What happens if you ask people to pick a number `at random’ between 1 and 100?

I saw this circulating on Twitter and thought I would share it here; it was originally posted on reddit.

The graph shows the results obtained when 6750 people were asked to pick an integer `at random’ between 1 and 100. You might naively expect the histogram to be flat (give or take some Poisson errors), consistent with each number having the same probability of being picked, but there are clearly some numbers that are more likely to be chosen than a constant probability would imply. The most popular picks are in fact 69, 77 and 7 (in descending order).

It’s well known amongst purveyors of conjuring tricks and the like that if you ask people to pick a number between 1 and 10, far more people choose 7 than any other number. And I suppose 77 is an extension of that. More interestingly, however, the top result implies that, given the choice, more people seem to prefer a 69 to anything else…

Anyway, it proves a point that I’ve made more than a few times on this blog, namely that people generally have a very poor idea of what randomness is and are particularly bad at making random choices or generating random sequences.

P.S. Please direct any criticism of the graph (e.g. why the x-axis goes up to 104 or why the x-values are given to two decimal places) to the reddit page…

17 Responses to “What happens if you ask people to pick a number `at random’ between 1 and 100?”

  1. knudjahnke Says:

    And why is 42 not above average? What kind of strange sample was this?

  2. Some very unpopular choices in there, too.

  3. When I was in my late teens I asked myself exactly this question. Wthout actually doing a sample, I decided that the *least* likely number would be 83. So I selected that as the number for my football uniform shirt, which I still have! Looks like I was pretty much on the money!

    • telescoper Says:

      On what basis did you make this decision?

      • Large prime, not associated with any popular concept or common idea. No special relationship between digits (not sequential, not factors, …). Seemed like the most boring number I could think of.

  4. Anton Garrett Says:

    Poor old 34. I feel sorry for it.

  5. Michel C. Says:

    Quote “Anyway, it proves a point that I’ve made more than a few times on this blog, namely that people generally have a very poor idea of what randomness is and are particularly bad at making random choices or generating random sequences.”

    It is because ‘randomness’ is the fruit of our imagination. There is no such a thing in nature…

  6. It would be interesting to see this graph broken down by gender.

  7. Toffeenose Says:

    It would be particularly interesting to see the gender breakout for those who selected 69…..

  8. This is very interesting!
    I was looking for ‘the most picked number between 1-10’ but this works too 🙂

  9. Debmalya Chakraborty Says:

    What happens if you ask people to pick a number `at random’ between 1 and 12?

  10. Well of course redditors will pick 69. I wonder if that is the case outside of the internet, though.

    • It would not have been… except word travels fast and there isn’t that many people left on earth that haven’t been influenced. 

      Id have expected 8 to be a higher picked number a long time ago because if you lay it down it becomes infinite.

      This also depends on the group of people asked because the less you know, the more random the number picked will be.

  11. Jeanee Little Says:

    I did not know that

Leave a comment