Archive for AGP

Good Morning Swindon

Posted in Biographical, Science Politics with tags , , on August 28, 2013 by telescoper

So here I am again, in the picturesque town of Swindon (Wilts) for the three-day festival of fun and frivolity that is the Astronomy Grants Panel. I probably won’t get much time to blog, so I thought I’d post a photograph of the idyllic view from my hotel window, in case any of you think I’m here enjoying myself…

 

Urgent Announcement from the AGP

Posted in Science Politics with tags , , , on December 1, 2012 by telescoper

As the festive season approaches, the UK government has decided  to make immediate changes to the  procedures to be followed for the allocation and distribution of yuletide gifts. In previous years, such awards have been made  directly by the agency involved, e.g. proposals within the STFC  remit have been directly Sent To Father Christmas, often in hand-written format. However, to cut costs improve the quality of service, it has been decided to extend the operations of the Shared Services Centre to cover such applications, which will henceforth be administered by a Shared Santa Claus (SSC), after being uploaded to the JES system (in Word 95 format only). They will then be sent to relevant experts for peer review, i.e. the Advent Gift Panel (AGP).

In preparing submissions, Applicants should note the following  important revisions to AGP guidelines.

Proposals must include:

  1. The aims and scope of the presents requested and any interrelation between them, where appropriate.
  2. The areas in which the Applicants have a proven track-record in the general area of not being naughty, including (where appropriate) highlights of particularly good behaviour within the last three years.
  3. The support  already provided to the Applicants with particular emphasis on recent investments that are relevant to the gifts requested.
  4. How the Applicants will be advanced as a result of the proposed present.
  5. How the  requested present  fits within the international context, i.e. is it of comparable quality to the best gifts available overseas?
  6. The likely impact of the present (e.g. when thrown around the living room).
  7. How you expect the present to evolve over the next three years, e.g. is it likely to break or need repair?
  8. The level of resources needed to supply the present.
  9. How the gift will contribute to the UK economy over the next thirty years.

The following supplementary rules also apply:

  1. Consumables will be allocated using a formula based on the number of FTE awarded, to include (per FTE): one Bernard Matthews Turkey Twizzler, three sprouts, 2 potatoes (including one roast if the case justifies such extravagance), and one small carrot/parsnip. Gravy is expected to be provided from local resources.
  2. Christmas puddings and/or mince pies are covered by a different  programme (overseen by the Hefty Pudding Committee, HPC)  and will require a separate application; a Cheese Board may also be convened if there is sufficient demand.
  3. Requests for crackers are welcomed, as long as the proposal is not entirely crackers.
  4. Travel expenses will be limited to the cost of one sleigh ride (weather permitting).
  5. Batteries will not be included.
  6. Under no circumstances will funding be allocated for the purchase of paperweights.
  7. Each proposal  must be accompanied by a Knowledge Exchange case, explaining the impact of the proposal outside the STFC remit.
  8. Each proposal must be accompanied by an Outreach case outlining any public activities,  such as carol singing.

The deadline for applications is Friday 14th December 2012. In line with normal shambolically inefficient SSC practice, awards are expected to be made sometime in April (2014).

I hope this clarifies the situation.

Astronomy Grant History (via The e-Astronomer)

Posted in Finance, Science Politics with tags , , , on February 4, 2011 by telescoper

Interesting view of astronomy grant funding versus time from AGP Chair Andy Lawrence.

Before commenting, I’m first going to calculate the Fourier Transform of Andy’s graph and analyse it in reciprocal space.

Astronomy Grant History Time for me to break a rule. As many of you will know, I am currently chairperson of STFC’s Astronomy Grants Panel. I have steered clear of discussing AGP business on this blog, for obvious reasons. However, the current round is now complete, so I can relax that rule somewhat. I wrote a chairman’s report which went out yesterday on the astrocommunity email list. Paul Crowther has put it on his website, so you can read it if you haven’t already. T … Read More

via The e-Astronomer


Share/Bookmark

Another Day, Another Panel..

Posted in Science Politics with tags , , , on April 13, 2010 by telescoper

I’m completely knackered, and my dinner’s warming up, so I’ll keep this relatively brief…

I got up at 5am this morning to take the train  to London  in order to attend the first meeting of the STFC Astronomy Grants Panel (AGP) for this year. The deadline passed in early April, and the applications have now all been received by Swindon Office so now the AGP has to swing into action, like a well-oiled machine, to rank the applications and make recommendations as to which ones should receive funding.

This meeting was chaired by the new Astronomy Grants Supremo,  the e-astronomer (although on STFC business he uses his pseudonym, Andy Lawrence). The real hard work comes in a succession of meetings later in the year, but this one was basically in order for us newbies to learn the ropes and to get a bit of background before we get going. Actually, I’ve been on such panels before – I chaired the Astronomy Theory Panel a few years ago, before moving to Cardiff – but it’s all changed quite a lot and I’m actually glad  I had the chance to learn about the new procedures. It was nice to see the other people involved too, some of whom I didn’t know before and some of whom I’ve known for years (often from other panels). When you get older as an academic, life turns into a Succession of  Panels. Sigh. I wonder if there are Panels in the Afterlife?

The backdrop to this round was provided by the deep cuts in Astronomy research that emerged from last year’s STFC  Prioritisation Exercise. We heard a summary of the Financial Position that was shocking in its magnitude as well as depressing in its likely long-term effects. In 2008, STFC funded “new” 92 postdoctoral research positions across the UK making the total number of astronomy PDRAs at that time about 295 (a PDRA usually lasts three years). In 2009 the number of new positions dropped to 69, and projections suggest a  number of about 60 this year. This will put the number of astronomy PDRAs at about 180, just short of a 40% cut with respect to the 2008 number. Moreover, last year saw a significant reduction in the number of rolling grants by about a third, although many of these carried on at a reduced level as standard (3-year) grants. Projections suggest that current funding levels will see 70% of the UK’s rolling grants unrolled in this way; this figure is higher than for this round because of  short-term injection of cash from RCUK – the famous £14 Million – that ameliorated the cuts this year and the fact that this year’s grant funding had slightly more money in it than other years of the three-year cycle for historical reasons. A full report of last year’s grants round should be available on the STFC website soon.

UPDATE: It is there now.

Of course it remains to be seen what happens in practice, and how this compares with projections of this sort. I won’t be able to say much on this blog about the process from now on – for reasons of confidentiality – but I can assure everyone reading this that everyone on the AGP wants to fund excellent science and will do everything they can to make the system work in a way that achieves this in the fairest possible manner. It’s inevitable, though, that in these tough times some excellent research will not be supported. That’s the thing that makes these Panels so stressful.

Anyway, apart from my growing apprehension of the scale of the task in front of us, the trip to London was otherwise pleasant. A lovely train journey in the sunshine through the beautiful spring greenery of Wales and England was very relaxing, and I even got tomorrow’s lecture written on the way. The meeting took place in a cramped and stuffy room at the Royal Institute of British Architects, a building of such poor design that you might think RIBA would disown it. Come to think of it, no. It probably won an award. Crap buildings so often do.

Oh, and the caterers forgot to supply our lunch on time too. Eventually we got a few measly sandwiches at about 2pm. Not impressive. Still, the main meetings will all be in Swindon. What a delight.

The way home wasn’t such fun. One of the engines of the train conked out shortly after leaving Paddington so we couldn’t go at proper speed and I got back to Cardiff 20 minutes late. It was still sunny, though, and I’d just put some lovely new music on my iPod so I wasn’t too bothered.

Now my dinner’s ready. And this has been 700 words. That’s not particularly brief, even by my standards…