Cosmology and the Constants of Nature
Just a brief post to advertise a very interesting meeting coming up in Cambridge:
–o–
Cosmology and the Constants of Nature
DAMTP, University of Cambridge
Monday, 17 March 2014 at 09:00 – Wednesday, 19 March 2014 at 15:00 (GMT)
Cambridge, United Kingdom
The Constants of Nature are quantities, whose numerical values we know with the greatest experimental accuracy – but about the rationale for those values, we have the greatest ignorance. We might also ask if they are indeed constant in space and time, and investigate whether their values arise at random or are uniquely determined by some deep theory.
This mini-series of talks is part of the joint Oxford-Cambridge programme on the Philosophy of Cosmology which aims to introduce philosophers of physics to fundamental problems in cosmology and associated areas of high-energy physics.
The talks are aimed at philosophers of physics but should also be of interest to a wide range of cosmologists. Speakers will introduce the physical constants that define the standard model of particle physics and cosmology together with the data that determine them, describe observational programmes that test the constancy of traditional ʽconstantsʼ, including the cosmological constant, and discuss how self-consistent theories of varying constants can be formulated.
Speakers:
John Barrow, University of Cambridge
John Ellis, King’s College London
Pedro Ferreira, University of Oxford
Joao Magueijo, Imperial College, London
Thanu Padmanabhan, IUCAA, Pune
Martin Rees, University of Cambridge
John Webb, University of New South Wales, Sydney
Registration is free and includes morning coffee and lunch. Participants are requested to register at the conference website where the detailed programme of talks can be found:
http://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/cosmology-and-the-constants-of-nature-registration-9356261831
For enquiries about this event please contact Margaret Bull at mmp@maths.cam.ac.uk
Follow @telescoperShare this:
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Related
This entry was posted on January 20, 2014 at 12:10 pm and is filed under The Universe and Stuff with tags Constants of Nature, Cosmology, High Energy Physics, John Barrow, philosophy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
January 20, 2014 at 4:42 pm
I’d like to go but I’m not eligible either. John Webb et al have looked at variations of the fine-structure constant, which is a running constant, see NIST. People tend to say α=e²/4πε0ħc varies because effective charge e varies, forgetting about conservation of charge and forgetting that virtual particles are not real particles. When the effect of that conserved charge varies it’s because the surrounding space varies, so ε0 and/or ħ and/or c have to vary, and of course c = √(1/ε0μ0). Joao Magueijo will doubtless be talking about the varying speed of light, which I back because the coordinate speed of light varies with gravitational potential. Only it was slower in the early universe, so expansion looked rapid, ergo inflation. John Barrow is on side AFAIK, and Martin Rees probably isn’t and will talk about the “fine tuned” constants and the goldilocks multiverse. I don’t know about the other guys. But it sounds like real interesting stuff.
January 20, 2014 at 11:32 pm
It’d be nice if they had some new (post-2010) data about alpha to talk about though 🙂