In the Dark

https://doi.org/10.33232/001c.146158

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "The DECADE cosmic shear project I: A new weak lensing shape catalog of 107 million galaxies" by Dhayaa Anbajagane (University of Chicago, USA) et al. (54 authors)

October 22, 2025, 12:42 pm 2 boosts 0 favorites

Open Journal of Astrophysics

https://doi.org/10.33232/001c.146159

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "The DECADE cosmic shear project II: photometric redshift calibration of the source galaxy sample" by Dhayaa Anbajagane (University of Chicago, USA) et al. (53 authors)

October 22, 2025, 1:07 pm 2 boosts 0 favorites

Open Journal of Astrophysics

https://doi.org/10.33232/001c.146160

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "The DECADE cosmic shear project III: validation of analysis pipeline using spatially inhomogeneous data" by Dhayaa Anbajagane (University of Chicago, USA) et al. (53 authors)

October 22, 2025, 1:57 pm 1 boosts 0 favorites

Open Journal of Astrophysics

https://doi.org/10.33232/001c.146161

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "The DECADE cosmic shear project IV: cosmological constraints from 107 million galaxies across 5,400 deg^2 of the sky" by Dhayaa Anbajagane (University of Chicago, USA) et al. (75 authors)

October 22, 2025, 2:47 pm 1 boosts 0 favorites

The fifth and final paper for this week is “Clustering of DESI galaxies split by thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect” by Michael Rashkovetskyi of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, or CfA for short, and 48 others. This one was published on Wednesday 23rd October in the folder Cosmology and NonGalactic Astrophysics. This paper explores how the clustering properties of galaxies mapped by the Dark energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) relate to the local thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich emission mapped by the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT). The overlay is here:

The officially accepted version can be found on arXiv here, and the fediverse announcement is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

https://doi.org/10.33232/001c.146033

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Clustering of DESI galaxies split by thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect" by Michael Rashkovetskyi (Cfa Harvard-Smithsonian, USA) et al. (49 authors)

October 23, 2025, 8:28 am 1 boosts 0 favorites

That concludes the papers for this week. With one week to go and our total at 396, I still think we might reach the 400 total by the end of October.

Weekly Update from the Open Journal of Astrophysics: 05/07/2025

Posted in OJAp Papers, Open Access, The Universe and Stuff with tags 2504.16161v2, arXiv:2409.05140v3, arXiv:2506.23331v1, Astrophysics of Galaxies, binary stars, binary supernovae, DESI, Diamond Open Access, Diamond Open Access Publishing, Earth and Planetary Astrophysics, Galactic dust, Newtonian Mechanics, Open Access, reddening, Self-gravitating Systems, Solar and Stellar Astrophysics, supernovae, The Open Journal of Astrophysics on July 5, 2025 by telescoper

It’s Saturday so, once again, it’s time for the weekly update of papers published at the Open Journal of Astrophysics. Since the last update we have published three new papers, which brings the number in Volume 8 (2025) up to 85, and the total so far published by OJAp up to 320.

The three papers published this week, with their overlays, are as follows. You can click on the images of the overlays to make them larger should you wish to do so.

The first paper to report is “Stellar reddening map from DESI imaging and spectroscopy” by Rongpu Zhou (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA) and an international case of 56 others too numerous to mention individually. This paper was published on 1st July 2025 in the folder marked Astrophysics of Galaxies. It describes maps of stellar reddening by Galactic dust inferred from observations obtained using the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, and a comparison with previous such maps. The overlay is here:

You can find the final, accepted, version on arXiv here.

Next one up is “On inertial forces (indirect terms) in problems with a central body” by Aurélien Crida (Université Côte d’Azur, France) and 17 others – again too numerous to be listed individually – based in France, Italy, Germany, Mexico and the USA. This paper discusses the indirect terms that arise the Newtonian dynamics of multi-body systems dominated by a central massive body, upon which other bodies exert a gravitational pull, when the massive body is treated as the origin of the coordinate system. This one, also published on July 1st 2025, is in the folder marked Earth and Planetary Astrophysics.

The overlay is here:

You can find the officially accepted version on arXiv here.

The last paper of this batch is “Stellar ejection velocities from the binary supernova scenario: A comparison across population synthesis codes” by Tom Wagg (U. Washington, USA), David D. Hendriks (U. Surrey, UK), Mathieu Renzo (U. Arizona, USA) and Katelyn Breivik (Carnegie Mellon U., USA). It was published on July 2nd 2025 in the folder Solar and Stellar Astrophysics and it presents comparison of the ejection velocities of stars ejected from binary systems by supernova explosions predicted in three different population synthesis codes.

The overlay is here:

You can read the final accepted version on arXiv here.

That’s all the papers for this week. I’ll post another update next weekend.

Weekly Update at the Open Journal of Astrophysics – 08/03/2025

Posted in OJAp Papers, Open Access, The Universe and Stuff with tags 3x2pt analysis, Active galactic nuclei, arXiv:2411.13625v2, arXiv:2412.12548v2, arXiv:2412.17714v2, arXiv:2501.04549v2, Bayesian Inference, Cosmology, Cosmology and NonGalactic Astrophysics, DESI, Diamond Open Access, Diamond Open Access Publishing, entropy, Gamma Ray Bursts, High-Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Information Theory, numerical simulations, planetary nebulae, Solar and Stellar Astrophysics, Statistical Mechanics, Weak Lensing on March 8, 2025 by telescoper

Time for the weekly Saturday morning update of papers published at the Open Journal of Astrophysics. Since the last update we have published four new papers, which brings the number in Volume 8 (2025) up to 25 and the total so far published by OJAp up to 260.

In chronological order of publication, the four papers published this week, with their overlays, are as follows. You can click on the images of the overlays to make them larger should you wish to do so.

The first paper to report is “Partition function approach to non-Gaussian likelihoods: information theory and state variables for Bayesian inference” by Rebecca Maria Kuntz, Heinrich von Campe, Tobias Röspel, Maximilian Philipp Herzog, and Björn Malte Schäfer, all from the University of Heidelberg (Germany). It was published on Wednesday March 5th 2025 in the folder Cosmology and NonGalactic Astrophysics and it discusses the relationship between information theory and thermodynamics with applications to Bayesian inference in the context of cosmological data sets.

You can read the officially accepted version of this paper on arXiv here.

The second paper of the week is “The Cosmological Population of Gamma-Ray Bursts from the Disks of Active Galactic Nuclei” by Hoyoung D. Kang & Rosalba Perna (Stony Brook), Davide Lazzati (Oregon State), and Yi-Han Wang (U. Nevada), all based in the USA. It was published on Thursday 6th March 2025 in the folder High-Energy Astrophysical Phenomena. The authors use models for GRB electromagnetic emission to simulate the cosmological occurrence and observational detectability of both long and short GRBs within AGN disks

You can find the officially accepted version of this paper on arXiv here.

The next two papers were published on Friday 7th March 2025.

“The distribution of misalignment angles in multipolar planetary nebulae” by Ido Avitan and Noam Soker (Technion, Haifa, Israel) analyzes the statistics of measured misalignment angles in multipolar planetary nebulae implies a random three-dimensional angle distribution limited to <60 degrees. It is in the folder Solar and Stellar Astrophysics.

Here is the overlay:

The official published version can be found on the arXiv here.

The last paper to report this week is “The DESI-Lensing Mock Challenge: large-scale cosmological analysis of 3×2-pt statistics” by Chris Blake (Swinburne, Australia) and 43 others; this is a large international collaboration and I apologize for not being able to list all the authors here!

This one is in the folder marked Cosmology and NonGalactic Astrophysics; it presents an end-to-end simulation study designed to test the analysis pipeline for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Year 1 galaxy redshift dataset combined with weak gravitational lensing from other surveys.

The overlay is here:

You can find the “final” version on arXiv here.

That’s all for this week. It’s good to see such an interesting variety of topics. I’ll do another update next Saturday

Cosmology Talks: Recent DESI Power Spectrum Results

Posted in The Universe and Stuff with tags Cosmology, Cosmology Talks, Dark Energy, Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, DESI, Physics on December 12, 2024 by telescoper

Some weeks ago I posted an item about recent results that have emerged from the DESI (Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument) Collaboration. I have been a bit busy since then but I just saw that there is one of those Cosmology Talks about these results which I thought I would pass on. The contributors are Arnaud de Mattia, Hector Gil-Marín and Pauline Zarrouk and they are talking about the analsysis they have done using the “full shape” of the galaxy power spectrum. It’s quite a long video, but very illuminating.

New Results from DESI

Posted in Barcelona, The Universe and Stuff with tags astronomy, Cosmology, Dark Energy, Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, dark matter, DESI, ICCUB, Physics on November 20, 2024 by telescoper

The Mayall Telescope at Kitt Peak, in which DESI is housed. This PR image was taken during a meteor shower, which is not ideal observing conditions. Picture Credit: KPNO/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/R. Sparks

I’ve just got time between meetings to mention that a clutch of brand new papers has emerged from the DESI (Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument) Collaboration. There is a press release discussing the results from the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory here and one from the ICCUB in Barcelona here; several members of the group I visited there during sabbatical are working on DESI. Congratulations to them.

I haven’t had time to read them yet, but a quick skim suggests that the results are consistent with the standard cosmological model.

The latest batch contains three Key Publications:

DESI Collaboration et al., DESI 2024 II: Sample Definitions, Characteristics, and Two-point Clustering Statistics
DESI Collaboration et al., DESI 2024 V: Full-Shape Galaxy Clustering from Galaxies and Quasars
DESI Collaboration et al., DESI 2024 VII: Cosmological Constraints from the Full-Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements

together with the companion supporting papers:

Ishak et al. (2024), Modified Gravity Constraints from the Full Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements from DESI 2024
Rosado-Marín et al. (2024), Mitigating Imaging Systematics for DESI 2024 Emission Line Galaxies and Beyond
Bianchi et al. (2024), Characterization of DESI fiber assignment incompleteness effect on 2-point clustering and mitigation methods for Y1 analysis
Forero-Sánchez et al. (2024), Analytical and EZmock covariance validation for the DESI 2024 results
Findlay et al. (2024), Exploring HOD-dependent systematics for the DESI 2024 Full-Shape galaxy clustering analysis

The links lead to the arXiv version of these papers. These articles can also be found, along with previously released publications by the DESI Collaboration, here.

Anyone who has read the latest papers is welcome to comment through the box below!

3 Comments »

Evolving Dark Energy or Supernovae Systematics?

Posted in The Universe and Stuff with tags Cosmology, Dark Energy, Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, Dark Energy Survey, DES, DESI, evolving dark energy, Pantheon on August 15, 2024 by telescoper

A few months ago I posted an item about the release new results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI). That was then followed by a presentation explaining the details which you can find here to find out more about the techniques involved. At the time the new DESI results garnered a lot of media attention much of it about claims that the measurements provided evidence for “New Physics”, such as evolving dark energy. Note that the DESI results themselves did not imply this. Only when combined with supernova measurements did this suggestion arise.

Now there’s a new preprint out by George Efstathiou of Cambridge. The abstract is here:

Recent results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) collaboration have been interpreted as evidence for evolving dark energy. However, this interpretation is strongly dependent on which Type Ia supernova (SN) sample is combined with DESI measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) and observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation. The strength of the evidence for evolving dark energy ranges from ~3.9 sigma for the Dark Energy 5 year (DES5Y) SN sample to ~ 2.5 sigma for the Pantheon+ sample. Here I compare SN common to both the DES5Y and Pantheon+ compilations finding evidence for an offset of ~0.04 mag. between low and high redshifts. Correcting for this offset brings the DES5Y sample into very good agreement with the Planck LCDM cosmology. Given that most of the parameter range favoured by the uncorrected DES5Y sample is discrepant with many other cosmological datasets, I conclude that the evidence for evolving dark energy is most likely a result of systematics in the DES5Y sample.

Here are a couple of figures from the paper illustrating the difference in parameter constraints using the uncorrected (left) and corrected (right) Dark Energy (Survey) 5 year Supernova sample.

The y-axis shows a parameter w_a, which is zero in the standard model with non-evolving dark energy; the non-zero value implied by the left hand panel using the uncorrected data.

Just as with the Hubble Tension I blogged about yesterday, the evidence for a fundamental revision of our standard model may be nothing of the sort but some kind of systematic error. I think we can expect a response from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) team. Grab your popcorn.

Presentation of the BAO DESI results at ICCUB Uni Barcelona – by Licia Verde & Héctor Gil Marin

Posted in The Universe and Stuff with tags Barcelona, baryon acoustic oscillations, Cosmology, Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, DESI on April 8, 2024 by telescoper

Last week, when I wrote about the new results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) I mentioned that there would be a seminar here at ICCUB about that very topic. Well, the seminar, by Licia Verde & Héctor Gil Marin, was recorded and here it is:

Cosmology Talks: Cosmological Constraints from BAO

Posted in The Universe and Stuff, YouTube with tags astronomy, Cosmology, Cosmology Talks, Dark Energy, Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, DESI, Physics, Science, Shaun Hotchkiss, Universe on April 5, 2024 by telescoper

Here’s another video in the Cosmology Talks series curated by Shaun Hotchkiss. This one very timely after yesterday’s announcement. Here is the description on the YouTube page:

The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) has produced cosmological constraints! And it is living up to its name. Two researchers from DESI, Seshadri Nadathur and Andreu Font-Ribera, tell us about DESI’s measurements of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) released today. These results use one full year of DESI data and are the first cosmological constraints from the telescope that have been released. Mostly, it is what you might expect: tighter constraints. However, in the realm of the equation of state of dark energy, they find, even with BAO alone, that there is a hint of evidence for evolving dark energy. When they combine their data with CMB and Supernovae, who both also find small hints of evolving dark energy on their own, the evidence for dark energy not being a cosmological constant jumps as high as 3.9σ with one combination of the datasets. It seems there still is “concordance cosmology”, it’s just not ΛCDM for these datasets. The fact that all three probes are tentatively favouring this is intriguing, as it makes it unlikely to be due to systematic errors in one measurement pipeline.

My own take is that the results are very interesting but I think we need to know a lot more about possible systematics before jumping to conclusions about time-varying dark energy. Am I getting conservative in my old age? These results from DESI do of course further underline the motivation for Euclid (another Stage IV survey), which may have an even better capability to identify departures from the standard model.

P.S. Here’s a nice graphic showing the cosmic web showing revealed by the DESI survey:

2 Comments »

DESI Year 1 Results: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

Posted in Barcelona, Euclid, The Universe and Stuff with tags baryon acoustic oscillations, Cosmology, Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, DESI, Hubble Tension on April 4, 2024 by telescoper

There has been a lot of excitement around the ICCUB today – the press have been here and everything – ahead of the release of the Year 1 results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI). The press release from the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory in California can be found here.

The papers were just released at 5pm CEST and can be found here. The key results pertain to Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAOs) which can be used to track the expansion rate and geometry of the Universe. This is one of the techniques that will be used by Euclid.

There’s a lot of technical information to go through and I have to leave fairly soon. Fortunately we have seminar tomorrow that will explain everything at a level I can understand:

I will update this post with a bit more after the talk, but for the time being I direct you to the high-level cosmological implications are discussed in this paper (which is Paper VI from DESI).

If your main interest is in the Hubble Tension then I direct you to this Figure:

Depending on the other data sets included, the value obtained is around 68.5 ± 0.7 in the usual units, closer to the (lower) Planck CMB value than the (higher) Supernovae values but not exactly in agreement; the error bars are quite small too.

You might want to read my thoughts about distances estimated from angular diameters compared with distances measured using luminosity distances here.

If you’re wondering whether there is any evidence for departures from the standard cosmology, another pertinent comment is:

In summary, DESI data, both alone and in combination with other cosmological probes, do not show any evidence for a constant equation of state parameter different from −1 when a flat wCDM model is assumed.
DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

More complicated models of time-varying dark energy might work, but there’s no strong evidence from the current data.

That’s all from me for now, but feel free to comment through the box below with any hot takes!

UPDATE: As expected there has been quite a lot of press coverage about this – see the examples below – mostly concentrating on the alleged evidence for “new physics”. Personally I think the old physics is fine!

Cosmology Talks: DESI detects BAOs!

Posted in The Universe and Stuff with tags arXiv:2304.08427, BAO, baryon acoustic oscillations, Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, DESI on May 15, 2023 by telescoper

It’s been too long since I last posted one of the cosmology talks curated on YouTube by Sean Hotchkiss so I will endeavour to put that right by posting one today.

In this video, Jeongin Moon, David Valcin and Christoph Saulder talk about the first cosmologically relevant results from DESI (the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument), including the first detection of the BAOs (Baryon Acoustic Oscillations) therefrom. It’s pretty impressive for a first detection with only two months worth of data, so the final result with the full data set should be spectacular!

You can of course read the paper related to these results (by Moon et al.) on the arXiv here.

Follow @telescoper