, when Ramos kicked France to a 31:30 victory. That victory gave France the Championship. Congratulations to them for winning a cracking tournament.
At the start of the competition the talk was of a French Grand Slam, but that dream was ended in comprehensive fashion by Scotland’s victory over them last week. Scotland visited Lansdowne Road in Dublin yesterday for the afternoon game and must have been high in confidence but were outplayed. After that match Ireland were top of the table, but would be caught by France if France beat England. Ireland rugby fans found themselves in the unusual position of wanting England to win. England certainly gave it a heck of a good go, playing at a much higher tempo than they had managed in any other match, but fell just short, so Ireland had to settle for second place. The result confirmed the view of many in Ireland that one should never rely on the English.
It was a great game to watch, except for the bizarre choice of team colours. Who decided to allow a team in very pale blue shirts with white shorts and socks to play against a team in white shirts, white shorts and white socks? Watching on TV, it was at times impossible to tell the teams apart!
Anyway, coming second was a good end result for Ireland, considering their heavy defeat by France in the opening match of the tournament. Andy Farrell demonstrated his coaching skills by picking his team up after that, especially huge performances against England at Twickenham and Scotland at Landsdowne Road. Though they did not win the Six Nations, at least they took the Triple Crown.
(The intransitive nature of sport was well illustrated in this competition: France beat Ireland, Scotland beat France and Ireland beat Scotland, etc…)
The other match yesterday was between Wales and Italy. I was happy to see a Wales victory at last, as they had no luck at all in this competition. They were particularly unlucky to lose to Scotland. James Botham dropped a clanger that led to the try that let Scotland back into a game Wales were leading, which was unfortunate, but I think the next and winning try for Scotland should have stood – there was an infringement at the ruck preceding it. Anyway, yesterday they didn’t really need luck: they started out like they meant business and raced to a 21-0 lead at half-time against an Italian side that looked very tired after its efforts last week in beating England. Italy recovered somewhat in the second half, and had chances to really get back into contention, but Wales ran out convincing winners 31-17.
Despite their victory yesterday – their first in three years in the Six Nations – Wales finished last. I am reliably informed that “wooden spoon” in Welsh is “llwy bren”. Still, they did produce the moment of the tournament with Rhys Carré (“The Fastest Prop in the West”) scoring a stunning try against Ireland.
I think many people thought France would win this year, and that Wales would be last, but how many would have predicted that England would finish 5th?
Reflecting on this year’s Championship I realised why I love it so much. Since the Six Nations involves a relatively small number of games – five for each team – there is real jeopardy in each fixture. That makes it different from longer league competitions in which there is more time to recover from a defeat and gives an edge-of-the-seat feeling to many matches. That is even more so when all the teams are strong. It is great for the competition to see Scotland playing as well as they did against France and England and Italy proving themselves much more resilient than in previous seasons. We just need Wales to emerge from the doldrums to make it a genuine six-way contest.


Yesterday evening found me once again at the National Concert Hall in Dublin for a programme of music played by National Symphony Orchestra Ireland, this time conducted by Principal Conductor Designate, Alexander Shelley, who takes over fully for the 2026/7 season. He took the opportunity afforded by the break between the first two numbers needed to bring the piano onstage, to introduce himself to the audience which made a pleasant change from having to watch in silence as all the chairs and desks were moved around.
The programme began with the exuvberant Short Ride in a Fast Machine by American composer John Adams which – believe it or not – was written forty years ago, in 1986. It is an exuberant piece based on interrelated rhythmic figures which is great fun to listen to and an ideal warm-up exercise for the orchestra.
The piano having been hauled into position, it was time to welcome Canadian pianist Jaeden Izik-Dzurko (who has Hungarian and Ukrainian ancestry) for the Piano Concerto No. 3 by Sergei Rachmaninov. When the soloist walked on stage I was struck by how young he looked. He is, in fact, 27 but looks younger. Still, I’ve reached an age when most people look very young. Rachmaninov’s Piano Concerto No. 3 is a monster of a piece – very long for a piano concerto – and also very difficult, with some fierce cadenzas. For all its reputation as a finger-breaker, it does have some lovely melodies in it. Rachmaninov himself realized he had created bit of a beast and cut some of the toughest bits for early performances, but nowadays we tend to hear the whole original score, as we did last night. I thought Jaeden Izik-Dzurko not only coped admirably with its technical demands but also conveyed its lyrical aspects very tenderly. It was a very impressive performance. The audience at the NCH obviously agreed. A standing ovation greeted him at the end, though he looked almost embarrassed by such an effusive reaction.
After the interval wine break we had a concert performance the complete score for Igor Stravinsky’s ballet The Firebird. This is a thrilling piece, involving a huge orchestra, numbering about a hundred musicians, and stunning orchestration. The Firebird is a tour de force: intricate but vividly coloured, full of excitement and colour and NSOI played it with great passion and aplomb. A really brilliant performance.
There was an electronic sign above the orchestra for The Firebird explaining what would be going on in the ballet as the various sections of the music were played. I found that an unwelcome and slightly annoying distraction, but it didn’t detract significantly from the performance. There was thunderous applause at the end of the concert but, it being quite a long concert, I couldn’t stay for all the ovations as I had to leave to catch the train home.
It’s Saturday once more, so it’s time for another update of activity at the Open Journal of Astrophysics. Since the last update we have published a further four papers, bringing the number in Volume 9 (2026) to 51 and the total so far published by OJAp up to 499. I hoped we would reach 500 this week, but that milestone will have to wait. We have however passed the 50 mark for this year, so we have now published more papers so far in 2026 than we published in all of 2023.
I will continue to include the posts made on our Mastodon account (on Fediscience) to encourage you to visit it. Mastodon is a really excellent service, and a more than adequate replacement for X/Twitter (which nobody should be using); these announcements also show the DOI for each paper.
The first paper to report this week is “Effect of temperature on the structure of porous dust aggregates formed by coagulation” by Lucas Kolanz, Davide Lazzati and Job Guidos (Oregon State University, USA). This study uses 3D simulations to examine how temperature and monomer size distribution affect the structure of dust formed in supernovae at high redshift. It was published on Monday March 9th in the folder Astrophysics of Galaxies.
The overlay is here:

You can find the officially accepted version on arXiv here and the announcement on Fediverse here:
The second paper for this week is “Intrinsic alignment of disks and ellipticals across hydrodynamical simulations” by M. L. van Heukelum and N. E. Chisari (Utrecht University, The Netherlands). This is one of two papers published on Tuesday 10th March. This one is in the folder Astrophysics of Galaxies: it examines the inconsistent correlations between galaxy positions and shapes, comparing disk and elliptical shapes in different simulations. The results highlight the importance of sub-grid physics at non-linear scales.Abstractfor Intrinsic alignment of disks and ellipticals across hydrodynamical simulations.
The overlay for this one is here:
The official version of the paper can be found on arXiv here and the Fediverse announcement here:
Next one up is “A Comparison of Galacticus and COZMIC WDM Subhalo Populations” by Jack Lonergan (U. Southern California), Andrew Benson (Carnegie Observatories) and Xiaolong Du (UCLA), all based in the USA. This paper was published on 10th March 2026 in the folder Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics. The study compares warm dark matter subhalo populations using the Galacticus model and COZMIC simulations, finding both can reliably reproduce these distributions, with Galacticus offering computational efficiency.Abstractfor A Comparison of Galacticus and COZMIC WDM Subhalo Populations.
The overlay for this one is here:
The final, accepted version can be found on arXiv here and the Mastodon announcement is here:
And finally for this week we have “Simulation-Based Inference for Probabilistic Galaxy Detection and Deblending” by Ismael Mendoza (U. Maryland, USA) and 7 others (all based in the USA) on behalf of the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration. This was published on Thursday March 12th in the folder Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics. The article introduces the Bayesian Light Source Separator (BLISS), for detecting and measuring galaxy properties in wide-field cosmological surveys. BLISS demonstrates improved performance, particularly for faint and blended objects.
The overlay is here:

The finally accepted version of this paper can be found here and the Mastodon announcement is here:
And that concludes this week’s update.
P.S. Thank you once again to the many people who have responded to the latest call for editors. I’ve been sending out invitations and getting people onboard as quickly as I can, but I still have a number to get to, so please bear with me!
Today (Friday 13th March 2026) is 40 years to the day since the Giotto spacecraft started to send back images of Halley’s comet;it reached its closest approach on 14th March 1986. This guest post by my colleague in the Department of Physics at Maynooth, Dr Emma Whelan, was written to mark this anniversary and the connection with the eminent Irish astrophysicist Susan McKenna-Lawlor.
–o–
This week, as I mull over the importance of International Women’s Day, I am also thinking about the significance to Irish women scientists of the 40th anniversary of the historic flyby of Halley’s Comet by the European Space Agency’s first deep space mission Giotto. On 14 March 1986, Giotto passed within about 600 km of the nucleus of Halley’s comet at a relative speed of roughly 68 km/s. Despite being bombarded by dust particles in the comet’s coma, the spacecraft successfully returned unprecedented data. Maynooth University space scientist and former Head of the Department of Experimental Physics, Prof. Susan McKenna-Lawlor, made a key contribution to this mission and was the Principal Investigator for Giotto’s instrument, the Energetic Particle Analyser otherwise known as EPONA. EPONA was designed to measure high-energy charged particles in the vicinity of Halley’s comet. By analysing the flux and energy of these particles, the experiment helped scientists understand the interaction between the solar wind and a comet.
Giotto represents not only a major milestone in the history of ESA, but also an important moment in the history of the contribution of Irish Women to the field of Astrophysics and the involvement of Maynooth University women scientists, in Space Science. The Department of Physics now has a thriving Physics with Astrophysics degree (MH204) with many women (students, technicians, administrators and academics) making important contributions to the success of this programme. Prof. McKenna-Lawlor’s leadership in developing and operating the instrument represented one of Ireland’s earliest direct contributions to an international space mission. Her work helped establish Ireland’s reputation in space science and encouraged future Irish participation in European and international space research, especially by young women who were inspired by seeing an Irish woman succeeding in a field where women were very rarely visible.
Launched in July 1985, Giotto’s primary objective was to encounter and study Halley’s Comet during its 1986 return to the inner Solar System. ESA have compiled a movie of its encounter which can be viewed here. At the time, Halley’s Comet was the most famous comet known, having been observed for centuries, yet very little was understood about comets and in particular the detailed structure of their nuclei and the physical processes occurring as they approach the Sun. Giotto provided the first close-up measurements of a comet and fundamentally changed scientific understanding of these Solar System bodies. One of Giotto’s most significant results was the first direct image of a comet’s nucleus. The images revealed that Halley’s nucleus is a dark, irregular object roughly 15 km long, far darker than expected, reflecting only a small fraction of sunlight. This confirmed the long-standing “dirty snowball” model proposed by astronomer Fred Whipple, in which a comet consists of volatile ices mixed with dust and rocky material. Giotto’s observations also showed jets of gas and dust erupting from localised regions on the nucleus, demonstrating that cometary activity is driven by sunlight heating specific surface areas rather than uniformly across the surface.
In addition to imaging, Giotto carried instruments designed to study the plasma, dust, and the energetic particle environment around the comet. These measurements revealed the complex interaction between the comet’s expanding atmosphere and the solar wind. Scientists were able to observe the formation of structures such as bow shocks and ion tails, helping to explain how cometary material becomes ionised and carried away through space. These results provided critical insights into the physics of cometary comae and their interaction with the heliosphere. The results from EPONA were crucial in identifying regions where energetic particles were produced by the interaction between the solar wind and the cometary plasma. These measurements contributed to the understanding of shock waves and particle acceleration processes occurring near the comet.

Prof. McKenna-Lawlor (pictured above, in 2017) was born in Dublin in 1935 and received a BSc, MSc and PhD from University College Dublin. She was a research assistant at The Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies and became a lecturer at the Department of Experimental Physics in Maynooth in the early 1970s. She has received numerous awards including the Russian Tsiokovsky Gold Medal for “Outstanding Contributions to Cosmonautics” in 1988. She has written several books on the history of Irish Astronomy including “Whatever Shines Should be Observed” that documents the pioneering contributions of five 19th-century Irish women to astronomy, photography, and science. The title is derived from the motto of the Royal Astronomical Society. In more recent times she was involved with ESA’s Rosetta mission which landed its Philae probe on comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko on November 12, 2014.
I’ve just got time this evening to pass on news that the Chair of the Parliamentary Select Committee looking at he current STFC debacle (see this account), Chi Onwurah, has responded to the events in extremely frank terms. Here is an excerpt:

The full response – which is definitely well worth reading because it doesn’t pull any punches – can be found here:
Such documents are not usually so forthright!
This isn’t by any means the end of the story of this fiasco, but it is certainly a positive sign that it is being taken very seriously in political circles. Credit is due not only to all those who attended and gave evidence to the Committee – Catherine Heymans, Jon Butterworth et al – but also to those who lobbied behind the scenes.
Horizont, Gipfelpunkt und Atmosphäre by Paul Klee (1925, watercolor and graphite on paper, 37.1 x 27 cm, Guggenheim, New York)