The strategic case for this Chair revolves around broader developments in the area of astrophysics and cosmology at Maynooth. Currently there are two groups active in research in these areas, one in the former Department of Experimental Physics (which is largely focussed on astronomical instrumentation) and the other, in the former Department of Theoretical Physics, which is theoretical and computational. We want to promote closer collaboration between these research strands. The idea with the new position is that the holder will nucleate and lead a research programme in the area between these existing groups as well as getting involved in outreach and public engagement.
It is intended that the position to appeal not only to people undertaking observational programmes using ground-based facilities (e.g. those provided by ESO, which Ireland recently joined), or those exploiting data from space-based experiments, such as Euclid, as well as people working on multi-messenger astrophysics, gravitational waves, and so on.
P. S. For those of you reading this from outside Ireland the job includes a proper public service pension, a defined benefit scheme way better than the UK’s USS.
What better way to start a cold February morning than with a lovely image from Euclid? The picture above on the left shows an image of the galaxy NGC 6505 and on the right a closer view of the central portion that reveals a near perfect Einstein Ring. This phenomenon is caused by gravitational lensing and is quite a rare occurrence because it requires a perfect alignment between a background source, a concentration of mass that acts as a lens, and the observer (in this case the Euclid telescope):
This find is all the more extraordinary because it was made using observations made during Euclid’s commissioning phase when the telescope was not yet fully focussed. The first release of (a small sample) of full-quality data from Euclid – the so-called Q1 release – will actually be announced next month.
The published paper by O’Riordan et al is available here, from which I have taken this image showing the two relationship between the two images above:
There has already been quite a lot of media coverage of this discovery (even in Ireland). Here is the Press Release from the European Space Agency explaining the background and some comments from people involved in the work:
–0–
Euclid blasted off on its six-year mission to explore the dark Universe on 1 July 2023. Before the spacecraft could begin its survey, the team of scientists and engineers on Earth had to make sure everything was working properly. During this early testing phase, in September 2023, Euclid sent some images back to Earth. They were deliberately out of focus, but in one fuzzy image Euclid Archive Scientist Bruno Altieri saw a hint of a very special phenomenon and decided to take a closer look.
“I look at the data from Euclid as it comes in,” explains Bruno. “Even from that first observation, I could see it, but after Euclid made more observations of the area, we could see a perfect Einstein ring. For me, with a lifelong interest in gravitational lensing, that was amazing.”
The Einstein Ring, an extremely rare phenomenon, turned out to be hiding in plain sight in a galaxy not far away. The galaxy, called NGC 6505, is around 590 million light-years from Earth, a stone’s throw away in cosmic terms. But this is the first time that the ring of light surrounding its centre is detected, thanks to Euclid’s high-resolution instruments.
The ring around the foreground galaxy is made up of light from a farther out bright galaxy. This background galaxy is 4.42 billion light-years away, and its light has been distorted by gravity on its way to us. The far-away galaxy hasn’t been observed before and doesn’t yet have a name.
“An Einstein ring is an example of strong gravitational lensing,” explains Conor O’Riordan, of the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Germany, and lead author of the first scientific paper analysing the ring. “All strong lenses are special, because they’re so rare, and they’re incredibly useful scientifically. This one is particularly special, because it’s so close to Earth and the alignment makes it very beautiful.”
Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity predicts that light will bend around objects in space, so that they focus the light like a giant lens. This gravitational lensing effect is bigger for more massive objects – galaxies and clusters of galaxies. It means we can sometimes see the light from distant galaxies that would otherwise be hidden.
If the alignment is just right, the light from the distant source galaxy bends to form a spectacular ring around the foreground object. These Einstein rings are a rich laboratory for scientists. Studying their gravitational effects can help us learn about the expansion of the Universe, detect the effects of invisible dark matter and dark energy, and investigate the background source whose light is bent by dark matter in between us and the source.
“I find it very intriguing that this ring was observed within a well-known galaxy, which was first discovered in 1884,” says Valeria Pettorino, ESA Euclid Project Scientist. “The galaxy has been known to astronomers for a very long time. And yet this ring was never observed before. This demonstrates how powerful Euclid is, finding new things even in places we thought we knew well. This discovery is very encouraging for the future of the Euclid mission and demonstrates its fantastic capabilities.
By exploring how the Universe has expanded and formed over its cosmic history, Euclid will reveal more about the role of gravity and the nature of dark energy and dark matter. The space telescope will map more than a third of the sky, observing billions of galaxies out to 10 billion light-years. It is expected to find around 100 000 strong lenses, but to find one that’s so spectacular – and so close to home – is astonishing. Until now, less than 1000 strong lenses were known, and even fewer were imaged at high resolution.
“Euclid is going to revolutionise the field, with all this data we’ve never had before,” adds Conor.
Although this Einstein ring is stunning, Euclid’s main job is searching for the more subtle effects of weak gravitational lensing, where background galaxies appear only mildly stretched or displaced. To detect this effect, scientists will need to analyse billions of galaxies. Euclid began its detailed survey of the sky on 14 February 2024 and is gradually creating the most extensive 3D map of the Universe yet. Such an amazing find, so early in its mission, means Euclid is on course to uncover many more hidden secrets.
About a year ago I wrote a couple of articles (here and here) in response to the discovery of a very large structure (“The Big Ring“) and claims that this structure and others – such as a Giant Arc – were inconsistent with the standard model of cosmology; the work concerned was later submitted as a preprint to arXiv. In my first post on the Big Ring I wrote
To assess the significance of the Big Ring or other structures in a proper scientific fashion, one has to calculate how probable that structure is given a model. We have a standard model that can be used for this purpose, but to simulate very structures is not straightforward because it requires a lot of computing power even to simulate just the mass distribution. In this case one also has to understand how to embed Magnesium absorption too, something which may turn out to trace the mass in a very biased way. Moreover, one has to simulate the observational selection process too, so one is doing a fair comparison between observations and predictions.
Well on today’s arXiv there is a preprint by Sawala et al. with the title aims to assess the significance of structures comparable to the Giant Arc. The title of the paper is The Emperor’s New Arc: gigaparsec patterns abound in a ΛCDM universe from which you can guess the conclusions. The abstract is
Recent discoveries of apparent large-scale features in the structure of the universe, extending over many hundreds of megaparsecs, have been claimed to contradict the large-scale isotropy and homogeneity foundational to the standard (ΛCDM) cosmological model. We explicitly test and refute this conjecture using FLAMINGO-10K, a new and very large cosmological simulation of the growth of structure in a ΛCDM context. Applying the same methods used in the observations, we show that patterns like the “Giant Arc”, supposedly in tension with the standard model, are, in fact, common and expected in a ΛCDM universe. We also show that their reported significant overdensities are an algorithmic artefact and unlikely to reflect any underlying structure.
arXiv:2502.03515
Here’s a picture of a large structure (a “Giant Arc”) taken from a gallery of such objects found in the simulations
I quote from the conclusions:
We hope that our results will dispel the misconception that no inhomogeneity can be found in the standard model Universe beyond some finite size. Instead, any given realisation of the isotropic universe comprises a time- and scale-dependent population of structures from which patterns can be identified on any scale.
We haven’t been able to make an appointment so far, despite trying! One of the reasons was undoubtedly that the two previous Departments of Theoretical Physics and Experimental Physics were in the throes of a merger and it was by no means certain at that time what the outcome of that process would look like in terms of the structure of the new Department. However, we now have a single Department of Physics so that at least is much clearer. So we’re trying again now.
The job announcement can be found here. It will appear on other sites shortly. Update: it is now on the Times Higher Jobs page here. The deadline is 31st March. I hope readers of this blog will help spread the news of this opportunity through their own networks.
The key rationale for these SALI positions is clear from the statement from Simon Harris, the (then) Minister responsible for Third Level education in Ireland:
“Championing equality and diversity is one of the key goals of my department. The Senior Academic Leadership Initiative (SALI) is an important initiative aimed at advancing gender equality and the representation of women at the highest levels in our higher education institutions.
We have a particular problem with gender balance among the staff in Physics in Maynooth, especially on the theoretical side, where all the permanent staff are male, and the lack of role models has a clear effect on our ability to encourage more female students to study with us.
The wider strategic case for this Chair revolves around broader developments in the area of astrophysics and cosmology at Maynooth. Currently there are two groups active in research in these areas, one in the former Department of Experimental Physics (which is largely focussed on astronomical instrumentation) and the other, in the former Department of Theoretical Physics, which is theoretical and computational. We want to promote closer collaboration between these research strands. The idea with the new position is that the holder will nucleate and lead a research programme in the area between these existing groups as well as getting involved in outreach and public engagement.
It is intended that the position to appeal not only to people undertaking observational programmes using ground-based facilities (e.g. those provided by ESO, which Ireland recently joined), or those exploiting data from space-based experiments, such as Euclid, as well as people working on multi-messenger astrophysics, gravitational waves, and so on.
Exciting as this position is in itself, it is part of wider developments and we are expecting to advertise further job opportunities in physics and astronomy very soon! I’d be happy to be contacted by any eligible person wishing to discuss this position (or indeed the general situation in Maynooth) on an informal basis:
P. S. For those of you reading this from outside Ireland the job includes a proper public service pension, a defined benefit scheme way better than the UK’s USS.
Some weeks ago I posted an item about recent results that have emerged from the DESI (Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument) Collaboration. I have been a bit busy since then but I just saw that there is one of those Cosmology Talks about these results which I thought I would pass on. The contributors are Arnaud de Mattia, Hector Gil-Marín and Pauline Zarrouk and they are talking about the analsysis they have done using the “full shape” of the galaxy power spectrum. It’s quite a long video, but very illuminating.
The Mayall Telescope at Kitt Peak, in which DESI is housed. This PR image was taken during a meteor shower, which is not ideal observing conditions. Picture Credit: KPNO/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/R. Sparks
I’ve just got time between meetings to mention that a clutch of brand new papers has emerged from the DESI (Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument) Collaboration. There is a press release discussing the results from the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory here and one from the ICCUB in Barcelona here; several members of the group I visited there during sabbatical are working on DESI. Congratulations to them.
I haven’t had time to read them yet, but a quick skim suggests that the results are consistent with the standard cosmological model.
The latest batch contains three Key Publications:
DESI Collaboration et al., DESI 2024 II: Sample Definitions, Characteristics, and Two-point Clustering Statistics
Findlay et al. (2024), Exploring HOD-dependent systematics for the DESI 2024 Full-Shape galaxy clustering analysis
The links lead to the arXiv version of these papers. These articles can also be found, along with previously released publications by the DESI Collaboration, here.
Anyone who has read the latest papers is welcome to comment through the box below!
It’s Saturday, so it’s time once again for another summary of business at the Open Journal of Astrophysics. This week I have three papers to announce, which brings the total we have published so far this year (Vol. 7) to 98 and the total published by OJAp to 213.
The second paper to present, also published on Tuesday 29th October 2024, is “Echo Location: Distances to Galactic Supernovae From ASAS-SN Light Echoes and 3D Dust Maps” by Kyle D. Neumann (Penn State), Michael A. Tucker & Christopher S. Kochanek (Ohio State), Benjamin J. Shappee (U. Hawaii), and K. Z. Stanek (Ohio State), all based in the USA. This paper is in the folder marked High-Energy Astrophysical Phenomena and it presents a new approach to estimating the distance to a source by combining light echoes with recent three-dimensional dust maps with application to supernova distances.
The overlay looks like this:
You can read this paper directly on the arXiv here.
Last, but by no means least, comes “A deconstruction of methods to derive one-point lensing statistics” by Viviane Alfradique (Universidade Federal do Rio De Janeiro, Brazil), Tiago Castro (INAF Trieste, Italy), Valerio Marra (Trieste), Miguel Quartin (Rio de Janeiro), Carlo Giocoli (INAF Bologna, Italy), and Pierluigi Monaco (Trieste). Published in the folder marked Cosmology and NonGalactic Astrophysics, it describes a comparative study of different methods of approximating the one-point probability density function (PDF) for use in the statistical analysis of gravitational lensing.
Here is a screengrab of the overlay:
To read the accepted version of this on the arXiv please go here.
That’s it for this week. I hope to post another update next weekend, by when we might well have reached a century for this year!
I had a very busy day yesterday culminating in the Space Week event I blogged about a few weeks ago. There was a good attendance – lots of young kids as well as adults – and the lecture room was very full. We could probably have filled a much bigger room, actually, but had been moved to a smaller venue and had to close registrations very early to avoid having too many people. I’d guess we had about 350. My talk was the last one, and didn’t finish until 8.30 by which time I was definitely ready for a pint.
You can find the slides I used for my presentation, The Universe according to Euclid, here.
There was an official photographer there who took quite a few pictures but I haven’t seen any of them yet. I’ll post a selection if and when I get them.
We live in a cyclic universe of a sort because every few years somebody tries to resurrect the idea that dark matter is somehow related to primordial black holes, i.e. black holes formed in the very early stages of the history of the Universe so that they have masses much smaller than black holes formed more recently by the collapse of stars or the merger of other black holes. If it forms very early the mass of a PBH could in principle be very small, much less than a star or a planet. The problem with very small black holes is that they evaporate very quickly via Hawking Radiation so would not survive the 14 billion years or so needed to still be in existence today and able to be dark matter.
An idea that was used in the past to circumvent this issue was that something might stop Hawking Radiation proceeding to reduce the mass of a PBH to zero, leaving a relic of finite mass usually taken to be the Planck mass. The suggestion has returned in different (but still speculative) guise recently, fueling a number of media articles of varying degrees of comprehensibility, e.g. here. The technical papers on which these articles are based can be found here and here.
Fortunately, there is now one of those excellent Cosmology Talks explaining the latest idea of how Hawking Radiation might break down and what the consequences are for Primordial Black Holes as a form of Dark Matter.
A few months ago I posted an item about the release new results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI). That was then followed by a presentation explaining the details which you can find here to find out more about the techniques involved. At the time the new DESI results garnered a lot of media attention much of it about claims that the measurements provided evidence for “New Physics”, such as evolving dark energy. Note that the DESI results themselves did not imply this. Only when combined with supernova measurements did this suggestion arise.
Now there’s a new preprint out by George Efstathiou of Cambridge. The abstract is here:
Recent results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) collaboration have been interpreted as evidence for evolving dark energy. However, this interpretation is strongly dependent on which Type Ia supernova (SN) sample is combined with DESI measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) and observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation. The strength of the evidence for evolving dark energy ranges from ~3.9 sigma for the Dark Energy 5 year (DES5Y) SN sample to ~ 2.5 sigma for the Pantheon+ sample. Here I compare SN common to both the DES5Y and Pantheon+ compilations finding evidence for an offset of ~0.04 mag. between low and high redshifts. Correcting for this offset brings the DES5Y sample into very good agreement with the Planck LCDM cosmology. Given that most of the parameter range favoured by the uncorrected DES5Y sample is discrepant with many other cosmological datasets, I conclude that the evidence for evolving dark energy is most likely a result of systematics in the DES5Y sample.
Here are a couple of figures from the paper illustrating the difference in parameter constraints using the uncorrected (left) and corrected (right) Dark Energy (Survey) 5 year Supernova sample.
The y-axis shows a parameter wa, which is zero in the standard model with non-evolving dark energy; the non-zero value implied by the left hand panel using the uncorrected data.
Just as with the Hubble Tension I blogged about yesterday, the evidence for a fundamental revision of our standard model may be nothing of the sort but some kind of systematic error. I think we can expect a response from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) team. Grab your popcorn.
The views presented here are personal and not necessarily those of my employer (or anyone else for that matter).
Feel free to comment on any of the posts on this blog but comments may be moderated; anonymous comments and any considered by me to be vexatious and/or abusive and/or defamatory will not be accepted. I do not necessarily endorse, support, sanction, encourage, verify or agree with the opinions or statements of any information or other content in the comments on this site and do not in any way guarantee their accuracy or reliability.
In the Dark 