Archive for The Open Journal of Astrophysics

Weekly Update from the Open Journal of Astrophysics 10/10/2026

Posted in OJAp Papers, Open Access, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on October 10, 2026 by telescoper

It’s Saturday again, so it’s time for another update of activity at the Open Journal of Astrophysics. Since the last update we have published a further eight papers, bringing the number in Volume 9 (2026) to 237 and the total so far published by OJAp up to 685.

I continue to include the posts made on our Mastodon account (on Fediscience); these announcements also contain a clickable form of the DOI for each paper. Our Mastodon account has regular updates and other announcements from OJAp too, including posts from the OJAp blog.

The first new paper this week was published on Monday 5th October in the folder Solar and Stellar Astrophysics. The title of the paper is “Diameters and Temperatures VII: High-angular resolution measurements of Solar-type stars with the CHARA Array” and it isby Tabetha Boyajian (Louisiana State University, USA) and 10 others based in the USA and Australia. This study uses interferometric measurements to determine precise characteristics of 27 nearby solar-type stars, including their radii, effective temperatures, and luminosities. The findings represent benchmarks for testing stellar evolutionary theory.

The overlay for this one is here:

You can find the officially accepted version on arXiv here and the announcement on Fediverse here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Diameters and Temperatures VII: High-angular resolution measurements of Solar-type stars with the CHARA Array" by Tabetha Boyajian (Louisiana State University, USA) and 10 others based in the USA and Australia.

doi.org/10.33232/001c.172090

October 5, 2026, 7:52 am 1 boosts 1 favorites

The second paper for this week, published on Tuesday 6th October, is “The jet-shaped pipe morphology in planetary nebulae and core-collapse supernova remnants” by Jessica Braudo and Noam Soker (Technion, Israel). This article, published in the folder High-Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, he study suggests that jets shape the ‘pipe’ structures in core-collapse supernova remnants and jet-shaped planetary nebulae, based on comparisons with hydrodynamical numerical simulations.

The overlay looks like this:

The official version of the paper can be found on arXiv here and the Fediverse announcement here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "The jet-shaped pipe morphology in planetary nebulae and core-collapse supernova remnants" by Jessica Braudo and Noam Soker (Technion, Israel)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.172148

October 6, 2026, 7:02 am 1 boosts 0 favorites

The third paper of the week, “Balancing bias, baryons, and scale cuts in LSST 3x2pt analysis” is by Ottavia Truttero (U. Edinburgh, UK) and 5 others on behalf of the The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration. It was published on Tuesday 6th October in the folder Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics and presents a new analysis for LSST Y1 and Y10 data, exploring the effects of galaxy bias and baryonic feedback. The article also introduces a new open-source pipeline, MGL.

The overlay for this is here:

The accepted version of this one can be found on the arXiv here and the Mastodon announcement here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Balancing bias, baryons, and scale cuts in LSST 3x2pt analysis" by Ottavia Truttero (U. Edinburgh, UK) and 5 others on behalf of the The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration

doi.org/10.33232/001c.172149

October 6, 2026, 7:26 am 1 boosts 5 favorites

The fourth new paper of the week, published on Wednesday 7th Octonber, in the folder Solar and Stellar Astrophysics, is “High-Precision Differential Radial Velocities of C3PO Wide Binaries: A Test of Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND)” by Serat M. Saad and Yuan-Sen Ting (Ohio State University, USA). The paper describes a technique to measure differential radial velocities of wide-binary stars, improving precision and enabling better analysis of Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND), suggesting tension with current estimates of the acceleration scale.

The overlay is here:

The official version of the paper can be found on arXiv here and the Fediverse announcement here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "High-Precision Differential Radial Velocities of C3PO Wide Binaries: A Test of Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND)" by Serat M. Saad and Yuan-Sen Ting (Ohio State University, USA)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.172194

October 7, 2026, 7:40 am 1 boosts 1 favorites

Paper Number Five for the week is “Simulating the jittering-jets explosion mechanism: circum-jet rings account for observed core-collapse supernova remnant morphologies” by Muhammad Akashi & Noam Soker (Technion, Israel). The study uses 3D simulations to explore core-collapse supernova explosions driven by jets, supporting the jittering jets explosion mechanism theory. The simulations explain observed circum-jet rings in supernova remnants. This was also published on Wednesday 7th October, but in the folder High-Energy Astrophysical Phenomena.

The overlay is here:

The officially-accepted version of the paper can be found on arXiv here and the Fediverse announcement here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Simulating the jittering-jets explosion mechanism: circum-jet rings account for observed core-collapse supernova remnant morphologies" by Muhammad Akashi & Noam Soker (Technion, Israel)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.172195

October 7, 2026, 8:01 am 1 boosts 0 favorites

The sixth paper of the week is “Radio Continuum Study of One of the Brightest Large Magellanic Cloud Supernova Remnant N 132D” by Rami Z. E. Alsaberi (Western Sydney U. Australia) and 7 others. This was the first of three papers published on Friday 9th October, and it is in the folder High-Energy Astrophysical Phenomena. This one presents a radio continuum analysis of the Large Magellanic Cloud supernova remnant N 132D, revealing insights into its magnetic field structure, energetic properties, and particle acceleration.

The officially-accepted version of this paper is on arXiv here and the Mastodon announcement on the fediverse here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Radio Continuum Study of One of the Brightest Large Magellanic Cloud Supernova Remnant N 132D" by Rami Z. E. Alsaberi (Western Sydney U. Australia) and 7 others

doi.org/10.33232/001c.172272

October 9, 2026, 7:20 am 1 boosts 2 favorites

The seventh paper of the week is “New Signs Pointing Toward a Correlation Between Astrophysical Neutrinos and Radio Flares” by Yjan Gordon (U. Wisconsin-Madison), Peter S. Ferguson (U. Washington), Eric J. Hooper & Michael N. Martinez (U. Wisconsin-Madison); all in the USA. This was also published on Friday 7th October, but in the folder Astrophysics of Galaxies. It is very topical, in the light of the award of this year’s Nobel Prize for Physics to Francis Halzen for his work on IceCube. The paper explains how data from VLASS and IceCube Neutrino Observatory reveal a correlation between radio variability and astrophysical neutrino detection, suggesting radio flares contribute to about 13% of astrophysical neutrinos detected by IceCube.

The overlay is here:

The officially accepted version is on arXiv here and the Mastodon announcement here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "New Signs Pointing Toward a Correlation Between Astrophysical Neutrinos and Radio Flares" by Yjan Gordon (U. Wisconsin-Madison), Peter S. Ferguson (U. Washington), Eric J. Hooper & Michael N. Martinez (U. Wisconsin-Madison); all in the USA

doi.org/10.33232/001c.172273

October 9, 2026, 7:36 am 0 boosts 1 favorites

The eighth, and last, of the new papers for this week is “Spectroscopic follow-up of compact object binary candidates from Gaia DR3: White dwarfs, neutron stars, black holes, and the parallax zeropoint” by Kareem El-Badry (Caltech, USA) and an international cast of 14 others. This paper uses data from Gaia DR3 to analyze orbits of binary systems, including potential black holes, neutron stars, and white dwarfs. It was published on Friday 9th October, i.e. yesterday, in the folder Solar and Stellar Astrophysics.

The overlay is here:

The final version of this paper is on the arXiv here and the Mastodon announcement here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Spectroscopic follow-up of compact object binary candidates from Gaia DR3: White dwarfs, neutron stars, black holes, and the parallax zeropoint" by Kareem El-Badry (Caltech, USA) and an international cast of 14 others.

doi.org/10.33232/001c.172274

October 9, 2026, 8:03 am 0 boosts 2 favorites

That concludes this week’s update. We’re still on target to publish over 300 papers and reach the 750 mark by the end of the year. I’ll do another update next week.

Weekly Update from the Open Journal of Astrophysics 03/10/2026

Posted in OJAp Papers, Open Access, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on October 3, 2026 by telescoper

It’s Saturday again, so it’s time for another update of activity at the Open Journal of Astrophysics. Since the last update we have published a further 13 papers, including one correction to an article already published, bringing the number in Volume 9 (2026) to 229 and the total so far published by OJAp up to 677. This would have been a busy week even without the clutch of four MEGATRON papers announced on Wednesday!

I continue to include the posts made on our Mastodon account (on Fediscience); these announcements also contain a clickable form of the DOI for each paper. Our Mastodon account has regular updates and other announcements from OJAp too, including posts from the OJAp blog.

The first new paper this week was published on Tuesday 28th September in the folder Solar and Stellar Astrophysics. The title is “Phlegethon: a fully compressible magnetohydrodynamic code for simulations in stellar astrophysics” and it is by G. Leidi (Heidelberger Institut für Theoretische Studie, Germany) and 14 others. PHLEGETHON is a magnetohydrodynamic code designed for multidimensional simulations in stellar astrophysics, capable of modeling a wide range of dynamical processes in stars. It is publicly accessible online.

The overlay for this one is here:

You can find the officially accepted version on arXiv here and the announcement on Fediverse here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Phlegethon: a fully compressible magnetohydrodynamic code for simulations in stellar astrophysics" by G. Leidi (Heidelberger Institut für Theoretische Studie, Germany) and 14 others.

doi.org/10.33232/001c.171923

September 29, 2026, 7:22 am 1 boosts 0 favorites

The second paper for this week, published on Tuesday 29th September, is “The impact of source and survey modelling on the connection between [O III] emitters and Ly-α forest transmission at z ~ 6” by Luke Conaboy (U. Nottingham, UK) and 5 others based in the UK, India and Germany. This study improves theoretical work on the connection between galaxies and the intergalactic medium, using an empirical model and James Webb Space Telescope surveys. It is in the folder marked Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics.

The overlay looks like this:

The official version of the paper can be found on arXiv here and the Fediverse announcement here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "The impact of source and survey modelling on the connection between [O III] emitters and Ly-α forest transmission at z ~ 6" by Luke Conaboy (U. Nottingham, UK) and 5 others based in the UK, India and Germany.

doi.org/10.33232/001c.171924

September 29, 2026, 7:38 am 1 boosts 2 favorites

Next we have four related papers produced by the MEGATRON Project, led by Harley Katz (U. Chicago) and Martin Rey (U. Bath, UK), Corentin Cadiou (IAP Paris, France). These were all published on Wednesday 30th September in the folder Astrophysics of Galaxies.

I mentioned this in a separate blog post here, so I won’t describe them in detail again here. Here are the four overlays:

The Mastodon announcement for these is in the form of a thread:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

Today we have published four related papers produced by the MEGATRON Project, led by Harley Katz (U. Chicago) and Martin Rey (U. Bath, UK), Corentin Cadiou (IAP Paris, France)

These articles are announced in the following thread:

September 30, 2026, 1:24 pm 1 boosts 1 favorites

The four papers can be found on arXiv here, here, here and here.

The four MEGATRON papers were not the only ones published on Wednesday 30th September, however. We published “The Chirp-Mass Ladder: A New Rung Emerges” by Vaibhav Tiwari (U. Birmingham, UK) in the folder High-Energy Astrophysical Phenomena on that day too. This paper presents an analysis of 256 binary black-hole (BBH) events, suggesting a hierarchical merger scenario to explain the structured mass distribution, and encouraging further investigation into hierarchical mergers’ role in the BBH population. The overlay for this is here:

The accepted version of this one can be found on the arXiv here and the Mastodon announcement here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "The Chirp-Mass Ladder: A New Rung Emerges" by Vaibhav Tiwari (U. Birmingham, UK)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.171978

September 30, 2026, 4:39 pm 0 boosts 2 favorites

The eighth new paper of the week, published on Thursday 1st October 2026, in the folder Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, is “A Consistent Implementation of Cluster Strong Lensing in Cosmological Simulation Light Cones” by Cian Roche (MIT, USA) and 11 others based in the USA, Germany and Italy.

The overlay is here:

The official version of the paper can be found on arXiv here and the Fediverse announcement here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Kinematics of the Weak Cool-Core Cluster A3571 Observed with XRISM: Low Cooling Rate Balanced by Low Heating Rate?" by Hannah McCall (U. Chicago, USA) and 12 others based around the world.

doi.org/10.33232/001c.171549

September 22, 2026, 7:13 am 0 boosts 1 favorites

We now have four papers all published on Friday 2nd October (i.e. yesterday).

The first of this batch is “Analytical weak-lensing shear response of galaxy model fitting” by Xiangchong Li (Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA). This is in the folder marked Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics: it explores how galaxy model fitting responds to weak-lensing shear distortions using a new algebraic system, quintuple numbers, within the AnaCal framework, keeping multiplicative bias low.

The overlay is here:

The officially-accepted version of the paper can be found on arXiv here and the Fediverse announcement here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Analytical weak-lensing shear response of galaxy model fitting" by Xiangchong Li (Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.172037

October 2, 2026, 6:11 am 1 boosts 1 favorites

The 10th paper of the week is “Evidence for inefficient dust production in a massive, metal-rich galaxy at z=7.13 uncovered by JWST and ALMA” by Kasper E. Heintz (Cosmic Dawn Center, Copenhagen, Denmark) and 19 others in Europe, UK and USA. This article, published on Friday 2nd October 2026, in the folder Astrophysics of Galaxies, analyzes cosmic dust in high redshift galaxies, specifically A1689-zD1, using data from JWST and ALMA, suggesting dust formation and destruction processes differ for galaxies in the early Universe.

The officially-accepted version of this paper is on arXiv here and the Mastodon announcement on the fediverse here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Evidence for inefficient dust production in a massive, metal-rich galaxy at z=7.13 uncovered by JWST and ALMA" by Kasper E. Heintz (Cosmic Dawn Center, Copenhagen, Denmark) and 19 others in Europe, UK and USA.

doi.org/10.33232/001c.172038

October 2, 2026, 6:34 am 2 boosts 3 favorites

The 11th paper of the week is “Starbursts hiding in the main sequence: a pathway toward quenching?” by Florent Renaud (Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg, France) and 12 others based in France and UK. This article explores the “starbursts in the main sequence” (SBMSs) that intermittently appear in galaxy evolution, attributing their existence to earlier stellar mass assembly and frequent mergers. It was published on Friday 2nd October 2026, in the folder Astrophysics of Galaxies.

The overlay is here:

The officially accepted version is on arXiv here and the Mastodon announcement here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Starbursts hiding in the main sequence: a pathway toward quenching?" by Florent Renaud (Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg, France) and 12 others based in France and UK.

doi.org/10.33232/001c.172039

October 2, 2026, 6:49 am 1 boosts 1 favorites

The twelfth, and last, of the new papers for this week is “Ring Position Angles and Spin in M87* and Sgr A*” by Nicholas S. Conroy (U. Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA) and 6 others all based in the USA. This was also published on Friday 2nd October but in the folder High-Energy Astrophysical Phenomena.

The overlay is here:

The final version of this paper is on the arXiv here and the Mastodon announcement here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Ring Position Angles and Spin in M87* and Sgr A*" by Nicholas S. Conroy (U. Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA) and 6 others all based in the USA.

doi.org/10.33232/001c.172040

October 2, 2026, 7:02 am 1 boosts 0 favorites

And finally, on Monday 28th September we announced one (minor) correction to a previously published article. The overlay of the correction notice is here:

The mastodon announcement is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

Correction Notice issued at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "CORRECTION – TDCOSMO XXVI: Uniform Lens Modeling of Eight Doubly Imaged Quasars" by Brady et al. (originally published 7th August 2026).

doi.org/10.33232/001c.171886

September 28, 2026, 7:49 am 0 boosts 0 favorites

The corrected version of this paper can be found on arXiv here.

That concludes this week’s update. As things are going we seem likely to publish over 300 papers this year, and may reach the 750 mark by the end of the year too. I’ll do another update next week.

The arXiv limit

Posted in Artificial Intelligence, Open Access with tags , , on October 2, 2026 by telescoper

Putting my community service hat on, I thought I would relay  an announcement on the arXiv blog that it is introducing a limit on the rate that any individual can submit papers to arXiv. To start with, the limit will be two per month. This limit applies to the submitter, not to all the authors, so I think large collaborations will find a way around it by having different co-authors do the submissions.

The reason for this limit is very clear:

The rate of submissions is currently growing in an uncontrolled and alarming way. Most of this growth is driven by AI, which makes it very easy for authors to flood the arXiv with boilerplate papers. All this is making life impossible for the moderators. It will be very interesting to see if this move manages to stem the tide.

If you have any questions, please read the FAQ on the page here. One thing I’m not sure about is whether the limit applies to replacements as well as new submissions. It doesn’t seem to be addressed in the FAQs.

A MEGATRON Day!

Posted in OJAp Papers, Open Access, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , on September 30, 2026 by telescoper

Today we published four papers at the Open Journal of Astrophysics all related to the Megatron Project which is co-led by Martin Rey of the University of Bath (UK), Harley Katz of the University of Chicago (USA) and Corentin Cadiou of the Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris in France. I will include this quartet in my regular weekly update on Saturday but there is a press release accompanying these publications so I thought I’d splash them a bit here too.

I’ll show the overlays on Saturday but in the meantime here are some pretty graphics from three of the papers:

In no particular order the four papers are:

MEGATRON: Reproducing the Diversity of High-Redshift Galaxy Spectra with Cosmological Radiation Hydrodynamics Simulations

MEGATRON: how the first stars can create an iron metallicity plateau in the smallest dwarf galaxies

MEGATRON: the impact of non-equilibrium effects and local radiation fields on the circumgalactic medium at cosmic noon”

MEGATRON: The Physical Origins of Steep UV Slopes at high redshift

The Press Release from the University of Bath is reproduced below. A Press Release in French can be found here.

–o–

New simulations connect the first stars to cosmic fingerprints still visible today

International MEGATRON project links space telescope observations of the infant Universe with the chemical fossil record of the Milky Way.

Researchers have used some of the most detailed simulations yet of the early Universe to investigate how the first stars and galaxies formed.

Led by researchers at the University of Bath, alongside collaborators at the University of Chicago in the US and the Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris in France, the MEGATRON project uses advanced simulations to explore how the first stars and galaxies lit up the previously dark cosmos and enriched it with the chemical elements that would later become the building blocks of everything around us.

Published today in the Open Journal of Astrophysics, four studies from the MEGATRON project combine cutting-edge cosmological simulations with sophisticated models of radiation, chemistry and galaxy formation. Together, these constitute the collaboration’s first substantial body of published results, with further papers expected to follow.

The findings from the study of the first stars show that accurately capturing the interplay between starlight, gas and newly forged elements is essential for connecting two previously separate views of the early Universe: observations of young galaxies by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and the chemical clues preserved in ancient stars in and around the Milky Way – the galaxy that contains our Solar System.

JWST provides a direct view of galaxies in the infant Universe, while ancient stars act as a fossil record of cosmic history. By studying the chemical fingerprints of these ancient stars, astronomers can reconstruct the properties of the first stars and trace how they enriched the cosmos with the first chemical elements.

The simulations follow the evolution of a young galaxy that will eventually grow into a system similar in mass to the Milky Way. Using advanced computer models that simultaneously track the movement of gas, the propagation of starlight and the evolution of chemical concentrations, the team investigated how stars shape the gas in and around galaxies over billions of years.

The study suggests that simplified models may underestimate the influence of stellar radiation and complex chemical processes on the gas surrounding galaxies. By modelling these effects at exceptionally high resolution, the team resolved structures in the gas that are not captured by simpler models, helping to improve predictions for current and future astronomical observations.

A direct glimpse of the infant cosmos

Dr Martin Rey from the Department of Physics at the University of Bath and a lead contributor to the MEGATRON collaboration, said: “The James Webb Space Telescope gives us a direct glimpse of the infant cosmos, while stellar archaeology allows us to study the relics of those earliest times in our own Galactic neighbourhood. MEGATRON provides a physical bridge between the two.”

The simulations begin with pristine gas containing no heavy elements, mirroring conditions shortly after the Big Bang. They then follow the birth of the first stars, the radiation they emit, the supernova explosions that mark their deaths and the dispersal of newly forged elements into subsequent generations of stars and galaxies.

Understanding this process is central to one of astronomy’s most fundamental questions: where the elements that make up today’s Universe came from.

Dr Rey said: “The elements that make our world and life possible – carbon, oxygen, iron and many others – were forged by stars. To understand where those elements came from, we need to understand how the first stars formed and enriched their surroundings. MEGATRON allows us to test these ideas directly by comparing detailed simulations with observations from JWST and the chemical fingerprints preserved in ancient stars.”

Looking ahead, the team plans to use MEGATRON to strengthen links between theory and emerging observational data. As JWST continues to transform our understanding of the earliest galaxies, large-scale stellar surveys will provide increasingly detailed information about ancient stars in and around the Milky Way.

Dr Rey and his colleagues at Bath are already developing the next generation of simulations. The project has been awarded 40 million processor hours on the UK’s national supercomputers, equivalent to running five million laptops in parallel for a year. These resources will enable simulations with higher resolution and more complete physical models, allowing even more direct comparisons with JWST observations and the chemical fossil record preserved in ancient stars.

“MEGATRON provides a common physical framework for interpreting two of astronomy’s most exciting new datasets: JWST’s view of the earliest galaxies and the stellar fossil record,” said Dr Rey. “Together, these complementary observations allow us to test competing models of the first stars in ways that weren’t previously possible.”

The MEGATRON project started in 2023 and is scheduled to run until 2030.

The Number of the Beast

Posted in OJAp Papers with tags , , , , on September 28, 2026 by telescoper

It won’t last past tomorrow, so I thought I’d post this today:

According to the Book of Revelation (Chapter 13 Verse 18):

Here is wisdom: Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man; and his number is six hundred threescore and six.

Does this mean that the Open Journal of Astrophysics is officially a beast?

The Open Journal of Astrophysics is a Q1 Journal

Posted in Open Access with tags , , , , on September 25, 2026 by telescoper

I was a meeting this morning about other things during the course of which I found out that, as of 2025, the Open Journal of Astrophysics is a Q1 journal. This means that according to certain bibliometric criteria, OJAp is in the first quartile (i.e. top 25%) of journals in its field. You can find a table with all journals in Astronomy and Astrophysics curated by SCImago here. I searched the list for all the journals that are classified as Diamond Open Access and found that we’re the only one:

As with many of these bibliometric things the data are incorrect. We actually published 212 papers in 2025. The number of citations is wildly wrong too – the true figure is much higher. I presume that the number of documents (3 years) is 2022+2023+2024, which is the correct number if that’s what it is meant to represent.

My main objection to journal indicators like this (apart from the fact that they’re usually riddled with errors) is that nowadays it is quite easy to extract citation information at the article level so there’s no reason to use a metric associated with the journal to judge the quality of a paper. It’s like judging a book by its cover. I hate Journal Impact Factor for similar reasons; see posts here.

For this reason I don’t personally care at all about whether OJAp is Q1 or Q2 or whatever. I do recognize, however, that many astronomers and astrophysicists work in countries where the funding agencies do not count papers unless they are in Q1 journals. I think that’s silly, but it’s a fact of life.

If the only reason you were not submitting papers to OJAp was that it wasn’t a Q1 journal then you can start submitting them now!

A “Full House” at the Open Journal of Astrophysics!

Posted in OJAp Papers, Open Access, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , on August 26, 2026 by telescoper

In my recent weekly updates of activity at the Open Journal of Astrophysics, the latest of which is here, I’ve remarked that we had built up quite a backlog of papers accepted but yet to be published. This is no doubt due to August being a holiday for many researchers. Well, we seem to be catching up rather rapidly. So far this week we have published eight new papers, and it’s only Wednesday!

The recent burst of activity has led to us establishing a first, a week in which we have published a full house of at least one paper in each of the six sections of astro-ph on the arXiv. As a reminder, these are they:

  1. astro-ph.GA – Astrophysics of Galaxies. Phenomena pertaining to galaxies or the Milky Way. Star clusters, HII regions and planetary nebulae, the interstellar medium, atomic and molecular clouds, dust. Stellar populations. Galactic structure, formation, dynamics. Galactic nuclei, bulges, disks, halo. Active Galactic Nuclei, supermassive black holes, quasars. Gravitational lens systems. The Milky Way and its contents
  2. astro-ph.CO – Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics. Phenomenology of early universe, cosmic microwave background, cosmological parameters, primordial element abundances, extragalactic distance scale, large-scale structure of the universe. Groups, superclusters, voids, intergalactic medium. Particle astrophysics: dark energy, dark matter, baryogenesis, leptogenesis, inflationary models, reheating, monopoles, WIMPs, cosmic strings, primordial black holes, cosmological gravitational radiation
  3. astro-ph.EP – Earth and Planetary Astrophysics. Interplanetary medium, planetary physics, planetary astrobiology, extrasolar planets, comets, asteroids, meteorites. Structure and formation of the solar system
  4. astro-ph.HE – High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena. Cosmic ray production, acceleration, propagation, detection. Gamma ray astronomy and bursts, X-rays, charged particles, supernovae and other explosive phenomena, stellar remnants and accretion systems, jets, microquasars, neutron stars, pulsars, black holes
  5. astro-ph.IM – Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics. Detector and telescope design, experiment proposals. Laboratory Astrophysics. Methods for data analysis, statistical methods. Software, database design
  6. astro-ph.SR – Solar and Stellar Astrophysics. White dwarfs, brown dwarfs, cataclysmic variables. Star formation and protostellar systems, stellar astrobiology, binary and multiple systems of stars, stellar evolution and structure, coronas. Central stars of planetary nebulae. Helioseismology, solar neutrinos, production and detection of gravitational radiation from stellar systems.

As of yesterday we had published in five of the six categories and were only missing a paper (in Number 4 – High-Energy Astrophysical Phenomena). Today, right on cue, from the queue, came this paper to complete the set:

There’s still a couple of days to go and we have more papers in the pipeline so it looks like I’ll have a busy time on Saturday morning when I do the next update!

Our Two-Million-Dollar Journal!

Posted in Open Access with tags , , , , on August 25, 2026 by telescoper

It’s exactly a year since I pointed out that the Open Journal of Astrophysics had saved the astrophysics research community worldwide a sum in excess of a million dollars in publication costs.

The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publishing a paper in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (MNRAS) is now £2356. Converting that to dollars at current rates (£1=$1.36) gives about $3200 per paper.

As of today, 25th August 2026, the Open Journal of Astrophysics has published 632 articles. Using the dollar cost of an MNRAS APC as a benchmark – many journals charge more – this means that we have now saved the global astrophysics community over $2M (for a total outlay of around $15K).

Yes, we are still a small journal but the size of that figure should help you understand how much money is being wasted globally on publishing fees that could instead be spent on actual research.

It’s good to see that more and more researchers are seeing the light and switching to Diamond Open Access. Today we published the 184th article in Volume 9 (2026) of the Open Journal of Astrophysics. At the end of August we will be about two-thirds of the way through the year so I expect we will publish more than 270 articles this year. I also expect that less than a year from now we will have saved our third million dollars.

I’d like to take this opportunity to thank everyone involved in running this journal: the Editors, staff at Maynooth University Library who help us, the host of volunteer referees, and of course our authors. I’m confident that, together, we can change the publishing landscape in astrophysics, and put the power (and money) back in the hands of researchers instead of greedy publishers.

This is a slightly-edited version of a post I made yesterday, when we had published four fewer papers, for the Open Journal of Astrophysics blog.

News from arXiv…

Posted in Open Access with tags , , , , , , on August 2, 2026 by telescoper

I saw recently an announcement that arXiv – which recently became a standalone nonprofit organization – now hosts more than three million articles. That message took me to a post on the arXiv blog from which I learnt that said blog is on WordPress which makes it possible to include embedded links from this WordPress blog, i.e.:

This in turn reminded me to answer a question that people sometimes ask about the Open Journal of Astrophysics, namely what would happen if arXiv went offline? Since OJAp is an arXiv-overlay journal this would appear to be fatal. We have been keeping duplicates of all the papers we publish, and associated metadata, in a local repository so that if arXiv went down we could reistate them fairly quickly. All we would need to do is alter the overlay to point to a different web address: there is no reason at all why the overlay idea can’t be adapted to other forms of repository.

Recently, however, arXiv decided to do a similar thing for all its articles. Here is a blog post about it:

I blogged about the first stage of this here.

Anyway, if you use arXiv at all – which will include most astrophysicists – then it would be a good idea to follow the arXiv blog as there is very important news on it, including information about alterations to the schedule of announcements.

A Ban on Publication Fees?

Posted in Open Access with tags , , , , , , on July 21, 2026 by telescoper

Yesterday I was going through the “onboarding” process via Zoom with two new Editors at the Open Journal of Astrophysics (OJAp) when one of them mentioned a recent policy decision at the USA which means we’ll probably get even more papers submitted from there. I wasn’t aware of the decision, but there’s an article in the Times Higher about it here.

In a nutshell:

Under proposed rule changes published by the Office of Management and Budget, all journal publication costs – “including page charges, article processing charges (APCs), or similar fees such as open access fees for professional journal publications and other peer-reviewed publications” – will become “unallowable under federal awards”.

It is important to stress that at this stage the change is proposed rather than actual and it remains to be seen whether it will stand. I think it should because publication fees, article processing charges or whatever you call them are a complete waste of money.

The Times Higher article frames this as “Trump’s ban on paying open access fees”. I was worried to be finding myself in agreement with Donald Trump on anything, but I very much doubt that Trump himself knows anything about scientific publishing or has had much of a hand in this decision. It seems to me to be eminently sensible to ensure that funds meant to be directed at research are not frittered away on page charges. If I were involved in running a research institution I would make it a disciplinary offence to spend money on publication fees.

Of course the academic publishing industry is upset about the proposal claiming that scientific publishing is “high cost”, which it is but only because the publishers rake in huge profits. The way forward, as I have argued many times (e.g. here), is Diamond Open Access, a exemplified by OJAp. The marginal cost per paper article published for OJAp is just $10 and we have at least as much impact as the other leading journals in astrophysics.

I have been surprised how many researchers from the USA are already using OJAp, including many from top institutions such as Harvard, Caltech, Princeton and Chicago. The surprise is basically that authors from the USA have for many years been used to paying page charges for publishing in the Astrophysical Journal and others from the AAS stable. This was the case even before digital journals came on the scene and well before the Open Access movement. I suppose American authors put up with page charges because they felt they had to, but that is no longer the case.

Will we get even more submissions from the USA as a result of this policy change? We’ll just have to wait and see…

P.S. This morning I published the 600th paper at the Open Journal of Astrophysics.