Are You in The Weights?

Yesterday I found out about a site called intheweights.com , which reveals which people are “stored” in the weights of large language models. Those “weights” are billions of numerical values by which these AI models encode their knowledge. If you show up in them, the model considered you relevant enough during training to recall without tools such as web search.

The site queries several models to figure out who a specific person is, combines the results, and assigns a strength score.  According to the leaderboard, the current maximum strength score is 998, awarded too a person called Charlize Theron (of whom I have never heard); number Two is Rudyard Kipling, apparently. I’m surprised the top isn’t Taylor Swift. I guess these weights change with time too.

Being a vain person I typed in my name and found this:

The only reason I can think of that I score so highly is all that scraping of this blog site over the last year or so. The weights are obviously influenced by how much material there is available online by or about the person.

Anyway, give it a try. Are you In The Weights?

P.S. A number of other “Peter Coles” characters are also listed under my entry, some of them as far as I can see totally fictitious.

13 Responses to “Are You in The Weights?”

  1. Chris Chaloner's avatar
    Chris Chaloner Says:

    I don’t appear at all – should I be offended or relieved? Mind you, there are 3 others with my name – a golfer, a rugby player, and an actor

  2. Cormac ORaifeartaigh's avatar
    Cormac ORaifeartaigh Says:

    Peter!! Charlize Theron is a great actress, epic Ice Queen in Snow White and the Hunter! Cormac

    Sent from Outlook for iOShttps://aka.ms/o0ukef ________________________________

  3. Francis's avatar
    Francis Says:

    Well that was interesting. I had a score of 111, and in top 55%. Surprised I was in it at all as I am not on any social media. However what was really interesting is that it said there is another Francis Keenan who is a professor of astrophysics at Leicester. A big surprise to me – so I looked at the Leicester website and no one with that name is listed……

  4. @telescoper.blog I ran this on myself and confirmed – once again – that LLMs offer little more than the averaging of raw data across the internet, including wrong and biased information. I’ve never been an editor, and it missed the other 60% of my career, not to mention the rest of my fully online, nonprofessional life.
    #stayhuman

  5. @telescoper.blog I smell BS. Apparently I'm the co-founder of Unistellar now!

    • @hannorein Worked for me, but the results were different depending on searching with our without “Dr.” before my name. Without, it had one false bit of information (association with a blog of a former colleague), with it flagged 4 possible “hallucinations”, which were indeed wrong (or other people by the same name). @telescoper.blog

  6. Ted Bunn's avatar
    Ted Bunn Says:

    I show up as the real me and also as various people who don’t exist (an American football player, for instance).

    • telescoper's avatar
      telescoper Says:

      I also show up as an English cricketer who I’m sure doesn’t exist. The only cricketers I can find with the surname Coles are Matt and James.

  7. Anton Garrett's avatar
    Anton Garrett Says:

    I’ve never seen a film with Charlize Theron in, but I remember her bowdlerised striptease ads for Dior.

  8. John Simmons's avatar
    John Simmons Says:

    I thought had a remarkably good score but it was an American football player.

Leave a comment