AGP Matters
Well, just made it back to Cardiff following the (hopefully) final meeting of the Astronomy Grants Panel (AGP) for this year’s round at the Science and Technology Facilities Council HQ in Swindon. It’s been a difficult process – though perhaps not quite as difficult as last year’s round which was completely overloaded with applications. I struggled a bit extra this year because I seem to have caught some sort of nasty bug during my recent travels. No doubt I’ve now infected the rest of the panel via coughing and spluttering too…
Anyway, we got through the business at hand, which basically involved merging two ranked lists produced by the sub-panels to produce an overall priority order for the proposals received. What happens with this list now is that the good folk at STFC carefully calculate the costs of each proposal as they work down through the list and keep going until the money runs out. We don’t know for sure at this stage where the line will fall, but it’s pretty clear that some very good proposals won’t make it. That’s the way it is. There just isn’t enough money to fund all the best research.
I suppose that’s why I always have mixed feelings at the end of an AGP round. It’s good to see the process in operation, because it convinces one that everyone concerned is doing their best to achieve a fair outcome, but it’s very sad that some proposals will fall just short with potentially terrible consequences for those whose livelihoods depend on STFC funding. This accounts for the not inconsiderable quantity of gallows humour displayed by AGP members.
Of course the AGP doesn’t actually award grants. It makes recommendations which are then endorsed (or not) by the STFC Science Board. So although we’ve now done our job, it will take a while until the formal grant announcements start appearing, in November probably.
Anyway, I’ve been on the panel for 3 years now, which is the normal sentence term for an AGP member, so I have the feeling I might be “rotated” off after this round, whereupon it will be up to some other mug esteemed researcher to take my place performing this thankless task valuable bit of community service.
September 20, 2012 at 7:36 pm
Of course “thankless task” and “valuable bit of community service” are not mutually exclusive. (I suppose “esteemed researcher” and “mug” are not, either…)
September 20, 2012 at 8:36 pm
peter:
unfortunately i think you displayed too much competence and even-handedness not to be invited^* back (if not immediately, then probably fairly soon).
ian
[^* andy and kim’s invitations are of the kind which you decline at your own risk]
September 21, 2012 at 8:57 am
The way out of AGP is to show incompetence and strong opinions. University committees will beckon instead.
September 21, 2012 at 9:00 am
I tried my best…
September 21, 2012 at 4:26 pm
I know.. So did I, and I passed Ian’s incompetence test! Freedom!