It was rather warm yesterday, even near sunset, so I found myself sitting out on my balcony, staring out into the distance, with a small bottle of wine by my side, and decided to record the view. Off in the distance, with the flashing lights, is the Montjuïc Communications Tower, which was built to transmit television signals from the 1992 Barcelona Olympics. To the left you can see the dome and spires of the Palau Nacional. The traffic noise is authentic.
Author Archive
No ERC Advanced Grants for Ireland…
Posted in Politics with tags Advanced Grants, ERC, European Research Council, Horizon Europe on April 14, 2024 by telescoperI noticed last week that the results of the latest round of ERC Advanced Grants under the European Union’s Horizon Europe programme have been announced. This is the outcome of the 2023 round of applications.
First of all, many congratulations to the 255 recipients of almost €652 million in grants across all disciplines! There are some names I recognize among the awardees, which is very nice to see.
Unfortunately, not one cent of that money will be coming to Ireland as not one researcher based in Ireland is among the winners. Here’s the breakdown of awards:
Germany heads the table, with the UK in second – though, if I understand correctly, there is no ERC money attached to the UK awards in this round because the association agreement between the UK and Horizon Europe was only signed in September 2023 and will only come into play from the 2024 round onwards. Funds for these grants will have to be provided by the UK Government.
The outcome for Ireland is dismal but hardly surprising. Ireland spends only around 1% of its GDP on Research and Development, and only a small part of that is in research grants. There simply isn’t a funding stream to nurture a environment that would allow research to flourish here as it does in other countries. It is true that Ireland is a much smaller country than those at the top table, but it is massively out-performed by nations of a similar size such as Denmark, Finland and Norway. Advanced Grant winners represent the tip of the research pyramid, but they require a solid platform on which to build. In Ireland that platform simply doesn’t exist.
It often seems that Irish politicians think Ireland’s universities exist for the sole purpose of training people to work for Google. At any rate they are unconvinced that academic research is important enough to fund adequately, and this is unlikely to change in the near future as this issue is unlikely to be on the agenda at all for forthcoming election campaigns. The systemic failure of successive governments to invest in R&D, even when running a healthy budget surplus, is just one example of the short-termism that plagues Irish politics. Until attitudes change, talented young researchers, who could contribute so much to the scientific, technological and cultural landscape here, will continue to leave to carry out their research elsewhere.
Citations from Beyond the Grave
Posted in Uncategorized with tags bibliometrics, citation, citations, death, h-index, research, Research Excellence Framework, writing on April 11, 2024 by telescoperIt seems to be widely believed (by those responsible for research assessment) that what is important about research papers and their authors is not the research they describe but how many citations they attract. Thinking about this recently yet another anomaly in this attitude struck me arising from the fact that papers continue to attract citations long after the authors are dead. It seems surprising therefore institutions have not tried harder to use the citations of deceased researchers to boost their research profile. The last Research Excellence Framework in the UK allowed institutions to claim some credit for work by researchers who had moved on to another institution. Why then not allow institutions to claim credit for researchers who passed away?
The obvious problem with this idea is that it might encourage University managers to do even more than they do already to work their staff into an early grave. It seems to me the answer to that is obvious. Researchers should be allowed to stipulate in their last will and testament whom they would like to benefit from post-mortem citations. Or indeed carry some form of donor card…
The free market solution would of course be to set up a market to allow the citations accrued after death of a researcher to be traded.
Another anomaly is that the deceased are generally – though see here for an exception – not allowed to be authors on new papers. I think this is highly discriminatory. You might argue that a dead person can contribute neither to the writing of a paper nor contribute to the scientific discussions that led to it, nor even read a draft of the text, yet I have first-hand experience of many living people who do none of those things yet still manage to appear in the author lists of many papers…
Finally, let me remark that a researcher’s H-index, a quantity often used by institutions to inform decisions about promotion, also continues to increase after the researcher has kicked the bucket. Why, then, should the dead be barred from promotion? Perhaps there should be a new job category of PHR (PostHumous Researcher)? The departed could even take up senior management positions where they could do just as good a job as those in such positions already without incurring any salary costs. This approach could address many of the grave problems facing modern universities.
It is high time institutions adopted a much more inclusive approach to their late researchers who, instead of merely pushing up the daises, could be used to push up the citations.
The Escape Ladder – Joan Miró
Posted in Art with tags Art, Joan Miró, painting, The Escape Ladder on April 10, 2024 by telescoper
by Joan Miró (1940, gouache, watercolor, and ink on paper, 38cm × 46 cm, The Museum of Modern Art, New York City )
The Gates Foundation and Open Access
Posted in Open Access with tags Article Processing Charge, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Diamond Open Access, Open Access, Peer Review, Publishing on April 9, 2024 by telescoperThere has been quite a lot of reaction (e.g. here) to the recent announcement of a new Open Access Policy by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which is one of the one of the world’s top funders of biomedical research. This mandates the distribution of research it funds as preprints and also states that it will not pay Article Processing Charges (APCs). The essentials of the policy, which comes into effect on 1st January 2025, are these:
- Funded Manuscripts Will Be Available. As soon as possible and to the extent feasible, Funded Manuscripts shall be published as a preprint in a preprint server recognized by the foundation or preapproved preprint server which applies a sufficient level of scrutiny to submissions. Accepted articles shall be deposited immediately upon publication in PubMed Central (PMC), or in another openly accessible repository, with proper metadata tagging identifying Gates funding. In addition, grantees shall disseminate Funded Manuscripts as described in their funding agreements with the foundation, including as described in any proposal or Global Access commitments.
- Dissemination of Funded Manuscripts Will Be On “Open Access” Terms. All Funded Manuscripts, including any subsequent updates to key conclusions, shall be available immediately, without any embargo, under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) or an equivalent license. This will permit all users to copy, redistribute, transform, and build on the material in any medium or format for any purpose (including commercial) without further permission or fees being required.
- Gates Grantees Will Retain Copyright. Grantees shall retain sufficient copyright in Funded Manuscripts to ensure such Funded Manuscripts are deposited into an open-access repository and published under the CC-BY 4.0 or equivalent license.
- Underlying Data Will Be Accessible Immediately. The Foundation requires that underlying data supporting the Funded Manuscripts shall be made accessible immediately and as open as possible upon availability of the Funded Manuscripts, subject to any applicable ethical, legal, or regulatory requirements or restrictions. All Funded Manuscripts must be accompanied by an Underlying Data Availability Statement that describes where any primary data, associated metadata, original software, and any additional relevant materials or information necessary to understand, assess, and replicate the Funded Manuscripts findings in totality can be found. Grantees are encouraged to adhere to the FAIR principles to improve the findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reuse of digital assets.
- The Foundation Will Not Pay Article Processing Charges (APC). Any publication fees are the responsibility of the grantees and their co-authors.
- Compliance Is A Requirement of Funding. This Open Access policy applies to all Funded Manuscripts, whether the funding is in whole or in part. Compliance will be continuously reviewed, and grantees and authors will be contacted when they are non-compliant.
- As appropriate, Grantees should include the following acknowledgment and notice in Funded Manuscripts:
- “This work was supported, in whole or in part, by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [Grant number]. The conclusions and opinions expressed in this work are those of the author(s) alone and shall not be attributed to the Foundation. Under the grant conditions of the Foundation, a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License has already been assigned to the Author Accepted Manuscript version that might arise from this submission. Please note works submitted as a preprint have not undergone a peer review process.”
Reactions to this new policy are generally positive, except (unsurprisingly) for the academic publishing industry.
For what it’s worth, my view is that it is a good policy, and I wish more funders went along this route, but it falls short of being truly excellent. As it stands, the policy seems to encourage authors to put the “final” version of their articles in traditional journals, without these articles being freely available through Open Access. That falls short of goal establishing a global worldwide network of institutional and/or subject-based repositories, linked to peer review mechanisms such as overlays, that share research literature freely for the common good. To help achieve that aim, the Gates’ Foundation should to encourage overlays rather than traditional journals as the way to carry out peer review. Perhaps this will be the next step?
Enjoy the Eclipse, but watch out for the cosmologists and druids!
Posted in Biographical, The Universe and Stuff with tags astronomy, Eclipse, Solar Eclipse, total eclipse, Total Eclipse of the Sun, total solar eclipse on April 7, 2024 by telescoperAhead of tomorrow’s total eclipse of the Sun visible from a large part of the USA, I can’t resist sharing this excerpt from The Times warning about the consequences of a mass influx of people to Cornwall for the total eclipse of the Sun that was visible on August 11th 1999, almost 25 years ago. No doubt there are similar things going around about tomorrow’s eclipse:
I did write a letter to the Times complaining that, as a cosmologist, I felt this was very insulting… to druids. They didn’t publish it.
Anyway, I did get to see the total solar eclipse of 1999, not from Cornwall (where it was overcast and rainy) but from the island of Alderney (one of the Channel Islands). There was quite a lot of cloud cover in the morning of the big event so I was expecting to be disappointed. Indeed, the very start of the eclipse was hidden by cloud and there were groans from the large crowd assembled to watch it. A few seconds later, however, the clouds parted and we got a wonderful view. I remember very well that it seemed to get much colder during totality and an eery wind started to blow. Another thing is that all the birds thought it was night already and started to roost, although it was only around 11am.
You might think astronomers would be a bit indifferent to eclipses because they are well understood and totally predictable. But to experience an eclipse in person has a very powerful effect (or did on me anyway). We may be scientists but we don’t respond entirely rationally to everything. Nor should we.
Here’s a (not very good) scan of a (slightly damaged) picture from that eclipse:
Anyway, tomorrow (i.e. 8th April 2024) the total solar eclipse crosses North America with parts of 15 states able to view it: the eclipse will first appear along Mexico’s Pacific Coast at around 11:07 a.m. PDT, then travel across a swath of the U.S., from Texas to Maine, and into Canada. About 31.6 million people live in the path of totality. The path will range between 108 and 122 miles wide. An additional 150 million people live within 200 miles of the path of totality.
Do make the effort to see it if you can. It’s a remarkable experience that will live long in your memory. But watch out for the cosmologists and druids!












