I’ve been slow onto a result which was announced last week concerning the detection weak gravitational lensing in the cluster Abell 2390 by the Euclid spacecraft and its use to determine the distribution of dark matter in the cluster. You can find a full discussion of the result here and the scientific paper is here.
The analysis was based on Early Release Observations of the cluster, a pretty picture of which are shown here:
(The little blue patches are artefacts caused by internal reflections in the VIS instrument and can be dealt with in software.)
According to general relativity, the presence of any mass bends the path of light passing near it, producing gravitational lensing. The most famous examples of this are the giant arcs and multiple images associated with strong gravitational lensing, but these are very rare as they require good alignment between observer, lens and source.. Most lines of sight in the universe do not satisfy this condition so are in the weak lensing regime. Even in such cases, however, the presence of the foreground mass can be detected, by way of a systematic alignment in the orientation of background sources around the lensing mass. A circular background image would be distorted into an ellipse by this process. Unfortunately galaxies aren’t circular but are approximately elliptical, so the shape of each source is changed from an ellipse to differently shaped ellipse. The distortion is therefore impossible to detect in a single background source because we don’t know the intrinsic orientation of the galaxy, but the distortion of different sources is correlated in a particular way. Weak gravitational lensing is thus an intrinsically statistical measurement, but it provides a way to measure the masses of astronomical objects without requiring assumptions about their composition or dynamical state. Weak gravitational lensing observations are, however technically difficult to carry out and analyse, as one has to be very careful that no correlations are introduced by systematic errors in the optics.
Anyway, they say that a picture paints a thousand words so here are two pictures. On the left we see the shear axes as extracted from the above image and on the right the inferred dark matter distribution. You can slide the bar backwards and forwards to see how the two images relate.
You can see that the shear tends to be aligned tangentially to a line connecting the image to the cluster centre (in the plane of the sky), which is what theory would predict.
There’ll be much more of this sort of analysis in the full Euclid Survey. I hope to be able to give an update about this reasonably soon.
In the Dark 