The Challenges of Large Collaborations in STEM

There’s a new paper on the arXiv by Kamiel Janssens and Michiko Ueda that addresses some of the challenges that arise for people working in large STEM collaborations. Although the sample they use is drawn from gravitational-wave collaborations I think many of the patterns that emerge will also apply elsewhere, e.g. in the Euclid Consortium.

Here is the abstract:

Large-scale international scientific collaborations are increasingly common in the field of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics). However, little is known about the well-being of the members participating in these `big science’ collaborations, which can present unique challenges due to the scale of their work. We conducted a survey among members of three large, international collaborations in the field of gravitational-wave astrophysics in the summer of 2021. Our objective was to investigate how career stage, job insecurity and minority status are associated with reported levels of depressive symptoms as well as the desire to leave academia. We found that early-career scientists and certain minoritized groups reported significantly higher levels of depressive symptoms compared to senior members or those who do not consider themselves as a member of minoritized groups. Furthermore, relatively young members, staff scientists/engineers, and those experiencing high levels of job insecurity and lack of recognition were more likely to frequently consider leaving academia. Our findings suggest that improving recognition for personal contributions to collaborative work and providing clearer job perspectives could be two key factors in enhancing the well-being of young scientists and reducing the potential outflow from academia.

arXiv:2308.05107

I would like to add a personal note. When I was an early-career researcher in cosmology I was for the most part given a free hand to work on whatever I wanted to do. My first papers were either sole author or with one or two others, being people I’d met and wanted to collaborate with. Nowadays many opportunities – indeed, most – for postdocs are associated with very large teams into which one just has to fit. The work is also highly directed with little choice of what to do, and it is harder to individuals to shine even if the team is well managed, and not all senior scientists in such collaborations have good leadership skills. Theoretical astrophysics is challenging enough but sometimes the really difficult thing is the behaviour of other people!

I’m not saying that this way of working is necessarily bad, just that it is very different from what I experienced. It does not therefore surprise me to hear that many, especially younger, people struggle in the current environment and why it is important for large collaborations to do the best they can to help. I think part of that involves us oldies recognizing that things are very different now from what they were like back in our day.

3 Responses to “The Challenges of Large Collaborations in STEM”

  1. John Simmons Says:

    Yes, stating the obvious I think there would be a strong tendency for junior/ early career people to be assigned “donkey work”, number crunching tasks that junior software engineers would do. It doesn’t seem the type of research can build a career from.

  2. John Simmons Says:

    In my own career my research was into numerical simulations/ experiments of convection. Could have possibly got a research assistant position at Queen Mary College extending Phd research into three dimensional more realistic simulations. In the end got a research assistant position at Swansea University with similar numerical work. If stayed in research could very likely got another few Research Assistant positions, there are not many people around with patience to painstakingly fix software issues, but could never see this leading to a permanent lectureship position, let alone a professorship. So took a software engineering position and immediately doubled salary.

  3. Paint the Sky with Stars Says:

    The thing is, they also get lots of spoils from being part of large collaborations such as plenty of papers, citations, conferences and letter writers. It’s a double-edged sword. What do they want? To be the stars in a collaboration that is made of hundreds of people? If you want to be independent and write sole-author papers, you have to be willing to risk failure. It’s not that complicated in a field like observational astronomy where one can work with archival data and many observatories are open to proposals from anyone. The truth is, the jerks in the positions of power are there because there are plenty of people who just want a stable job and are willing to remain under their shadow. If you have your own light you need to leave and find your own path.

Leave a comment