Archive for Cosmology

Weekly Update from the Open Journal of Astrophysics – 15/11/2025

Posted in OJAp Papers, Open Access, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on November 15, 2025 by telescoper

It’s Saturday again, so it’s time for the usual update of the week’s new papers at the Open Journal of Astrophysics. It has been quite a busy week. Since the last update we have published another seven papers, which brings the number in Volume 8 (2025) up to 175, and the total so far published by OJAp up to 410.

First on the menu for this week is “Dynamical friction and measurements of the splashback radius in galaxy clusters” by Talia M. O’Shea (U. Wisconsin-Madison, USA), Josh Borrow & Stephanie O’Neil (U. Pennsylvania, USA) and Mark Vogelsberger (MIT, USA). Published on Tuesday 11th November in the folder Cosmology and NonGalactic Astrophysics, this one presents a study suggesting that dynamical friction does not play a major role in reducing the radius of the splashback feature in real data compared to numerical simulations.

The overlay is here:

You can find the officially accepted version on arXiv here.

The Fediverse announcement is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Dynamical friction and measurements of the splashback radius in galaxy clusters" by Talia M. O'Shea (U. Wisconsin-Madison, USA), Josh Borrow & Stephanie O'Neil (U. Pennsylvania, USA) and Mark Vogelsberger (MIT, USA)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.147125

November 11, 2025, 8:36 am 3 boosts 1 favorites

 

The second paper of the week is “Microlensing of lensed supernovae Zwicky & iPTF16geu: constraints on the lens galaxy mass slope and dark compact object fraction” by Nikki Arendse (Stockholm University, Sweden) and and international cast of 11 others based in Sweden, UK and France. This one was published on 11th November 2025 in the folder Astrophysics of Galaxies. It is about combining observations of two supernovae, iPTF16geu and SN Zwicky, with microlensing magnification maps to probe the properties of the lens galaxy.

The overlay is here:

 

You can find the official version of this one on arXiv here. The federated announcement on Mastodon is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Microlensing of lensed supernovae Zwicky & iPTF16geu: constraints on the lens galaxy mass slope and dark compact object fraction" by Nikki Arendse (Stockholm University, Sweden) and 11 others based in Sweden, UK and France

doi.org/10.33232/001c.147126

November 11, 2025, 8:53 am 1 boosts 1 favorites

 

Next one up is “Neutrino Constraints on Black Hole Formation in M31” by Yudai Sawa (U. Tokyo, Japan) and 11 others all based in Japan. This was published on Tuesday 11th November in the folder High-Energy Astrophysical Phenomena. It presents a calculation of the neutrino emission expected from the collapse of massive stars and its use in constraining black hole formation using neutrino detectors.

 

The overlay is here:

You can find the official accepted version on arXiv here. The fediverse announcement is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Neutrino Constraints on Black Hole Formation in M31" by Yudai Sawa (U. Tokyo, Japan) and 11 others all based in Japan

doi.org/10.33232/001c.147127

November 11, 2025, 9:04 am 0 boosts 1 favorites

The fourth paper this week is “Redshift Drift in Relativistic N-Body Simulations” by Alexander Oestreicher (U. Southern Denmark, DK), Chris Clarkson (QMUL, UK), Julian Adamek (U. Zürich, CH) and Sofie Marie Koksbang (U. Southern Denmark, DK). This one was published on Wednesday 12th November in the folder marked Cosmology and NonGalactic Astrophysics. It presents numerical calculations of the cosmological redshift drift effect for comparison with future surveys.

The overlay is here:

 

 

You can find the official published version on arXiv here. The Fediverse announcement follows:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Redshift Drift in Relativistic N-Body Simulations" by Alexander Oestreicher (U. Southern Denmark, DK), Chris Clarkson (QMUL, UK), Julian Adamek (U. Zürich, CH) and Sofie Marie Koksbang (U. Southern Denmark, DK)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.147178

November 12, 2025, 8:35 am 1 boosts 0 favorites

 

The fifth paper for this week is “Attributing the point symmetric structure of core-collapse supernova remnant N132D to the jittering jets explosion mechanism” by Noam Soker (Technion, Haifa, Israel). This one, published on Wednesday November 12th in the folder High-Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, presents a discussion of the morphology of a supernova remnant and possible explanation for it in terms of the explosion mechanism.

The overlay is here:

 

The officially accepted version can be found on arXiv here. The Fediverse announcement is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Attributing the point symmetric structure of core-collapse supernova remnant N132D to the jittering jets explosion mechanism" by Noam Soker (Technion, Haifa, Israel)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.147183

November 12, 2025, 8:46 am 1 boosts 0 favorites

The sixth paper to report this week is “Witnessing downsizing in the making: quiescent and breathing galaxies at the dawn of the Universe” by Emiliano Merlin (Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Italy) and an international cast of 20 others based in Italy, Germany, UK, USA, Switzerland, Spain and China. This one was published on Friday November 14th in the folder Astrophysics of Galaxies.

You can find the officially-accepted version on arXiv here. The fediverse announcement is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Witnessing downsizing in the making: quiescent and breathing galaxies at the dawn of the Universe" by Emiliano Merlin (Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Italy) and 20 others based in Italy, Germany, UK, USA, Switzerland, Spain and China

doi.org/10.33232/001c.147267

November 14, 2025, 8:38 am 1 boosts 1 favorites

And finally (for this week) we have “Beyond No No Tension: JWST z > 10 Galaxies Push Simulations to the Limit” by Joe McCaffrey (NUI Maynooth, Ireland), Samantha Hardin & John Wise (Georgia Institute of Technology, USA) and John Regan (Maynooth). This one was also published on Friday 14th November, in the folder marked Astrophysics of Galaxies. It asks the question whether newly-discovered high redshift galaxies are consistent with simulations of galaxy formation. The overlay is here:

You can find the officially acceopted version on arXiv here. The fediverse announcement is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Beyond No No Tension: JWST z > 10 Galaxies Push Simulations to the Limit" by Joe McCaffrey (NUI Maynooth, Ireland), Samantha Hardin & John Wise (Georgia Institute of Technology, USA) and John Regan (Maynooth)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.147278

November 14, 2025, 9:02 am 2 boosts 0 favorites

And that concludes the update for this week. There will be another next Saturday.

Weekly Update from the Open Journal of Astrophysics – 25/10/2025

Posted in OJAp Papers, Open Access, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on October 25, 2025 by telescoper

It may be a Bank Holiday weekend here in Ireland, but it’s still time for the usual Saturday update of the week’s new papers at the Open Journal of Astrophysics (although a bit later in the day than usual). Since the last update we have published another five papers, which brings the number in Volume 8 (2025) up to 161, and the total so far published by OJAp up to 396.

This week’s update  is rather unusual because there are four papers in a series (or, more precisely, mathematically speaking, a sequence) all published on the same day (Wednesday October 22nd 2025), in the same folder (Cosmology and NonGalactic Astrophysics), with the same first author (Dhayaa Anbajagane of the University of Chicago), with long author lists and many co-authors in common. These papers all relate to the DECADE cosmic shear project. Instead of doing them one by one, therefore, I’ve decided to put all four overlays together and provide links to all the papers afterwards. As I’m trying to encourage people to follow our feed on the Fediverse via Mastodon (where I announce papers as they are published, including the all-important DOI),  I’ll include links to each announcement there too.

  1. The DECADE cosmic shear project I: A new weak lensing shape catalog of 107 million galaxies“, accepted version on arXiv here.
  2. The DECADE cosmic shear project II: photometric redshift calibration of the source galaxy sample“, accepted version on arXiv here.
  3. The DECADE cosmic shear project III: validation of analysis pipeline using spatially inhomogeneous data“, accepted version on arXiv here.
  4. The DECADE cosmic shear project IV: cosmological constraints from 107 million galaxies across 5,400 deg2 of the sky“, accepted version on arXiv here.

The fediverse announcements follow:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "The DECADE cosmic shear project I: A new weak lensing shape catalog of 107 million galaxies" by Dhayaa Anbajagane (University of Chicago, USA) et al. (54 authors)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.146158

October 22, 2025, 12:42 pm 2 boosts 0 favorites

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "The DECADE cosmic shear project II: photometric redshift calibration of the source galaxy sample" by Dhayaa Anbajagane (University of Chicago, USA) et al. (53 authors)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.146159

October 22, 2025, 1:07 pm 2 boosts 0 favorites

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "The DECADE cosmic shear project III: validation of analysis pipeline using spatially inhomogeneous data" by Dhayaa Anbajagane (University of Chicago, USA) et al. (53 authors)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.146160

October 22, 2025, 1:57 pm 1 boosts 0 favorites

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "The DECADE cosmic shear project IV: cosmological constraints from 107 million galaxies across 5,400 deg^2 of the sky" by Dhayaa Anbajagane (University of Chicago, USA) et al. (75 authors)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.146161

October 22, 2025, 2:47 pm 1 boosts 0 favorites

 

The fifth and final paper for this week is “Clustering of DESI galaxies split by thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect” by Michael Rashkovetskyi of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, or CfA for short, and 48 others. This one was published on Wednesday 23rd October in the folder Cosmology and NonGalactic Astrophysics. This paper explores how the clustering properties of galaxies mapped by the Dark energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) relate to the local thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich emission mapped by the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT). The overlay is here:

The officially accepted version can be found on arXiv here, and the fediverse announcement is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Clustering of DESI galaxies split by thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect" by Michael Rashkovetskyi (Cfa Harvard-Smithsonian, USA) et al. (49 authors)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.146033

October 23, 2025, 8:28 am 1 boosts 0 favorites

 

That concludes the papers for this week. With one week to go and our total at 396, I still think we might reach the 400 total by the end of October.

On Cosmography (and going Mainstream)

Posted in Maynooth, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , on October 19, 2025 by telescoper

On Friday I attended a colloquium in the Physics Department at Maynooth University by Asta Heinesen of the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen. The talk had the title of Cosmography of the local Universe, as shown on the first slide:

Asta talked about a very interesting programme of work that takes a different approach from most of modern cosmology in that it avoids making the prior assumption of global homogeneity and isotropy embodied by the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric. In particular, instead of assuming the isotropic expansion of the Universe, it tries to determine its properties directly using only such measurements as luminosity distances and redshifts. This method is not entirely model-independent because it does assume Lorentz invariance and the conditions required for the Etherington Reciprocity Theorem to hold, but it does not assume any particular form of the metric, so can be applied on scales where the distribution of matter is inhomogeneous and isotropic, e.g. in our local neighbourhood.

To apply this “metric-free” idea one has to construct as general as possible description of the kinematic properties of the underlying matter flow, allowing the global expansion to be anisotropic, and for there to be both rotation and shear. Obviously one would need a large number of measurements to extract anything like a full description of the matter flow, so generally one is restricted to deriving the low-order multipoles (monopole. dipole and quadrupole) as well as the observer’s velocity with respect to the large-scale matter flow.

I found Asta Heinesen’s seminar very stimulating in itself, but it was also nice to see that one of the papers on which it was based is published in the Open Journal of Astrophysics:

When I checked it, I found it was published on my birthday! Here is the overlay:

I announced it on this blog here.

I freely admit that I feel quite proud to have played a small part in helping to get such interesting work published. I’m seeing more and more papers referenced like this, actually. I was reminded of the recent announcement of this year’s list of MacArthur Fellows. among them Kareem El-Badry who has published quite a few papers with the Open Journal of Astrophysics. His biography on the MacArthur Foundation page includes this:

He has published articles in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyThe Astrophysical Journal, and The Open Journal of Astrophysics, among other leading scientific journals.

I’m pleased to see us listed with the established names. I mention this just in case there are still people out there who think it might damage their career if they publish with a non-mainstream journal. We are mainstream now…

Everyone wants something better than ΛCDM

Posted in The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , on October 8, 2025 by telescoper

There’s a nice short review article on arXiv today by Mike Turner. I wasn’t going to share it because it hasn’t got any pictures in it, but changed my mind.

Here is the abstract

The current cosmological paradigm, ΛCDM, is characterized (b) its expansive description of the history of the Universe, its deep connections to particle physics and the large amounts of data that support it. Nonetheless, ΛCDM’s critics argue that it has been falsified or must be discarded for various reasons. Critics and boosters alike do agree on one thing: it is the not the final cosmological theory and they are anxious to see it replaced by something better! I review the status of ΛCDM, provide my views of the path forward, and discuss the role that the “Hubble tension” might play.

arXiv:2510.05483

To make up for the lack of pictures in the article, here’s the first image that came up when I did a search for “ΛCDM”:

Euclid Flagship 2 Update

Posted in Euclid, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , on September 22, 2025 by telescoper

I was thinking earlier today that it’s been a while since I last posted anything about the European Space Agency’s Euclid Mission but I’ve got an excuse to remedy that today because there is a brand new a press release about the Euclid Consortium’s Flagship 2 simulations, a (low-resolution) visual representation of one of which is shown above.

The news is that the largest ever synthetic galaxy catalogue is now public; a team of 8 institutions within the Euclid Consortium, led by the Institute of Space Sciences (ICE-CSIC) and the Port d’Informació Científica (PIC) in Barcelona have developed this `mock’ catalogue, which includes 3.4 billion galaxies, each with 400 modelled properties available for the scientific community. It was constructed to help analyse data from the Euclid mission, but has many other potential uses so is being shared otuside the Consortium.

You can read more about this catalogue, and also find out how the access the simulated catalogues, here. You could also read the scientific paper describing the flagship simulations here.

P.S. The first main data release from Euclid (known to its friends as DR1) will take please on October 21, 2026. That’s just 13 months away…

On Cosm(et)ology

Posted in Biographical, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , , on September 16, 2025 by telescoper

Every now and then I clean out my spam folder, usually finding a number of junk conference invitations. Most of them are tedious but sometimes I get a funny one that I post on here. The latest batch included this one.

I suppose the confusion between cosmology and cosmetology was to be expected at some point. I am of course something of an expert on ageing (sic), having managed to age quite considerably over the last 60-odd years. I also have a strong interest in the make-up of the Universe, especially through the foundations of physics. I’d even be tempted to attend the meeting were I not teaching on the dates concerned. I might reply suggesting they invite a colleague of mine here in Ireland, Dermot O’Logical.

Anyway, this gives me an excuse to post the following rehash of one of my old posts, this I one that dates from 2008..

–o–

When asked what I do for a living, I’ve always avoided describing myself as an astronomer, because most people seem to think that involves star signs and horoscopes. Anyone can tell I’m not an astrologer anyway, because I’m not rich. Astrophysicist sounds more impressive, but perhaps a little scary. That’s why I usually settle on “Cosmologist”. Grandiose, but at the same time somehow cuddly.

I had an inkling that this choice was going to be a mistake at the start of my first ever visit to the United States, which was to attend a conference in memory of the great physicist Yacov Borisovich Zel’dovich, who died in 1989. The meeting was held in Lawrence, Kansas, home of the University of Kansas, in May 1990. This event was notable for many reasons, including the fact that the effective ban on Russian physicists visiting the USA had been lifted after the arrival of glasnost to the Soviet Union. Many prominent scientists from there were going to be attending. I had also been invited to give a talk, the only connection with Zel’dovich that I could figure out was that the very first paper I wrote was cited in the very last paper to be written by the great man.

I think I flew in to Detroit from London and had to clear customs there in order to transfer to an internal flight to Kansas. On arriving at the customs area in the airport, the guy at the desk peered at my passport and asked me what was the purpose of my visit. I said “I’m attending a Conference”. He eyed me suspiciously and asked me my line of work. “Cosmologist,” I proudly announced. He frowned and asked me to open my bags. He looked in my suitcase, and his frown deepened. He looked at me accusingly and said “Where are your samples?”

I thought about pointing out that there was indeed a sample of the Universe in my bag but that it was way too small to be regarded as representative. Fortunately, I thought better of it. Eventually I realised he thought cosmologist was something to do with cosmetics, and was expecting me to be carrying little bottles of shampoo or make-up to a sales conference or something like that. I explained that I was a scientist, and showed him the poster for the conference I was going to attend. He seemed satisfied. As I gathered up my possessions thinking the formalities were over, he carried on looking through my passport. As I moved off he suddenly spoke again. “Is this your first visit to the States, son?”. My passport had no other entry stamps to the USA in it. “Yes,” I said. He was incredulous. “And you’re going to Kansas?”

This little confrontation turned out to be a forerunner of a more dramatic incident involving the same lexicographical confusion. One evening during the Zel’dovich meeting there was a reception held by the University of Kansas, to which the conference participants, local celebrities (including the famous writer William Burroughs, who lived nearby) and various (small) TV companies were invited. Clearly this meeting was big news for Lawrence. It was all organized by the University of Kansas and there was a charming lady called Eunice who was largely running the show. I got talking to her near the end of the party. As we chatted, the proceedings were clearly winding down and she suggested we go into Kansas City to go dancing. I’ve always been up for a boogie, Lawrence didn’t seem to be offering much in the way of nightlife, and my attempts to talk to William Burroughs were repelled by the bevy of handsome young men who formed his entourage, so off we went in her car.

Before I go on I’ll just point out that Eunice – full name Eunice H. Stallworth – passed away suddenly in 2009. I spent quite a lot of time with her during this and other trips to Lawrence, including a memorable day out at a pow wow at Haskell Indian Nations University where there was some amazing dancing.

Anyway, back to the story. It takes over an hour to drive into Kansas City from Lawrence but we got there safely enough. We went to several fun places and had a good time until well after midnight. We were about to drive back when Eunice suddenly remembered there was another nightclub she had heard of that had just opened. However, she didn’t really know where it was and we spent quite a while looking for it. We ended up on the State Line, a freeway that separates Kansas City Kansas from Kansas City Missouri, the main downtown area of Kansas City actually being for some reason in the state of Missouri. After only a few moments on the freeway a police car appeared behind us with its lights blazing and siren screeching, and ushered us off the road into a kind of parking lot.

Eunice stopped the car and we waited while a young cop got out of his car and approached us. I was surprised to see he was on his own. I always thought the police always went around in pairs, like low comedians. He asked for Eunice’s driver’s license, which she gave him. He then asked for mine. I don’t drive and don’t have a driver’s license, and explained this to the policeman. He found it difficult to comprehend. I then realised I hadn’t brought my passport along, so I had no ID at all.

I forgot to mention that Eunice was black and that her car had Alabama license plates.

I don’t know what particular thing caused this young cop to panic, but he dashed back to his car and got onto his radio to call for backup. Soon, another squad car arrived, drove part way into the entrance of the parking lot and stopped there, presumably so as to block any attempted escape. The doors of the second car opened and two policemen got out, kneeled down and and aimed pump-action shotguns at us as they hid behind the car doors which partly shielded them from view and presumably from gunfire. The rookie who had stopped us did the same thing from his car, but he only had a handgun.

“Put your hands on your heads. Get out of the car. Slowly. No sudden movements.” This was just like the movies.

We did as we were told. Eventually we both ended up with our hands on the roof of Eunice’s car being frisked by a large cop sporting an impressive walrus moustache. He reminded me of one of the Village People, although his uniform was not made of leather. I thought it unwise to point out the resemblance to him. Declaring us “clean”, he signalled to the other policemen to put their guns away. They had been covering him as he searched us.

I suddenly realised how terrified I was. It’s not nice having guns pointed at you.

Mr Walrus had found a packet of French cigarettes (Gauloises) in my coat pocket. I clearly looked scared so he handed them to me and suggested I have a smoke. I lit up, and offered him one (which he declined). Meanwhile the first cop was running the details of Eunice’s car through the vehicle check system, clearly thinking it must have been stolen. As he did this, the moustachioed policeman, who was by now very relaxed about the situation, started a conversation which I’ll never forget.

Policeman: “You’re not from around these parts, are you?” (Honestly, that’s exactly what he said.)

Me: “No, I’m from England.”

Policeman: “I see. What are you doing in Kansas?”

Me: “I’m attending a conference, in Lawrence..”

Policeman: “Oh yes? What kind of Conference?”

Me: “It’s about cosmology”

At this point, Mr Walrus nodded and walked slowly to the first car where the much younger cop was still fiddling with the computer.

“Son,” he said, “there’s no need to call for backup when all you got to deal with is a Limey hairdresser…”.

A Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Swampland

Posted in Maynooth, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , , on September 5, 2025 by telescoper

A very comprehensive review article has appeared on arXiv with the title Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Swampland: The Cosmologist’s Handbook to the string-theoretical Swampland Programme by Kay Lehnert (who just happens to be my PhD student). The paper is 170 pages long and contains over 1,800 references, which gives some idea of what a large field this is and how much work Kay has put into writing it!

This is Figure 3 from Kays paper. If you would like to know more of what it is about, turn to page 50…

The abstract reads

String theory has strong implications for cosmology: it tells us that we cannot have a cosmological constant, that single-field slow-roll inflation is ruled out, and that black holes decay. We elucidate the origin of these statements within the string-theoretical swampland programme. The swampland programme is generating a growing body of insights that have yet to be incorporated into cosmological models. Taking a cosmologist’s perspective, we highlight the relevance of swampland conjectures to black holes, dark matter, dark energy, and inflation, including their implications for scalar fields such as quintessence and axions. Our goal is to inspire cosmological model builders to examine the compatibility of effective field theories with quantum gravitational UV completions and to address outstanding cosmological tensions such as the Hubble tension. This comprehensive literature review presents clear definitions, cosmological implications, and the current status – including evidence and counterexamples – of the following swampland conjectures: the anti-de Sitter distance conjecture (AdSDC), the completeness conjecture (CC), the cobordism conjecture, the de Sitter conjecture (dSC), the swampland distance conjecture (SDC), the emergence proposal (EP), the Festina Lente Bound (FLB), the finite number of massless fields conjecture (or finite flux vacua conjecture (FFV)), the no global symmetries conjecture, the no non-supersymmetric theories conjecture, the non-negative null energy condition conjecture, the positive Gauss-Bonnet term conjecture, the species scale conjecture, the gravitino swampland conjecture (GSC), the tadpole conjecture, the tameness conjecture, the trans-Planckian censorship conjecture (tPCC/TCC), the unique geodesic conjecture, and the weak gravity conjecture (WGC), including the repulsive force conjecture (RFC).

This is essentially the literature review part of Kay’s thesis; the aim of his research is to study the implications of the string-theoretical swampland programme for cosmology. He’s particularly interested in the predictions string theory makes regarding inflation, dark energy, and dark matter, and the impact this has on the Hubble tension. The point of writing this review was to suggest projects that might be undertaken to bring string theory into the realm of testability, thus suppling material for the rest of Kay’s thesis, but I think it is also a very good guide for cosmologists of all types to what the swampland conjectures are and what they do and do not say about the Universe we actually live in.

A Primordial Black Hole?

Posted in The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , , on September 3, 2025 by telescoper

There’s a recent paper on arXiv with the title A direct black hole mass measurement in a Little Red Dot at the Epoch of Reionizationon by Juodžbalis et al. that is causing a lot of interest. The paper is here and the abstract is:

There is a discussion of this in the Grauniad here and in several other places on the interwebs. It comes hard on the heels of the theoretical paper announced here.

I only saw this paper yesterday and, now that I’ve read it, it isn’t really all that clear to me what this object is. No doubt there’ll be considerable follow-up. One possibility – and it is just a possibility – is that we are seeing evidence of a primordial black hole, called a PBH for short. These are black holes formed by direct collapse in the early Universe rather than by merging of stellar black holes. Note the use of the word “naked” is rather misleading. It does not mean a naked singularity, in the sense of a singularity without an event horizon around it. In this case it just means that it appears not to be surrounded by accreting material or even a host galaxy.

A PBH of mass M would form at a particular cosmic time t if a region of radiius ~ct (the cosmological horizon scale) collapses into a black hole. Obviously this would require a large fluctuation in density on that scale but if a PBH does form then its mass will be roughly the mass contained within the horizon, i.e. M ~ ρ(t) (ct)3 (ignoring dimensionless factors). The sort of mass required (~106 M) corresponds to a time when the Universe was radiation-dominated and before matter and radiation decoupled. What would be inside such a black hole is therefore predominantly trapped radiation, which is Quite Interesting, but as far as the outside universe is considered it’s just a massive black hole.

Graphic by European Space Agency showing how structure formation might be affected by PBH formation

Anyway, during radiation domination, the mass-energy density of the Universe ρ(t) ∝ t-2, so the horizon mass increases linearly with t. According to the standard cosmology, the epoch of radiation domination lasts for approximately 50,000 years after the Big Bang, i.e. of order 1012 seconds, and at the end of it the horizon mass is of order 1014 M. Assuming that the universe is completely radiation-dominated before that the time at which a PBH of mass 106 M would form is about 104 seconds, i.e. getting on for 3 hours after the Big Bang. This is after the end of cosmological nucleosynthesis, but not by much. Primordial black holes of lower mass than this would form earlier, with a stellar mass PBH having to collapse around the time of the quark-hadron transition. Lighter PBHs would form even earlier.

The numbers I’ve quoted are very approximate, back-of-the-envelope, ballpark guesstimates. For one thing not all of the horizon mass will end up in a PBH: energy may well be released during the collapse. Moreover, some PBHs on one scale will subsequently be subsumed within objects of larger mass. Also I’ve ignored quite a lot of numerical factors. All this will have to be worked out properly, but there are potential constraints on any physical processes that might give rise to PBHs on the relevant scale if they involve a release of significant amount of energy as there may not be time for this excess to be thermalized by scattering or they may intefere with the element abundances predicted by nucleosynthesis.

That is all assuming it is a primordial black hole in the first place…

Galaxies and Black Holes in the First Billion Years

Posted in Biographical, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , , on September 1, 2025 by telescoper

Trying to catch up on recent developments in galaxy formation? I can heartily recommend an excellent review article on the subject by Richard Ellis which you can find on the arXiv here. The abstract reads:

 I present written notes from three lectures given at the 54th Saas-Fee Advanced Course of the Swiss Society of Astrophysics and Astronomy in January 2025 entitled “Galaxies and Black Holes in the First Billion Years as seen by the JWST”. I focused my lectures on progress in studies of cosmic reionisation, the properties of galaxies in the reionisation era, topics related to the redshift frontier and the search for Population III stars. The lectures were given to graduate students in astrophysics and cover both pedagogical material as well as observational results from the first two and half years of JWST science operations. The pace of discovery with JWST is, of course, rapid and so my lectures discuss long-term goals, analysis methods and their assumptions and limitations in the hope that the underlying material will retain value in the near future. In this written version, the visual material is that presented at Saas-Fee in January 2025 but I have provided updates on progress from the literature up to August 2025. The material is aimed at early career researchers and should not be considered as a scholarly review of the entire JWST literature on high redshift galaxies.

It’s quite a long article (65 pages) but nicely written and well worth reading, as it is full of information about recent advances as well as historical insights. Talking of which, there’s a picture on page 41 taken at a meeting in Durham in 1988 called The Epoch of Galaxy Formation that I attended while I was still a graduate student:

Richard Ellis himself is in the front row, left of centre with light-coloured trousers, checked shirt and hands in pockets. I’m in the picture too, but I’ll leave it up to you to find me!

A poll was held among the delegates at that meeting about various questions to do with galaxy formation. The majority opinions revealed by these votes nearly all turned out to be utterly wrong! That’s progress, I guess…

Weekly Update from the Open Journal of Astrophysics – 23/08/2025

Posted in OJAp Papers, Open Access, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on August 23, 2025 by telescoper

So it’s Saturday again, so it’s time for the usual update of papers published at the Open Journal of Astrophysics which I do every Saturday. Since the last update we have published six new papers, which brings the number in Volume 8 (2025) up to 122, and the total so far published by OJAp up to 357. As I mentioned here we have overtaken the total of 120 published in Volume 7 (2024) and are on track for in excess of 180 publications in 2025.

The first paper to report this week is “Mass-feeding of jet-launching white dwarfs in grazing and common envelope evolution” by Noam Soker (Technion, Haifa, Israel). This was published on Tuesday 19th August in the folder Solar and Stellar Astrophysics. It proposes a theoretical suggestion about the production of jets in common-envelope evolution with massive stars.

The overlay is here:

You can make this larger by clicking on it, as you can with all the overlays below. The officially accepted version of this paper can be found on the arXiv here.

The second paper this week, published on Wednesday 20th August in the folder Earth and Planetary Astrophysics, is “Transition metal abundance as a key parameter for the search of Life in the Universe” by Giovanni Covone and Donato Giovannelli (University of Naples, Italy). This paper presents an argument that the availability of transition elements is an essential feature of habitability, and should be considered as such in selecting exoplanetary targets in the search for life.

The overlay is here:

You can find the officially accepted version of the paper on arXiv here.

The third paper this week, also published on 20th August 2025 in the folder Earth and Planetary Astrophysics, is “Discrete element simulations of self-gravitating rubble pile collisions: the effects of non-uniform particle size and rotation” by Job Guidos, Lucas Kolanz and Davide Lazzati (Oregon State University, USA).  This presents a new computer code for simulating the growth of granular masses through collisions of smaller particles and discusses results generated by it.

The overlay for this one is here:

You can find the officially accepted version on arXiv here.

The next paper, the fourth this week, is “Seeing the Outer Edge of the Infant Type Ia Supernova 2024epr in the Optical and Near Infrared” by W.B. Hoogendam (University of Hawaii, USA) and 32 others – too numerous to list by name – based in various institutes in the USA, Australia, UK, Denmark, Taiwan and China. This paper was also published on Wednesday 20th August 2025, but in the folder High-Energy Astrophysical Phenomena.  The article reports on the results of optical-to-near-infrared photometry and spectroscopy of the Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) 2024epr and a discusses how these challenge models for this sort of supernova.

The overlay is here:

You can find the officially accepted version on arXiv here.

The fifth paper this week is “Computing Nonlinear Power Spectra Across Dynamical Dark Energy Model Space with Neural ODEs” by Peter L. Taylor of Ohio State University (USA).  This one shows how to compute the evolution of cosmological power spectra into the non-linear regime via neural differential equations. It was published on Friday 22nd August 2025 in the folder Cosmology and NonGalactic Astrophysics. The overlay is here:

You can find the officially accepted version on arXiv here.

And finally for this week we have “Symbiotic star candidates in Gaia Data Release 3” by Samantha E. Ball & Benjamin C Bromley (University of Utah, USA) and Scott J. Kenyon (Smithsonian Observatory, USA). This paper was published on Friday 22nd August in the folder Solar and Stellar Astrophysics. It describes a new search for symbiotic star candidates in Gaia Data Release 3 (GDR3), based on astrometric, photometric, and spectroscopic information. The overlay is here:

You can find the officially accepted version of this one on arXiv here.

And that’s all the papers for this week. I suppose there will come a time when we publish a paper on every day of the week and each week’s summary will contain a paper in each of the astro-ph categories on arXiv, but we haven’t done that yet. This week we published on every day but Monday 18th August, and have papers in four of the six categories.