Weekly Update from the Open Journal of Astrophysics – 08/11/2025

Posted in OJAp Papers, Open Access, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on November 8, 2025 by telescoper

It’s Saturday again, so it’s time for the usual update of the week’s new papers at the Open Journal of Astrophysics. Since the last update we have published another five papers, which brings the number in Volume 8 (2025) up to 168, and the total so far published by OJAp up to 403.

The first paper this week is “Maximizing Ariel’s Survey Leverage for Population-Level Studies of Exoplanets” by Nicolas B. Cowan and Ben Coull-Neveu (McGill University, Canada). This article was published in the folder Earth and Planetary Astrophysics on Tuesday 4th November 2025; it discusses various different schemes to select the mission reference sample for a notional three year transit spectroscopy survey with the European Space Agency’s Ariel mission

The overlay is here:

 

You can find the officially accepted version on arXiv here.

The Fediverse announcement is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Maximizing Ariel’s Survey Leverage for Population-Level Studies of Exoplanets" by Nicolas B. Cowan and Ben Coull-Neveu (McGill University, Canada)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.146656

November 4, 2025, 5:08 pm 1 boosts 3 favorites

 

The second paper of the week is “A substellar flyby that shaped the orbits of the giant planets” by Garett Brown (U. Toronto at Scarborough, Canada), Renu Malhotra (U. Arizona, USA) and Hanno Rein (U. Toronto at Scarborough, Canada). This article was published on Wednesday 5th November 2025, also in the folder Earth and Planetary Astrophysics. It argues that an ancient close encounter with a substellar object offers a plausible explanation for the origin of the moderate eccentricities and inclinations of the giant planets.

The overlay is here:

You can find the official version of this one on arXiv here. The federated announcement on Mastodon is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "A substellar flyby that shaped the orbits of the giant planets" by Garett Brown (U. Toronto at Scarborough, Canada), Renu Malhotra (U. Arizona, USA) and Hanno Rein (U. Toronto at Scarborough, Canada)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.146688

November 5, 2025, 8:34 am 3 boosts 3 favorites

Next one up is “The Potential Impact of Primordial Black Holes on Exoplanet Systems” by Garett Brown (U. Toronto at Scarborough), Linda He (Harvard U., USA),  and James Unwin (U. Illinois Chicago, USA). This one was also published on Wednesday 5th November 2025, but in the folder Astrophysics of Galaxies. This one is an exploration of the possibility that primordial black holes (PBHs) in our Galaxy, might impact the orbits of exoplanets. The overlay is here:

You can find the official accepted version on arXiv here. The fediverse announcement is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "The Potential Impact of Primordial Black Holes on Exoplanet Systems" by Garett Brown (U. Toronto at Scarborough), Linda He (Harvard U., USA), James Unwin (U. Illinois Chicago, USA)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.146689

November 5, 2025, 8:49 am 3 boosts 1 favorites

The fourth paper to report is “The Unhurried Universe: A Continued Search for Long Term Variability in ASAS-SN” by Sydney Petz, C. S. Kochanek & K. Z. Stanek (Ohio State U., USA), Benjamin J. Shappee (U. Hawaii, USA), Subo Dong (Peking University, China), J. L. Prieto (Universidad Diego Portales, Chile) and Todd A. Thompson (Ohio State U., USA). This one was also published on Wednesday November 5th 2025, but in the folder Solar and Stellar Astrophysics.  It describes the discovery and investigation of slowly-varying sources in the All Sky Automated Survey for SuperNovae (ASAS-AN) leading to the identification of 200 new variable stars. The overlay is here:

 

You can find the official published version on arXiv here. The Fediverse announcement follows:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "The Unhurried Universe: A Continued Search for Long Term Variability in ASAS-SN" by Sydney Petz, C. S. Kochanek & K. Z. Stanek (Ohio State U., USA), Benjamin J. Shappee (U. Hawaii, USA), Subo Dong (Peking University, China), J. L. Prieto (Universidad Diego Portales, Chile) and Todd A. Thompson (Ohio State U., USA)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.146690

November 5, 2025, 9:08 am 1 boosts 0 favorites

The fifth and final paper for this week is “Measuring the splashback feature: Dependence on halo properties and history” by Qiaorong S. Yu (Oxford U., UK) and 9 others based in the UK and USA. This was published on Friday 7th November 2025 in the folder Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics. It discusses how the properties of “splashback” features in halo profiles relate to the halo’s assembly history (e.g. mass accretion rate and most recent merger time). The overlay is here:

The officially accepted version can be found on arXiv here. The Fediverse announcement is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Measuring the splashback feature: Dependence on halo properties and history" by Qiaorong S. Yu (Oxford U., UK) and 9 others based in the UK and USA.

doi.org/10.33232/001c.146824

November 7, 2025, 9:12 am 0 boosts 0 favorites

That’s all the papers for this week. I’ll do another report next Saturday.

Euclid’s “Tuning Fork”

Posted in Euclid, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , on November 7, 2025 by telescoper

By way of a quick follow-up to yesterday’s post, here’s another Euclid Q1 product. This one is an updated version of the famous “Tuning Fork” representation of galaxy morphology:

Credits: Diagram: ESA/Euclid/Euclid Consortium/NASA, Diagram by J.-C. Cuillandre, L. Quilley, F. Marleau. Images alone: ESA/Euclid/Euclid Consortium/NASA, image processing by J.-C. Cuillandre, E. Bertin, G. Anselmi

You can click on the image to make it (much) bigger.

A galaxy’s structure is a sign of its formation history and the environment in which it resides. Since early on, astronomers have ordered galaxies according to their visible structure – as a basis to understanding the underlying physics: This panorama of galaxies’ structure shows the ‘classical’ morphological sequence from ellipticals (E, left) to lenticulars (S0) through spirals (S) to irregulars and dwarfs (right). The fork divides barred and unbarred spiral families: originally only SA (unbarred) and SB (barred) galaxies were arranged in a ‘tuning fork’ layout, the addition of SAB (weakly barred) galaxies as a third branch is making this term increasingly challenging to use. Lowercase letters a to d indicate progressively later spiral stages (tighter to looser arms), the trailing m (e.g., SAm) denotes Magellanic, very-late-type systems (patchy, often one-armed). The Milky Way is classified as an SBc galaxy.

Below the main sequence there are three auxiliary panels showing objects not represented in the fork: (1) spiral galaxies seen edge-on, with varying bulge-to-disk ratios and warps; (2) interacting and merging galaxies illustrating gravitationally driven morphological change; and (3) the morphological diversity of dwarf galaxies.

You can read more about this image and the other Q1 results here. You can also find an interactive version of the plot here.

Euclid and the Dark Cloud

Posted in Art, Euclid, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , on November 6, 2025 by telescoper

I haven’t posted anything recently about the European Space Agency’s Euclid mission, but I can remedy that by passing on a new image with text from the accompanying press release. This is actually just one of a batch of new science results emerging from the first `Quick Release’ (Q1) data; I blogged about the first set of Q1 results here.

Incidentally, I find the picture is very reminiscent of a famous painting by James McNeill Whistler.

Image description: The focus of the image is a portion of LDN 1641, an interstellar nebula in the constellation of Orion. In this view, a deep-black background is sprinkled with a multitude of dots (stars) of different sizes and shades of bright white. Across the sea of stars, a web of fuzzy tendrils and ribbons in varying shades of orange and brown rises from the bottom of the image towards the top-right like thin coils of smoke.

Technical details: The colour image was created from NISP observations in the Y-, J- and H-bands, rendered blue, green and red, respectively.  The size of the image is 11 232 x 12 576 pixels. The jagged boundary is due to the gaps in the array of NISP’s sixteen detectors, and the way the observations were taken with small spatial offsets and rotations to create the whole image. This is a common effect in astronomical wide-field images.

Accompanying Press Release

The above view of interstellar gas and dust was captured by the European Space Agency’s Euclid space telescope. The nebula is part of a so-called dark cloud, named LDN 1641. It sits at about 1300 light-years from Earth, within a sprawling complex of dusty gas clouds where stars are being formed, in the constellation of Orion.  

This is because dust grains block visible light from stars behind them very efficiently but are much less effective at dimming near-infrared light.  

The nebula is teeming with very young stars. Some of the objects embedded in the dusty surroundings spew out material – a sign of stars being formed. The outflows appear as magenta-coloured spots and coils when zooming into the image.  

In the upper left, obstruction by dust diminishes and the view opens toward the more distant Universe with many galaxies lurking beyond the stars of our own galaxy. 

Euclid observed this region of the sky in September 2023 to fine-tune its pointing ability. For the guiding tests, the operations team required a field of view where only a few stars would be detectable in visible light; this portion of LDN 1641 proved to be the most suitable area of the sky accessible to Euclid at the time. 

The tests were successful and helped ensure that Euclid could point reliably and very precisely in the desired direction. This ability is key to delivering extremely sharp astronomical images of large patches of sky, at a fast pace. The data for this image, which is about 0.64 square degrees in size – or more than three times the area of the full Moon on the sky – were collected in just under five hours of observations. 

Euclid is surveying the sky to create the most extensive 3D map of the extragalactic Universe ever made. Its main objective is to enable scientists to pin down the mysterious nature of dark matter and dark energy. 

Yet the mission will also deliver a trove of observations of interesting regions in our galaxy, like this one, as well as countless detailed images of other galaxies, offering new avenues of investigation in many different fields of astronomy

In visible light this region of the sky appears mostly dark, with few stars dotting what seems to be a primarily empty background. But, by imaging the cloud with the infrared eyes of its NISP instrument, Euclid reveals a multitude of stars shining through a tapestry of dust and gas. 

Trouble at Astronomy Ireland

Posted in Biographical, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , on November 5, 2025 by telescoper

I couldn’t resist passing on an unsettling news item about Astronomy Ireland, an Irish Astronomy Club described on its website in the following terms:

Astronomy Ireland is a non profit organisation and the largest national astronomy club in the world relative to population.

The news item concerned revolves around founder and chairperson David Moore (left), who has been held personally liable for multiple employment rights breaches against a former manager, Sonya Martin, at Astronomy Ireland who said she was forced to quit due to a “toxic” work environment and alleged “serious financial irregularities”.

The astronomy club and four members of its management committee, including David Moore, have been ordered to pay nearly €11,000 to the ex-employee, Sonya Martin, after she complained of constructive dismissal to the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC).

Among the allegations reported were that Mr Moore was keeping funds meant for Astronomy Ireland:

David was taking the money and pocketing it as his own income, as opposed to it going back into the society,” Ms Martin said. “The attitude changed towards myself and Ms Doyle after that,” Ms Martin said.

No doubt the money was just “resting in his account”. I mentioned this story to colleagues in the Department and none was surprised, and many (unlike myself) had known about this case for some time. I’ll keep some of the comments to myself, but one said that they gave a lecture (for free, as we academics usually do) to Astronomy Ireland which was filmed without consent. David Moore then sold DVDs of the talk. Where the profits from this went, I have no idea.

These financial shenanigans are dodgy enough but there are some truly bizarre sections of the news report. Here is one:

As the hearings continued into 2025, Mr Moore made repeated objections to being attached personally to the claim, and told Mr Dolan he had not received hearing notifications.

“Emails are unreliable,” he said. When Ms Martin’s solicitor, Mr O’Connell said the notification was sent by post too, Mr Moore said: “The post is unreliable.”

Even stranger, if not directly relevant to the case of Mr Moore, is this:

During the June 2024 hearing, Ms Martin gave evidence that Astronomy Ireland’s office landlord approached her complaining about having to clean up after the junior administrator, Mr G, who was later dismissed.

“The final straw for the landlord was that he had to clean ejaculate from the bathroom after Mr G was in there,” Ms Martin added.

Ewww…

In the interest of full disclosure, I gave a talk to Astronomy Ireland in December 2019. I don’t remember if it was filmed nor whether DVDs were sold, but given what I know now I don’t think I’ll be accepting any more speaking invitations from that organisation.

Update: it seems DVDs of my talk were made and were on sale but are no longer available. They must have sold out.

Virtually in Chile

Posted in Maynooth, Open Access, Talks and Reviews with tags , , , on November 4, 2025 by telescoper

Today has been a very busy day. I had a one-hour lecture on Partial Differential Equations from 11-12 this morning and a two-hour lecture on Ordinary Differential Equations from 2-4 this afternoon. In between those instead of having a lunch break, I was virtually in Chile giving a talk via Teams about the Open Journal of Astrophysics at LISA 10. That is not LISA as in the Laser Interferometric Space Antenna, but LISA as in Library and Information Services in Astronomy. I was invited to attend this in person, and would have gone, had it not clashed with teaching, as I have never set foot in Chile nor anywhere else in South America.

The talk went well and I had a number of questions and comments.

I got up early this morning to publish a paper taking our total so far to 399. By an unfortunate coincidence there was some problem with the integration between Crossref and our Scholastica platform so the publication didn’t go through properly. When I returned after my afternoon lectures, however, I found that whatever the problem was, it had sorted itself out; the paper is here.

The last talk I gave of this kind was May 2025, and the slides for that talk indicate that OJAp had published 293 papers so we have published over 100 papers in the 6 months since then. Unless there is another glitch tomorrow I expect we’ll reach 400 in the morning.

Denario

Posted in The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , on November 3, 2025 by telescoper

I’ve been alerted (by one of the authors) to a paper in the computer science/artificial intelligence section on arXiv, called The Denario project: Deep knowledge AI agents for scientific discovery by Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro et al. The abstract follows:

We present Denario, an AI multi-agent system designed to serve as a scientific research assistant. Denario can perform many different tasks, such as generating ideas, checking the literature, developing research plans, writing and executing code, making plots, and drafting and reviewing a scientific paper. The system has a modular architecture, allowing it to handle specific tasks, such as generating an idea, or carrying out end-to-end scientific analysis using Cmbagent as a deep-research backend. In this work, we describe in detail Denario and its modules, and illustrate its capabilities by presenting multiple AI-generated papers generated by it in many different scientific disciplines such as astrophysics, biology, biophysics, biomedical informatics, chemistry, material science, mathematical physics, medicine, neuroscience and planetary science. Denario also excels at combining ideas from different disciplines, and we illustrate this by showing a paper that applies methods from quantum physics and machine learning to astrophysical data. We report the evaluations performed on these papers by domain experts, who provided both numerical scores and review-like feedback. We then highlight the strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of the current system. Finally, we discuss the ethical implications of AI-driven research and reflect on how such technology relates to the philosophy of science. We publicly release the code at this https URL. A Denario demo can also be run directly on the web at this https URL, and the full app will be deployed on the cloud.

arXiv:2510.26887

Here’s a random picture from the paper:

I haven’t had time to read the paper yet – it’s 270 pages long – but I’m sure it will provoke strong reactions both in favour and against the idea of an AI research assistant. Comments are welcome through the box below.

P.S. The name Denario appears to be derived from the Latin “denarius”, a coin roughly equivalent to a day’s pay for a skilled worker in the days of the Roman Empire. More amusingly, “denarius” is the origin of the Polari word “dinarly”, meaning “money”. If I get time I must generate a Polari version of this manuscript.

Weekly Update from the Open Journal of Astrophysics – 01/11/2025

Posted in OJAp Papers, Open Access, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on November 1, 2025 by telescoper

It’s time once again for the usual Saturday update of the week’s new papers at the Open Journal of Astrophysics (although a bit later in the day than usual). Since the last update we have published another two papers, which brings the number in Volume 8 (2025) up to 163, and the total so far published by OJAp up to 398.

The first paper this week is “Instability and vertical eccentricity variation in global hydrodynamic disk simulations” by Janosz W Dewberry (U. Mass. Amherst, USA), Henrik N. Latter and Gordon I. Ogilvie (U. Cambridge, UK) and Sebastien Fromang (U. Paris Saclay, France). This article was published in the folder Solar and Stellar Astrophysics on Tuesday 28th October 2025; it discusses the instabilities and eccentricity variations generated in numerical hydrodynamic simulations of accretion disks.

The overlay is here:

You can find the officially accepted version on arXiv here.

The Fediverse announcement is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Instability and vertical eccentricity variation in global hydrodynamic disk simulations" by Janosz W Dewberry (U. Mass. Amherst, USA), Henrik N Latter and Gordon I Ogilvie (U. Cambridge, UK) & Sebastien Fromang (U. Paris Saclay, France)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.146332

October 28, 2025, 9:43 am 2 boosts 0 favorites

The second (and last) paper of the week is “Fast X-ray Transient Detection with AXIS: application to Magnetar Giant Flares” by Michela Negro (Louisiana State University, USA) and 8 others based in the USA and Canada. This one was also published on Tuesday 28th October, but in the folder High-Energy Astrophysical Phenomena. It presents a feasibility study of detecting Magnetar Giant Flares with the Advanced X-ray Imaging Satellite (AXIS). The overlay is here:

You can find the official version of this one on arXiv here. The announcement on Mastodon is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Fast X-ray Transient Detection with AXIS: application to Magnetar Giant Flares" by Michela Negro (Louisiana State University, USA) and 8 others based in the USA and Canada

doi.org/10.33232/001c.146360

October 28, 2025, 10:02 am 1 boosts 1 favorites

It being a relatively slow week we didn’t reach the 400 mark as I thought we might, but we will probably get there next week. After 10 months of the year 2025, in which we have published 163 papers, a rough projection for the 2025 total is 195. We do have some extra papers up our sleeve, however, so we might well reach 200 for the year. We will find out soon enough!

Oíche Shamhna shona daoibh go léir!

Posted in Biographical with tags , on October 31, 2025 by telescoper

So we have arrived at October 31st, Hallowe’en or, in pagan terms, Samhain. This, a cross-quarter day – roughly halfway between the Autumnal Equinox and the Winter Solstice – represents the start of winter (“the dark half of the year“) in the Celtic calendar. Technically, Samhain is tomorrow, 1st November, but the Celtic practice of reckoning days from sunset to sunset makes this a moot point.

Samhain is pronounced something like “sowin”, with the “sow” as in a female pig. The h after the m denotes lenition of the consonant (which in older forms of Irish would have been denoted by a dot on top of the m) so, when followed by a broad vowel the m is pronounced like the English “w”; when followed by a slender vowel or none “mh” is pronounced “v” or in other words like the German “w” (which makes it easier to remember). The phrase Oíche Shamhna (the Eve of Samhain) is used for Hallowe’en; it contains the genitive form of Samhain.

Unfortunately I’m still struggling a bit with the after-effects of yesterday’s jab so have neither the time nor the energy for a long post today so instead, before I go for another nap, I’ll just share a a replica (from the National Museum) of an authentically carved turnip as was traditional in old times. I think it’s infinitely scarier than any of those namby-pamby pumpkins.

This one is even scarier!

Oíche Shamhna shona daoibh go léir!

Fifth Covid Booster

Posted in Biographical, Covid-19 with tags , , on October 30, 2025 by telescoper

Just for the record, today I had my 5th Covid-19 vaccination booster. As an Old, I get prompted by the HSE to get free Covid-19 boosters and winter ‘flu jabs so I booked an appointment at a local pharmacist as I did last year. In fact I went into work this morning to say farewell to newly-doctored Aoibhinn Gallagher, and walked to the pharmacy afterwards. I didn’t have to wait long and the vaccination itself only took a matter of minutes.

That makes seven Covid-19 jabs altogether for me: the initial vaccination was in two stages, and I have since had five boosters. All but one of these have been Pfizer; the other was Moderna.

On previous occasions of this type I’ve usually managed to arrange an afternoon free afterwards in case of any adverse reactions. That was easy this time because it is Study Week at Maynooth University so there are no lectures. I did feel a bit tired after the jab, and had a short nap this afternoon. I also seem to have developed a runny nose, which may or may not be a reaction to the injection, but I don’t think it’s very serious.

Update: 24 hours on, I’m still feeling the after-effects. Hopefully, I’ll be better by the weekend.

After Conferring

Posted in Biographical, Maynooth with tags , , on October 30, 2025 by telescoper
from left to right: Dr Neil Trappe (HoD, Physics); Dr John Regan; Dr Aoibhinn Gallagher; Dr Matthew Birney; Dr Hannah O’Brennan; me; Dr Jonivar Skullerud

Yesterday I attended a conferring ceremony at Maynooth which was a very special occasion because it involved the formal award of the PhD degree to Aoibhinn Gallagher whom I supervised. Two other research students from the Department of Physics got their PhDs yesterday too; Matthew Birney and Hannah O’Brennan. Matthew (ESO Garching) and Aoibhinn (Bielefeld) both now have postdoctoral positions in Germany, incidentally.

These events are not actually called Graduation Ceremonies here in Ireland but Conferring Ceremonies. I was impressed that the local suppliers of academic dress, Phelan Conan were able to supply the correct 1989 vintage DPhil gown from Sussex University as opposed to the less interesting modern one. I would have worn it for the picture above, but by the time we found Hannah to take the photo I had already returned it to the supplier. Here are two more with myself in the gown and mortarboard:

You can see a picture of me wearing the same sort of gown in Brighton back in 1989, when I was a skinny young queen, here. I’ll add more pictures from yesterday if and when I get them.

As well as the PhDs we also saw the entire class of our MSc in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics get their degrees. I haven’t got any photographs of them, but will add any that I find. Here is a photograph of them outside the TSI building, courtesy of Jonivar Skullerud.

After the ceremony, those who got their degrees went for dinner with their respective parents, siblings and others who had come to attend the ceremony. We did meet up later on, however, in a local pub for a drink or several. In among all that I didn’t have time to write a post, bringing to an end a blogging streak of 109 days.

Graduation ceremonies are funny things. With all their costumes and weird traditions, they even seem a bit absurd. On the other hand, even in these modern times, we live with all kinds of rituals and I don’t see why we shouldn’t celebrate academic achievement in this way.

I like graduation ceremonies, actually. As each person walks across to be presented with their scroll you realize that every one of them has a unique story to tell and a whole universe of possibilities in front of them. How their lives will unfold no-one can tell, but it’s a privilege to be there for one important milestone on their journey, even those from other departments with whom you have had no contact at all.

I always find these ceremonies bittersweet occasions, though. There’s joy and celebration, of course, but these are tempered by the realization that many of the young people whom you’ve seen around long enough to grow accustomed to their faces, will disappear into the big wide world, in some cases never to be seen again. Although everyone is rightly proud of the achievement – either their own in the case of the graduands or that of others in the case of the guests – there’s also a bit of sadness to go with the goodbyes. It always seems that as a lecturer you are only just getting to know students by the time they graduate, but that’s enough to miss them when they go.

Anyway, all this is a roundabout way of saying congratulations once more to everyone who graduated yesterday, including Matthew, Hannah and Aoibhinn, and I wish you all the very best for the future!