It’s been a very busy day for various reasons so I’ll just mention that this morning I published the 250th paper at the Open Journal of Astrophysics. The lucky publication to garner this distinction is “Untangling Magellanic Streams” by Dennis Zaritsky (Steward Observatory), Vedant Chandra (Harvard), Charlie Conroy (Harvard), Ana Bonaca (Carnegie Observatories), Phillip A. Cargile (Harvard), and Rohan P. Naidu (MIT), all based in the USA. Here is the overlay
This will feature in the update on Saturday along with the other papers to be published this week, of which I expect several.
I thought that this semester would have had an easier start than the last because I am teaching only one new module (and one familiar one) instead of the two new modules I had last semester. Unfortunately I wasn’t very well before the start of this one and have been struggling to recover so this term hasn’t been easy at all and I’ve had a lot to catch up. At least I’ve managed to stay on top of the lectures and lab sessions and everything so far has gone relatively smoothly. I have to admit though that only two weeks in, I already feel extremely tired. I went to bed at 9pm last night and slept straight through to my alarm at 7am. I’m getting old.
Last week we had our Examination Board meeting for Semester 1 in the Department of Physics. I also attended the Examination Board for the Department of Engineering because I was teaching an Engineering Mathematics module last semester. The students in both Departments should receive their provisional examination results this week, although there have been some gremlins in the campus systems which may lead to a delay in the marks being released.
Semester 2 is a bit more complex than Semester 1 because of a number of interruptions for holidays, etc. The first Monday of this term was actually a holiday, but I don’t actually have lectures on Mondays this term so that didn’t matter, nor will Monday 5th May which is also a holiday. I do, however, have a Particle Physics lecture on Fridays so will miss one on because of the national holiday on April 18th for Good Friday and will have to plan accordingly. The following week (Mon-Fri, starting on 21st April) is the Easter Break, and the week from 17th to 21st March is Study Week (starting with the St Patrick’s Day national holiday on Monday 17th). Although the number of teaching weeks is the same as Semester 1, they are spread out over a longer period with two gaps instead of one. One break is coming up about a month from now, and then another a month after that. This schedule is rather kind to those of us Oldies who tire easily!
Although I’ve kept up with the teaching preparation reasonably well, I have let other things slip. In particular, I have a graduate student getting ready to submit their PhD thesis ahead of an imminent deadline. I promised to read it and supply suggestions/corrections which I have yet to. That’s right at the top of my list for this week.
Talking of PhD students, my first ever official PhD student at Maynooth has already already passed his viva voce examination – about a year ago actually – but owing to bureaucratic delays he won’t graduate until this year, at a conferring ceremony in the March study week mentioned above.
The recent decision by Maynooth University to appoint a Ranking Strategy and Insights Officer in an attempt to raise the University’s position in university league tables has inspired me to create a new spinout company to provide a service for higher education institutions who want to improve their standing in rankings while avoiding the expense and complication of actually improving the institution or indeed while continuing to pursue policies that drive performance in the opposite direction.
I have decided to name my new company CLARTIVERT™ and the extensive suite of services we will provide is called the Clartiverse™.
The idea of CLARTIVERT™ is to produce, in return for a modest payment equivalent to the salary cost of a Ranking Strategy and Insights Officer, a bespoke league table that guarantees a specified position for any given institution. This can be either your own institution whose position you would like to raise or some competitor institution that you wish to lower. We then promote the league table thus constructed in the world’s media (who seem to like this sort of thing).
The idea behind this company is that the existing purveyors of rankings deliberately manufacture artificial “churn” in the league tables by changing their weighting model every year. Why not take this process to its logical conclusion? Our not-at-all dodgy software works by including so many metrics that an appropriate combination can always be chosen to propel any institution to the top (or bottom). We then produce We achieve all this by deplying a highly sophisticated branch of mathematics called Linear Algebra which we dress up in the fancy terms “Machine Learning” and “Artificial Intelligence” to impress potential buyers.
To begin we will concentrate on research assessment. This is, of course, covered by existing league tables but our approach is radically different. We will desploy a vastly expanded set of metrics, many of which are currently unused. For example, on top of the usual bibliometric indicators like citation counts and numbers of published papers, we add number of authors, number of authors whose names start with a given letter of the alphabet, letter frequencies occuring in published texts, etc. We adopt a similar approach to other indicators, such as number of academic staff, number of PhD students, number of research managers, initial letters of names of people in these different categories, distribution of salaries for each, and so on.
As well as these quantities themselves we calculate mathematical functions of them, including polynomials, exponentials, logarithms and trigonometricfunctions; sine and cosine have proved very useful in early testing. All these indicators are combined in various ways: not only added, but also subtracted, multiplied, and/or divided until a weighted combination can be found that places your institution ahead of all the others.
In future we will roll out additional elements of the Clartiverse™ to cover other aspects of higher education including not only teaching and student satisfaction but also more important things such as commercialisation and financial impropriety.
P.S. The name Clartiver is derived from the word clart and is not to be confused with that of any other companies providing similar but less impressive services.
Time for another quick update of papers published at the Open Journal of Astrophysics. Since the last update we have published two new papers, which brings the number in Volume 8 (2025) up to 14 and the total so far published by OJAp up to 249.
Here are quick descriptions of the two papers concerned; you can click on the images of the overlays to make them larger should you wish to do so.
First one up is “AI-assisted super-resolution cosmological simulations IV: An emulator for deterministic realizations” by Xiaowen Zhang & Patrick Lachance (Carnegie Mellon), Ankita Dasgupta (Penn State), Rupert A. C. Croft & Tiziana Di Matteo (Carnegie Mellon), Yueying Ni (Harvard), Simeon Bird (UC Riverside) and Yin Li (Shenzhen University, China). It presents a method of achieving super-resolution to rapidly enhance low-resolution runs with statistically correct fine details to generate accurate simulations and mock observations for large galaxy surveys and was published on Monday 10th February 2025 in the folder marked Cosmology and NonGalactic Astrophysics.
You can find the officially accepted version of this paper on arXiv here.
The Rodgers & Hart standard My Funny Valentine has been recorded well over a thousand times, with superb jazz versions by Chet Baker and Miles Davis among many others. This is one of my favourites, the result of a 1962 collaboration between pianist Bill Evans and guitarist Jim Hall on the album Undercurrent
I’m taking the liberty of reblogging this post about the Royal Society’s inaction in the case of Elon Musk. I urge you to read the post. As I said in a previous article:
The venerable Royal Society still counts him as a Fellow, despite his overtly antiscientific dissemination of false information and his support for far-right extremism. I don’t know how Musk was elected an FRS in 2018, perhaps before the worst of his character became widely known, but the fact that he remains a Fellow tarnishes the reputation of that organization.
The strategic case for this Chair revolves around broader developments in the area of astrophysics and cosmology at Maynooth. Currently there are two groups active in research in these areas, one in the former Department of Experimental Physics (which is largely focussed on astronomical instrumentation) and the other, in the former Department of Theoretical Physics, which is theoretical and computational. We want to promote closer collaboration between these research strands. The idea with the new position is that the holder will nucleate and lead a research programme in the area between these existing groups as well as getting involved in outreach and public engagement.
It is intended that the position to appeal not only to people undertaking observational programmes using ground-based facilities (e.g. those provided by ESO, which Ireland recently joined), or those exploiting data from space-based experiments, such as Euclid, as well as people working on multi-messenger astrophysics, gravitational waves, and so on.
P. S. For those of you reading this from outside Ireland the job includes a proper public service pension, a defined benefit scheme way better than the UK’s USS.
I forgot to mention that last week I had to run the first Computational Physics laboratory session of the year. When I was setting things up before the session I saw that we had a different version of the operating system on our cluster from what we had two years ago when I last taught this module. More importantly, all the student accounts had been provided with this desktop background image…
What better way to start a cold February morning than with a lovely image from Euclid? The picture above on the left shows an image of the galaxy NGC 6505 and on the right a closer view of the central portion that reveals a near perfect Einstein Ring. This phenomenon is caused by gravitational lensing and is quite a rare occurrence because it requires a perfect alignment between a background source, a concentration of mass that acts as a lens, and the observer (in this case the Euclid telescope):
This find is all the more extraordinary because it was made using observations made during Euclid’s commissioning phase when the telescope was not yet fully focussed. The first release of (a small sample) of full-quality data from Euclid – the so-called Q1 release – will actually be announced next month.
The published paper by O’Riordan et al is available here, from which I have taken this image showing the two relationship between the two images above:
There has already been quite a lot of media coverage of this discovery (even in Ireland). Here is the Press Release from the European Space Agency explaining the background and some comments from people involved in the work:
–0–
Euclid blasted off on its six-year mission to explore the dark Universe on 1 July 2023. Before the spacecraft could begin its survey, the team of scientists and engineers on Earth had to make sure everything was working properly. During this early testing phase, in September 2023, Euclid sent some images back to Earth. They were deliberately out of focus, but in one fuzzy image Euclid Archive Scientist Bruno Altieri saw a hint of a very special phenomenon and decided to take a closer look.
“I look at the data from Euclid as it comes in,” explains Bruno. “Even from that first observation, I could see it, but after Euclid made more observations of the area, we could see a perfect Einstein ring. For me, with a lifelong interest in gravitational lensing, that was amazing.”
The Einstein Ring, an extremely rare phenomenon, turned out to be hiding in plain sight in a galaxy not far away. The galaxy, called NGC 6505, is around 590 million light-years from Earth, a stone’s throw away in cosmic terms. But this is the first time that the ring of light surrounding its centre is detected, thanks to Euclid’s high-resolution instruments.
The ring around the foreground galaxy is made up of light from a farther out bright galaxy. This background galaxy is 4.42 billion light-years away, and its light has been distorted by gravity on its way to us. The far-away galaxy hasn’t been observed before and doesn’t yet have a name.
“An Einstein ring is an example of strong gravitational lensing,” explains Conor O’Riordan, of the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Germany, and lead author of the first scientific paper analysing the ring. “All strong lenses are special, because they’re so rare, and they’re incredibly useful scientifically. This one is particularly special, because it’s so close to Earth and the alignment makes it very beautiful.”
Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity predicts that light will bend around objects in space, so that they focus the light like a giant lens. This gravitational lensing effect is bigger for more massive objects – galaxies and clusters of galaxies. It means we can sometimes see the light from distant galaxies that would otherwise be hidden.
If the alignment is just right, the light from the distant source galaxy bends to form a spectacular ring around the foreground object. These Einstein rings are a rich laboratory for scientists. Studying their gravitational effects can help us learn about the expansion of the Universe, detect the effects of invisible dark matter and dark energy, and investigate the background source whose light is bent by dark matter in between us and the source.
“I find it very intriguing that this ring was observed within a well-known galaxy, which was first discovered in 1884,” says Valeria Pettorino, ESA Euclid Project Scientist. “The galaxy has been known to astronomers for a very long time. And yet this ring was never observed before. This demonstrates how powerful Euclid is, finding new things even in places we thought we knew well. This discovery is very encouraging for the future of the Euclid mission and demonstrates its fantastic capabilities.
By exploring how the Universe has expanded and formed over its cosmic history, Euclid will reveal more about the role of gravity and the nature of dark energy and dark matter. The space telescope will map more than a third of the sky, observing billions of galaxies out to 10 billion light-years. It is expected to find around 100 000 strong lenses, but to find one that’s so spectacular – and so close to home – is astonishing. Until now, less than 1000 strong lenses were known, and even fewer were imaged at high resolution.
“Euclid is going to revolutionise the field, with all this data we’ve never had before,” adds Conor.
Although this Einstein ring is stunning, Euclid’s main job is searching for the more subtle effects of weak gravitational lensing, where background galaxies appear only mildly stretched or displaced. To detect this effect, scientists will need to analyse billions of galaxies. Euclid began its detailed survey of the sky on 14 February 2024 and is gradually creating the most extensive 3D map of the Universe yet. Such an amazing find, so early in its mission, means Euclid is on course to uncover many more hidden secrets.
The views presented here are personal and not necessarily those of my employer (or anyone else for that matter).
Feel free to comment on any of the posts on this blog but comments may be moderated; anonymous comments and any considered by me to be vexatious and/or abusive and/or defamatory will not be accepted. I do not necessarily endorse, support, sanction, encourage, verify or agree with the opinions or statements of any information or other content in the comments on this site and do not in any way guarantee their accuracy or reliability.
In the Dark 