Following on from the fogeydom displayed in my previous post, I wonder how many of my readers ever use bookmarks? I do. In fact, I have a collection that goes back at least 20 years (part of which is shown above).
(I don’t remember how I got the Harry Potter one, as I haven’t read any of those books…)
I can’t believe that some people still haven’t updated to Windows 11. I’m already on Windows 95!
(I bought that laptop about 30 years ago, and it still works!)
I’m a bit late getting around to posting today as I’ve been busy all day sending off for documents and filling in forms connected with my forthcoming sabbatical. My relocation is a little more complicated than I initially thought as although Ireland is in the European Union, it is not in the Schengen area, so a visit for longer than 90 days requires a bit of paperwork. In fact I am applying for what is called a “non-lucrative residence permit”. It seems to be strange to be applying for non-lucrative status, as that’s what I seem to have had all my life, but there you go.
Anyway, as part of the bureaucratic process I have to acquire a Police Certificate, a document that states that I have no criminal record over the last five years. To get this in Ireland one has to visit a Garda station. There is one in Maynooth, but unfortunately there is rarely anyone staffing it, so I decided to go instead to Leixlip, where the station is open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. It’s also just a short bus trip from Maynooth.
So this morning I downloaded the requisite form from the Garda website, collected the documents listed there, and off I went to Leixlip. I had to wait a little bit of time because there were a couple of people needing things. One was inquiring about a court summons for something he claimed he had paid already but didn’t have a receipt. Eventually he left, though he wasn’t happy about having to attend court. The next chap just had to sign some sort of register. He might have been on probation or had to check in with the Gardaí to fulfil some other conditions.
I always feel a bit sorry for people working at the front desk in a place like a Garda station. They must often be confronted by people who are not having a very good day, and probably have to deal with a bit of aggravation from time to time.
Then it was my turn. The officer at the desk was very friendly but when I explained what I needed he produced a form that stated I needed additional documents not listed on the website, including a copy of my birth certificate, a document explaining what I needed the certificate for, and a stamped addressed envelope to receive the certificate. I was a bit annoyed, but had no alternative but to go back to Maynooth and collect the missing papers. Bureaucracy is bureaucracy and there’s no point letting it get to you.
After returning in due course with the gaps in my documents filled, I found the waiting area at Garda station empty and I was able to hand over my documents which I was assured were now sufficient. I just have to wait a bit to get the certificate in the post.
On the bus home after the second trip to Leixlip it struck me that today was the first time I’ve been in a Garda station, and the second time…
Now that’s out of the way, it’s wine o’clock and the bank holiday weekend beckons.
Today has been a rather eventful day.
This morning at around 7.50am, the power went off in my house in Maynooth. I looked at the ESB network site and it informed me that a large area was affected, extending as far as Celbridge. I could hear burglar alarms ringing all around the estate, evidently triggered by the interruption to the mains supply. I am aware
I had actually just got out of bed when the failure happened but, there being no electricity to make breakfast nor to have a shower, the ESB indicating that it would take until 9am to fix the “outage”, and being unable to function without at least one coffee, I took the obvious course of action and went back to bed. In fact the power came on well before 9am so I had my breakfast and shower, then went around resetting the clocks on various bits of equipment.
It was only when I looked at the burglar alarm that I realized that the power cut had fried its circuits and I could not reset it. I therefore had to search around the internet for someone to come and fix it.
While I was looking on the internet for a company that would deal with the alarm system I have, I checked my work email and discovered that a the new TSI building had no power at around 9.30am. Whether that was connected with the larger problem I don’t know for sure, but it took longer to fix. I don’t know whether any other buildings on campus were affected either. I only received notification that power had been restored just after 11am.
Unfortunately there were a large number of repeat examinations due to take place in the building at 9.30, none of which could go ahead; those papers are now deferred until 10th August. None of the repeat examinations to be taken by students in the Department of Theoretical Physics were scheduled in that slot, so our students were unaffected, but over 300 other students in other Departments were inconvenienced.
P.S. my domestic burglar alarm is now fixed and functioning properly, in case you had any ideas…
A few weeks ago I mentioned on this blog the appalling decision by the President to scrap elections to the Governing Authority of the University in favour of having representatives chosen only by The Management. This contempt for democratic processes is just one example of the increasingly authoritarian administration of the University. Can anyone justify the complete disenfranchisement of the staff of the University from the governance of the University? Or that an executive body should itself select the board to which it is supposed to be accountable?
Within the last week, an article appeared in the Independent that contained the following:
A university spokeswoman said the governing authority “is reflecting on the recent feedback from some staff about the process for establishing a new governing authority”. The new governing body was to be put in place later this year. “The governing authority is scheduled to meet on August 22 to consider the most appropriate way forward on this issue,” she added.
Independent, Sunday 30th July.
Note the use of an “anonymous spokeswoman”. I have no idea who this person is, nor who gives her authority to speak on behalf of the governing authority. This state of affairs is symptomatic of the complete detachment of The Management from the rest of us at the University. The story suggests that the University is going to consider different options for appointments to the new Governing Authority. Perhaps it should have considered a bit more before trying to ram through a massively unpopular process that has brought the management into such disrepute that its poor governance is now appearing regularly in the news media?
Anyway, in my opinion the only sensible approach is to restore elections to the Governing Authority. I’m not the only one to think this. In fact there is a petition raised by the Union IFUT:
We call on Maynooth University to reverse their decision to instigate selection and to restore the democratic election process for all five staff representatives on the Governing Authority.
It goes on to say
The decision by MU’s Governing Authority and senior management to replace democratic elections with a selection process, whereby they assume, with the assistance of a private recruitment firm, the responsibility of handpicking staff representatives, is an attack on basic principles of democracy and good governance.
I agree with this wholeheartedly, and have signed the petition. I encourage you to do likewise. You can sign it here. And please spread the news of the petition as widely as you can. This is a battle we can’t afford to lose, as experience suggests it is the thin end of a very sinister wedge.
I’ll just add a more general point. If The Management thinks that the deliberate alienation of its staff is a recipe for a successful high education institution then it has another think coming. Perhaps it should consider working with its academics rather than against them?
I asked an AI text generator to write a University strategic plan using language inspired by revolutionary Marxist ideology.
–0–
Title: A Revolutionary Blueprint for the Liberation of Academia
Introduction:
In a world plagued by capitalist exploitation and class struggle, our University stands as a potential beacon of hope, empowering the masses through education and disseminating revolutionary knowledge. This strategic plan aims to dismantle oppressive structures, challenge the prevailing bourgeois ideology, and create a training ground for future Marxist revolutionaries.
1. Mission Statement:
Our mission is to cultivate a class-conscious academic community that aims to dismantle the prevailing capitalist neoliberal order, liberate the proletariat, and build a socialist society based on equality, justice, and collective ownership of the means of production.
2. Curriculum Reform:
a) The fundamental aim of our curriculum will be to decolonize knowledge, expose the hidden power dynamics embedded within it, and weave an emancipatory narrative from a Marxist perspective.
b) Introduce mandatory courses on critical theory, historical materialism, and class struggle that challenge dominant paradigms.
c) Ensure that the curriculum reflects the experiences and ideas of historically marginalized groups, giving voice to their struggles and promoting solidarity among all oppressed peoples.
3. Faculty and Staff:
a) Establish strict selection criteria to ensure that faculty and staff align with our revolutionary vision and principles, actively engage in anti-capitalist research and activism, and prioritize pedagogical engagement.
b) Encourage the formation of faculty and staff unions to safeguard against exploitation, regularly review salaries to ensure equitable compensation, and provide opportunities for professional development.
c) Encourage the recruitment of scholars from historically oppressed communities, diversifying perspectives and challenging dominant knowledge production.
4. Campus Community:
a) Create safe spaces for open discussions and political organizing, fostering an environment that encourages class-consciousness, solidarity, and resistance.
b) Establish student support systems that address financial burdens, mental health struggles, and any form of discrimination or oppression.
c) Promote democratic decision-making processes in all aspects of university governance, where students, faculty, and staff have equal voices in shaping the university’s direction.
5. Research and Activism:
a) Encourage and support research that critically examines capitalist exploitation, exposes the contradictions of the system, and offers alternatives for a just socialist society.
b) Forge alliances and partnerships with grassroots organizations, labour movements, and other revolutionary groups to nurture a culture of activism and revolutionary praxis.
c) Prioritize research that positively impacts working-class communities, seeking solutions to their pressing problems and involving them in the research process.
6. Community Engagement:
a) Forge strong ties with working-class communities, initiating outreach programs that offer educational resources and promote social mobility.
b) Establish partnerships with trade unions and labor organizations to provide students with opportunities for practical learning and connection to real-world struggles.
c) Collaborate with progressive organizations to advocate for policy changes that address socio-economic inequalities and pave the way for a socialist transformation.
Conclusion:
This strategic plan strives to create an academically rigorous, politically conscious, and inclusive environment that nurtures critical thinking, challenges capitalist hegemony, and empowers students, faculty, and staff towards the emancipation of the working class. By implementing these measures, our University will become a bulwark of Marxist education, fostering the next generation of revolutionaries who will shape a society based on justice, equality, and liberation.
Here is a concise description of the effect on the morale of academic staff at Maynooth University of the current strategy of expanding the number of senior administrators at Maynooth University at the expense of resources for teaching and research.
It’s August already, which means it is time once again for the repeat examination period to begin. Maynooth University has produced this nice good luck message for those resitting so I’ll pass it on here:
I was a bit surprised when I first arrived here that the August repeat examinations are called the Autumn Repeats. After all, they start on 1st August which is generally regarded as summer rather than Autumn. The term is, I think, a relic of the old Celtic calendar in which the start of Autumn coincides with the start of harvesting, the old festival of Lúnasa being when people celebrated the Celtic deity Lugh, who would bring a good harvest or who, if not satisfied, could bring his wrath in storms that would mess everything up. Lúnasa is the name for August in modern Irish; Lá Lúnasa is 1st August, a cross-quarter day lying (approximately) half-way between the summer solstice and the autumnal equinox. The festival is marked in the modern calendar by a Bank Holiday on the first Monday in August (Lá Saoire i mí Lúnasa) which is next Monday (7th August), so I have a long weekend to look forward to!
Anyway, the repeat examinations start today and go on for ten days or so, except there are none on the Bank Holiday when the University is closed. As it happens, my first paper is on Saturday, so I won’t be able to collect any scripts until Tuesday 8th, on which day I have two further examinations, so I’ll have three different sets to deal with.
Every year at this time I mention the difference between the system of repeats in Maynooth compared to other institutions with which I am familiar, especially in the UK. Students generally take resits when, because they have failed one or more examinations the previous May, they have not accumulated sufficient credits to proceed to the next year of their course. Passing the resit allows them to retrieve lost credit, but their mark is generally capped at a bare pass (usually 40%). That means the student gets the credit they need for their degree but their average (which determines whether they get 1st, 2nd or 3rd class Honours) is affected. This is the case unless a student has extenuating circumstances affecting the earlier examination, such as bad health or family emergency, in which case they take the resit as a `sit’, i.e. for the first time with an uncapped mark.
Here in Maynooth, however, the mark obtained in a repeat examination is usually not capped. Indeed, some students – though not many – elect to take the repeat examination even if they passed earlier in the summer, in order to increase their average mark.
Some people don’t like the idea of uncapped repeats because they feel that it would lead to many students playing games, i.e. deliberately not taking exams in May with the intention of spreading some of their examination load into August. There’s not much sign of students actually doing that here, to be honest, for the reason that the results from the repeat examination period are not confirmed until early September so that students that deploy this strategy do not know whether they are going to be able to start their course until just a couple of weeks before term. That could cause lots of problems securing accommodation, etc, so it doesn’t seem to me to be a good ploy.
I’d welcome comments for or against whether resits/repeats should be capped/uncapped and on what practice is adopted in your institution.
Following on from yesterday’s post about the “first light” images from the European Space Agency’s Euclid mission, here is a little video highlighting the brilliant work done by the instrument teams over the last month .
P.S. You can find some Irish press coverage of the first light images here.
As I promised a couple of days ago, the “first light” images from the European Space Agency’s Euclid mission have now been released. You can find all the details here, but a summary is that these are “engineering” images, rather than part of the full survey to be undertaken by Euclid, and the commissioning of the instruments is not quite finished, but the telescope is now in focus and both instruments (the visual instrument, VIS, and the Near-Infrared Spectrometer & Photometer, NISP) are working well enough to show some preliminary results.
Anyway, here are the pictures released today, first from VIS:
The next one is from NISP:
This final one, also from NISP, shows it working in grism mode, which allows the light from sources to be dispersed into a spectrum, enabling us to get much more information about the sources galaxies than a straightforward image would. The resulting images look a bit strange to the untrained eye – as the light from a point is spread out into a streak – but the result is wonderfully rich in information:
For more information – and some higher-resolution images – see the official Euclid press release here.
For myself, I’d just say these images are absolutely amazing given that they were taken during the commissioning phase and the instruments aren’t fully tweaked yet. Over the next few weeks, there will be a performance verification phase which will tell us how good Euclid will be at meeting its science goals. But so far it’s all looking very good indeed. I’ve only ever seen simulations of what would come out and it’s very exciting to see what the real thing looks like!
Hats off to the brilliant instrumentation experts who not only designed and built the kit but who have been working so hard on the commissioning. They’ve done so much in the month that has passed since the launch!
P.S. You can find here a nice explainer of some of the instrumental artefacts you might have spotted in the images above.
In the Dark 