Archive for Giant Arc

Weekly Update from the Open Journal of Astrophysics – 18/10/2025

Posted in OJAp Papers, Open Access, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on October 18, 2025 by telescoper

It’s time once again for the usual Saturday update of the week’s new papers at the Open Journal of Astrophysics. Since the last update we have published four  more papers, which brings the number in Volume 8 (2025) up to 156, and the total so far published by OJAp up to 391.

I’d like to encourage people to follow our feed on the Fediverse via Mastodon (where I announce papers as they are published, including the all-important DOI) so this week I’ll include links to each announcement there.

The first paper to report is “Shot noise in clustering power spectra” by Nicolas Tessore (University College London, UK) and Alex Hall (University of Edinburgh, UK). This was published in the folder Cosmology and NonGalactic Astrophysics on Tuesday October 14th 2025. This presents a discussion of the effects of ‘shot noise’, an additive contribution due to degenerate pairs of points, in angular galaxy clustering power spectra. Here is a screen grab of the overlay:

You can find the officially accepted version of the paper here. The Mastodon announcement is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Shot noise in clustering power spectra" by Nicolas Tessore (University College London, UK) and Alex Hall (University of Edinburgh, UK)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.145919

October 14, 2025, 7:07 am 2 boosts 0 favorites

Next one up is “The Giant Arc – Filament or Figment?” by Till Sawala and Meri Teeriaho (University of Helsinki, Finland). This paper discusses the abundance of large arc-like structures formed in the standard cosmological model, with reference to the “Giant Arc” identified in MgII absorption systems. It was published on Wednesday October 15th in the folder Cosmology and NonGalactic Astrophysics. The overlay is here:

The officially accepted version of this paper can be found on the arXiv here and the Mastodon announcement is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "The Giant Arc – Filament or Figment?" by Till Sawala and Meri Teeriaho (University of Helsinki, Finland)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.145931

October 15, 2025, 6:33 am 2 boosts 3 favorites

 

The third paper this week,  published on Monday 6th October, is “Detecting wide binaries using machine learning algorithms” by Amoy Ashesh, Harsimran Kaur and Sandeep Aashish (Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, India). This was published on Friday 17th October (yesterday) in the folder Astrophysics of Galaxies. It presents a method for detecting wide binary systems in Gaia data using machine learning algorithms.

The overlay is here:

 

You can find the officially accepted version of this paper on arXiv here. The announcement on Mastodon is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Detecting wide binaries using machine learning algorithms" by Amoy Ashesh, Harsimran Kaur and Sandeep Aashish (Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, India)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.146027

October 17, 2025, 6:55 am 0 boosts 0 favorites

The last one this week is “Learned harmonic mean estimation of the Bayesian evidence with normalizing flows” by Alicja Polanska & Matthew A. Price (University College London, UK), Davide Piras (Université de Genève, CH), Alessio Spurio Mancini (Royal Holloway, London, UK) and Jason D. McEwen (University College London). This one was also published on Friday 17th October, but in the folder Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics; it presents a new method for estimating Bayesian evidence for use in model comparison, illustrated with a cosmological example.

The corresponding overlay is here:

 

You can find the officially accepted version on arXiv here. The Mastodon announcement is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Learned harmonic mean estimation of the Bayesian evidence with normalizing flows" by Alicja Polanska & Matthew A. Price (University College London, UK), Davide Piras (Université de Genève, CH), Alessio Spurio Mancini (Royal Holloway, London, UK) and Jason D. McEwen (University College London)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.146026

October 17, 2025, 7:06 am 0 boosts 0 favorites

That concludes the papers for this week. With two weeks to go I think we might reach the 400 total by the end of October.

1 Comment »

Big Things in the Universe

Posted in Bad Statistics, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , on February 7, 2025 by telescoper

About a year ago I wrote a couple of articles (here and here) in response to the discovery of a very large structure (“The Big Ring“) and claims that this structure and others – such as a Giant Arc – were inconsistent with the standard model of cosmology; the work concerned was later submitted as a preprint to arXiv. In my first post on the Big Ring I wrote

To assess the significance of the Big Ring or other structures in a proper scientific fashion, one has to calculate how probable that structure is given a model. We have a standard model that can be used for this purpose, but to simulate very structures is not straightforward because it requires a lot of computing power even to simulate just the mass distribution. In this case one also has to understand how to embed Magnesium absorption too, something which may turn out to trace the mass in a very biased way. Moreover, one has to simulate the observational selection process too, so one is doing a fair comparison between observations and predictions.

Well on today’s arXiv there is a preprint by Sawala et al. with the title aims to assess the significance of structures comparable to the Giant Arc. The title of the paper is The Emperor’s New Arc: gigaparsec patterns abound in a ΛCDM universe from which you can guess the conclusions. The abstract is

Recent discoveries of apparent large-scale features in the structure of the universe, extending over many hundreds of megaparsecs, have been claimed to contradict the large-scale isotropy and homogeneity foundational to the standard (ΛCDM) cosmological model. We explicitly test and refute this conjecture using FLAMINGO-10K, a new and very large cosmological simulation of the growth of structure in a ΛCDM context. Applying the same methods used in the observations, we show that patterns like the “Giant Arc”, supposedly in tension with the standard model, are, in fact, common and expected in a ΛCDM universe. We also show that their reported significant overdensities are an algorithmic artefact and unlikely to reflect any underlying structure.

arXiv:2502.03515

Here’s a picture of a large structure (a “Giant Arc”) taken from a gallery of such objects found in the simulations


I quote from the conclusions:

We hope that our results will dispel the misconception that no inhomogeneity can be found in the standard model Universe beyond some finite size. Instead, any given realisation of the isotropic universe comprises a time- and scale-dependent population of structures from which patterns can be identified on any scale.

I have nothing to add.

Leave a comment »