Crisis at NASA

The scientific community has been waiting for several weeks to find out precisely how heavily the Trump/Musk axe would fall on the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); this article reveals the shocking scale of the proposed cuts.

Under the proposal, NASA’s Science Mission Directorate (SMD) would receive almost a 50% reduction in its Budget. Within the individual SMD Divisions:

  • Planetary Science would have its budget cut from the current level of $2,717 Million to $1,929 Million;
  • Earth Science would see a cut from the current budget level of $2,195 Million to $1,033 Million;
  • Astrophysics would decrease from its current level of $1,530 Million to $487 Million;
  • Heliophysics budget would decrease from its current level of $805 M to $455 M.

It’s very bad news all round for NASA science, but the worst hit is Astrophysics (which includes cosmology) where the proposed cut is about two-thirds, which would be truly devastating. According to the American Astronomical Society,

The proposed cut to the astrophysics budget is likely to result in the cancellation of the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, a Great Observatory that would revolutionize our understanding of dark matter and dark energy while also detecting hundreds of thousands of planets in other solar systems. As the Roman Space Telescope is already fully assembled and on budget for a launch in two years, a cancellation of the mission would be a significant waste of taxpayer dollars. 

The Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope (formerly known as WFIRST) is in many ways complementary to Euclid, though it will survey a smaller area of sky it has an telescope twice the diameter of Euclid so will reach fainter magnitudes. It has been threatened before, in Trump’s previous administration, but it survived. It is not clear that it will do so again as the current composition of Congress is not weighted favourably.

Those of us outside the United States can do little, but in case anyone reading this is in America the AAS has an Action Alert for you to contact your representative(s) to vote against the proposal.

6 Responses to “Crisis at NASA”

  1. Ted Bunn's avatar
    Ted Bunn Says:

    In a normal year, I would urge people not to worry too much about this: typically, the President’s budget proposal has relatively little bearing on what Congress eventually appropriates. Members of Congress want money to flow to their districts, so when the President suggests deep cuts, Congress usually restores them, at least to some level.

    But of course we are in a year that is very far from normal, and many members of Congress (all of the Republicans, and many Democrats as well) are showing shameful cowardice in declining to stand up to the president. So yes, we should all be extremely worried.

    I’m pretty confident in my two senators, but I’ve been calling them fairly regularly to urge them to stand up for what’s right. I’ll call them about this.

    • Ted Bunn's avatar
      Ted Bunn Says:

      (I forgot to say “and my House representative” after “my two senators.” I’m confident about her too, but I’ll still call.)

  2. I thought I had posted about this in a reply to your previous post about visiting the US. But it did not appear – strange. Anyway, the UK solar physics community has created a letter of support for people to sign in support of our US colleagues. I signed it but doubt very much it will have any impact.

  3. […] von heute (mehr) und gestern. Auch Artikel zur ISS von heute und vorgestern und zur NASA-Krise von gestern (mehr und mehr) – und das kurze Paper „Are there Spectral Features in the MIRI/LRS […]

Leave a comment