BICEP2DAY
Well, it’s official that this afternoon’s announcement of a “major discovery” is going to be from the BICEP team, and it specifically concerns the BICEP2 CMB telescope experiment. I’ve just got back to Sussex (after a weekend in Cardiff) and will be following the events in among other things I have to do before going off to give a lecture at 5pm GMT.
The schedule of events is as follows: there will be a special webcast presenting the first results from the BICEP2 CMB telescope. The webcast will begin with a presentation for scientists 10:45-11:30 EDT, followed by a news conference 12:00-1:00 EDT.
You can join the webcast from the link at http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/news_conferences.html
Papers and data products will be available at 10:45 EDT from http://bicepkeck.org/
EDT is four hours behind Greenwich Mean Time so the webcast will begin at 14:45 GMT, i.e. in about half an hour.
In the mean time, for those of you wondering what these BICEPS are all about, here is a useful graphic in which a Harvard astrophysicist demonstrates the possibilities:
LIVE BLOG:
14:36 The press conference server has gone down. There’s no truth in the rumour that ex-members of the Clover collaboration have sabotaged it.
14:42 There’s a grave danger that this press conference will run into tea time.
14:45 The BICEP2 papers are now live at http://bicepkeck.org/
14:48 Straight to the headline: R=0.2 (+0.07, -0.05) with R=0 rejected at about 7 sigma, if you like things stated in such terms…
14:53 Here’s the crucial graph. Results a bit higher than the expected signal at l in range 200-300?
15:06 The news avalanche has started, e.g. here at the BBC, but there is some concern about the shape of the spectrum.
15:10 I’m not getting anything from the press conference, so may have missed important details. It seems to me though that there’s a significant possibility of some of the polarization signal in E and B not being cosmological. This is a very interesting result, but I’d prefer to reserve judgement until it is confirmed by other experiments.
15:35 Despite the press hype there’s still some scepticism among cosmologists arising from the strange-looking shape of the spectrum. I’m not convinced myself. Anyway, I have to sign off now in order to prepare a lecture..
16:20 Back-of-the-envelope time: if the result is correct then the inflationary energy scale is about 2×1016 GeV. That’s just two orders of magnitude below the Planck scale…
18:19 Returned from my 5pm Theoretical Physics lecture. Couldn’t resist spending 30 minutes talking about BICEP2, though I did tell them it’s not in the examination.
18:25 Main points of controversy:
- there seems to be evidence of leakage of temperature into polarization (lines in Fig. 5);
- there’s an excess in the B-B spectrum at l~250 shown above;
- there’s an excess at low l in the E-E spectrum
- there’s a deficit at low l in the cross-correlation with Keck
There may be a connection between 1. and 2.-4. If 2.-4 are real then they may be evidence of something interesting that requires more than a straightforward modification of inflation (such as might include just a running of the spectral index).
18:35 Other controversy: why has this result been announced before the paper has been published or even peer-reviewed?


March 17, 2014 at 3:06 pm
Well you have me dying to find out even though I don’t think I will understand one word of the announcement when you explain it. I do get the one from the Harvard guy, but is he just being condescending :)?
March 17, 2014 at 3:21 pm
Reblogged this on thecuriousastronomer and commented:
Breaking news on the apparent confirmation of Cosmic inflation
March 18, 2014 at 1:41 pm
[…] (CMB). In case the big words coming to you from the BBC, the Guardian, Nature, the New York Times, Peter Coles, Sean Carroll, roughly 500 twittering astronomers and Andrei Linde himself have not yet convinced […]
April 10, 2018 at 11:35 am
[…] gone ahead it might well have detected the same signal found five years later by BICEP2, which was announced in 2014. It would however, have had the same difficulty as BICEP2 in distinguishing the primordial signal […]
March 17, 2021 at 10:54 pm
[…] I have a short gap in my schedule today so I thought I would use it to post a short note about the BICEP2 results announced to great excitement on Monday. […]
October 27, 2021 at 7:26 pm
[…] (reaching almost 10,000 hits per day at one point). The reason for that was the announcement of the “discovery” of primordial gravitational waves by the BICEP2 experiment. Despite all the hype at the time I wasn’t convinced. This is what I […]