GCSE and A level results: Three steps to make things better

Too busy for a proper post today so I’m going to reblog this interesting reflection on recent examination results from Protons for Breakfast. I had a croissant myself.

 

Michael de Podesta's avatarProtons for Breakfast

As my own children approach the year in which they will sit GCSE and A level exams, the annual brouhaha  over exam results feels a bit more personal. And my anger over the betrayal of students and the governments abnegation of responsibility in this field grows more intense.

“It wasn’t like this when I were a lad ..”. No really: it wasn’t. Back in the 60’s and 70’s, the results were always the same: for example the top 7.5% (I think that was the number) received an A, the next n% received a B and so on. This approach served to discriminate amongst the candidates. But it didn’t register whether students knew more or less than in previous years.

Then exams were changed in many ways simultaneously. Syllabuses were reduced, continuous assessment introduced, exam boards became wholly-owned by book publishers, and ‘absolute’ marking became the norm. The result…

View original post 377 more words

One Response to “GCSE and A level results: Three steps to make things better”

  1. Anton Garrett's avatar
    Anton Garrett Says:

    It’s simple: you learn about the pupils from their answers, you learn about the system from the questions.

Leave a comment