Archive for the The Universe and Stuff Category

Sunrise, Sunset, Solstice and Perihelion

Posted in The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , on January 2, 2026 by telescoper

I was on the train earlier today when I remembered that we are getting close to the time when Earth reaches its perihelion, i.e. the point in its orbit when it is closest to the Sun. This occurs at 17.15 GMT tomorrow (Saturday 3rd January 2026), in fact. At this time the distance from the Sun’s centre to Earth’s centre will be 147,099,894 km  This year, aphelion (the furthest distance from the Sun) is at 18.30 GMT on July 6th 2026 at which point the centre of the Earth will be 512,087,774 km from the centre of the Sun. You can find a list of times and dates of perihelion and aphelion for future years here.

Earth’s elliptical orbit viewed at an angle (which makes it look more eccentric than it is – in reality is very nearly circular).

At perihelion the speed of the Earth in its orbit around the Sun is greater than at aphelion (about 30.287 km/s versus 29.291 km/s). This difference, caused by the Earth’s orbital eccentricity, contributes to the difference between mean time and solar time which, among other things, influences the time of sunrise and sunset at the winter solstice that happened a couple of weeks or so ago.

Incidentally, although the Solstice took place on 21st December, it was not until the end of 2025 that we experienced the latest sunrise. The longest day means neither the latest sunrise nor the earliest sunset. The earliest sunset was actually on December 15th in Dublin.

It surprises me how many people think that the existence of the seasons has something to do with the variation of the Earth’s distance from the Sun, thinking that the closer to the Sun we get the warmer the weather will be. The fact that perihelion occurs in the depth of winter should convince anyone living in the Northern hemisphere that this just can’t be the case, as should the fact that it’s summer in the Southern hemisphere while it is winter in the North.

The real reason for the existence of seasons is the tilt of the Earth’s axis of rotation. I used to do a little demonstration with a torch – flashlight to American readers- to illustrate this when I taught first-year astrophysics. If you shine a torch horizontally at a piece of card it will illuminate a patch of the card. Keep the torch at the same distance but tilt the card and you will see the illuminated patch increase in size. The torch is radiating the same amount of energy but in the second case that energy is spread over a larger area than in the first. This means that the energy per unit area incident on the card is decreases when the card is tilted. It is that which is responsible for winter being colder than summer. In the summer the Sun is higher in the sky (on average) than in winter. From this argument you can infer that the winter solstice not the perihelion, is the relevant astronomical indicator of winter.

That is not to say that the shape of the Earth’s orbit has no effect on terrestrial temperatures. It may, for example, contribute to the summer in the Southern hemisphere being hotter than in the North, although it is not the only effect. The Earth’s surface possesses a significant North-South asymmetry: there is a much larger fraction of ocean in the Southern hemisphere, for example, which could be responsible for moderating any differences in temperature due to insolation. The climate is a non-linear system that involves circulating air and ocean currents that respond in complicated ways and on different timescales not just to insolation but to many other parameters, including atmospheric composition (especially the amount of water vapour).

The dates when Earth reaches the extreme points on its orbit (the apsides) are not fixed because of the variations in its orbital eccentricity so, in the short-term, the dates can vary up to 2 days from one year to another. The perihelion distance varies slightly from year to year too; it will be slightly larger next year than this year, for example. There is however a long-term trend for perihelion to occur later in the year. For example, in 1246, the December Solstice (Winter Solstice for the Northern Hemisphere) was on the same day as the Earth’s perihelion. Since then, the perihelion and aphelion dates have drifted by an average of one day every 58 years. This trend will continue, meaning that by the year 6430 the timing of the perihelion and the March Equinox will coincide, although I hope to have retired by then…

Lick Observatory Damaged

Posted in The Universe and Stuff with tags , , on December 30, 2025 by telescoper

I missed, until now, the news that on Christmas Day, high winds accompanying a violent storm seriously damaged the historic Lick Observatory.

The gales were strong enough to rip one of the shutters from the dome of the 36″ refracting telescope and send it crashing onto the roof of the adjacent building.

The Observatory remains closed to the public while the structural damage is assessed and repairs made. Fortunately it seems nobody was hurt and no instruments were affected.

Here’s a video of the detached shutter being removed

The Lick Observatory is located on Mount Hamilton near San Jose in California. A donation by San Francisco millionaire James Lick enabled the construction of the 36” (diameter) refractor, the most powerful telescope in the world at the time.  The Observatory was almost destroyed in 2020 by a wildfire, but the new incident is the most serious damage in its 137-year history.

As I blogged about here, the Lick Observatory played an important role in the development of our understanding of the large-scale structure of the Universe, specifically with the creation of the Lick galaxy survey prepared by Charles Donald Shane and Carl Alvar Wirtanen and published in 1967 (Publ. Lick. Observatory 22, Part 1). In my more poetic moments, the image on the left puts me in mind of W.B. Yeats: Had I the heavens’ embroidered cloths.

That catalogue was still proving a useful resource well into the 1990s; I was part of various analyses of it myself, starting with this paper from 1991. It was eventually superceded by the arrival of large-scale galaxy redshift surveys, but it remaining an amazing achievement.

The Lick Galaxy survey was not performed with the 36″ refractor mentioned above, however, but by twin 20″ Carnegie astrographic telescopes housed in a different dome. As far as I know, these were not damaged in the storm.

The Voice of Niels Bohr

Posted in History, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , on December 28, 2025 by telescoper

The other night I watched the 2023 film Oppenheimer on TV. I had seen it before, on a plane flight, and enjoyed it, though I thought it was overlong. Fortunately it was a long flight. Watching it again a couple of days ago reminded me of something that struck me first time, and that was the cameo performance by Kenneth Branagh as Niels Bohr. You can see him at the start of the trailer here:

Niels Bohr was born in Copenhagen, a place I visited many times in the past and can recognize the local accent, though had never heard the speaking voice of Niels Bohr himself. I was a underwhelmed by Branagh’s rendition because he doesn’t sound very Danish to me. I assumed that because it was a relatively small part, Branagh didn’t put much effort into it. He doesn’t look like Niels Bohr, either.

But what did Niels Bohr actually sound like? Here is a lecture by him given in 1957 so you can decide for yourself.

Having heard this recording I think Kenneth Branagh’s version is not too far off, in fairness, though there are clear vocal mannerisms he did not capture.

The thing that strikes me most about the lecture, however, is that his delivery is very pedestrian, not to say rambling. People say he was like that in ordinary conversation too…

Weekly Update from the Open Journal of Astrophysics – 27/12/2025

Posted in OJAp Papers, Open Access, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on December 27, 2025 by telescoper

I wasn’t planning to do another update this week but I thought it would be best to complete the publications for 2025  at the Open Journal of Astrophysics, so that I don’t have to do a bigger update in the new year, and I have a bit of time this morning, so here we go.

Since the last update we have published four papers which brings the number in Volume 8 (2025) up to 201. Adding the 12 papers in the Supplement, this brings the final total for the year up to 213, and the total so far published by OJAp up to 448. In 2023 we published just 50 papers, so we have more than quadrupled in two years.

The first paper this week is “Transverse Velocities in Real-Time Cosmology: Position Drift in Relativistic N-Body Simulations” by Alexander Oestreicher (University of Southern Denmark), Chris Clarkson (QMUL, UK), Julian Adamek (Universität Zürich, CH) and Sofie Marie Koksbang (U. Southern Denmark). This study uses a general relativistic N-body simulation code to explore how cosmological structures affect position drift measurements, a new method for studying cosmic structure formation and velocity fields. This was published on Tuesday 23rd December 2025 in the folder Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics.

The overlay is here:

 

You can find the officially accepted version on arXiv here and this is the announcement on Mastodon (Fediscience):

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Transverse Velocities in Real-Time Cosmology: Position Drift in Relativistic N-Body Simulations" by Alexander Oestreicher (University of Southern Denmark), Chris Clarkson (QMUL, UK), Julian Adamek (Universität Zürich, CH) and Sofie Marie Koksbang (U. Southern Denmark)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.154744

December 23, 2025, 9:33 am 1 boosts 0 favorites

 

The second paper of the week is “On the statistical convergence of N-body simulations of the Solar System” by Hanno Rein, Garett Brown and Mei Kanda (U. Toronto, Canada). This study presents numerical experiments to determine the minimum timestep for long-term simulations of the Solar System, finding that timesteps up to 32 days yield physical results.  It was published on Tuesday December 23rd in the folder Earth and Planetary Astrophysics.

The overlay is here:

 

You can find the official version of this one on arXiv here. The federated announcement on Mastodon is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "On the statistical convergence of N-body simulations of the Solar System" by Hanno Rein, Garett Brown and Mei Kanda (U. Toronto, Canada)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.154745

December 23, 2025, 9:50 am 6 boosts 9 favorites

Next, published on 24th December 2025 in the folder High-Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, we have “The explosion jets of the core-collapse supernova remnant Circinus X-1” by Noam Soker and Muhammad Akashi (Technion, Haifa, Israel). This paper suggests that the rings in the Circinus X-1 supernova remnant resulted from jet-driven explosions, supporting the jittering-jets explosion mechanism theory for core collapse supernovae.

The overlay is here:

The officially accepted paper can be found on arXiv here and the announcement on Mastodon is here

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "The explosion jets of the core-collapse supernova remnant Circinus X-1" by Noam Soker and Muhammad Akashi (Technion, Haifa, Israel)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.154770

December 24, 2025, 9:15 am 2 boosts 1 favorites

Finally for 2025 we have “Quantifying the Fermi paradox via passive SETI: a general framework” by Matthew Civiletti (City University of New York, USA). This was published on Wednesday 24th December in the folder Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics. The author uses SETI observations and the Drake Equation to calculate the probability of detecting at least one extraterrestrial signal, highlighting the model’s limitations and potential improvements. The overlay is here:

The officially accepted version can be found on arXiv here and the Mastodon announcement here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Quantifying the Fermi paradox via passive SETI: a general framework" by Matthew Civiletti (City University of New York, USA)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.154771

December 24, 2025, 9:27 am 1 boosts 1 favorites

And that concludes the updates for 2025. I’ll be back in a week with the first update of 2026, which will include the first paper(s) of Volume 9.

I’d like to thank everyone who has supported the Open Journal of Astrophysics this year – Editors, Reviewers, Authors and the excellent Library staff at Maynooth – and who have made it such a bumper year. In 2023 we published just 50 papers, so we have more than quadrupled in two years. How many will we publish in 2026?

The Winter Solstice 2025

Posted in Maynooth, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , on December 21, 2025 by telescoper
Sunlight at dawn on the Winter Solstice at Newgrange

Just a quick note to point out that the Winter Solstice in the Northern hemisphere happens today, Sunday 21st December 2025, at 15.03 UT (GMT).

In Dublin, sunrise yesterday (20th December) was at 8.37 am and sunset at 4.07 pm, while today the sunrise was at 8.38 am and sunset at 4.08 pm. Both sunrise and sunset happen later tomorrow than today, so the Solstice marks neither the latest sunrise nor the earliest sunset. We have to wait until January for the latest sunrise (8.40am) and the earliest sunset (4.06pm) actually happened over a week ago. The interval between the two events will, however, be about 2 seconds longer tomorrow than today; and yesterday the gap was about 4 seconds longer than today. Taking a day to be the interval between sunrise and sunset, today is the shortest.

For a full explanation of this, see this older Winter Solstice post.

P.S. In the Southern Hemisphere this is of course the summer solstice. In Australia it was marked by the ritual of a victory in the Ashes against England.

R.I.P. Yannick Mellier (1958-2025)

Posted in Euclid, R.I.P., The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , on December 21, 2025 by telescoper

Last night I received a message via the Euclid Consortium conveying the very sad news of the death, at the age of 67, of the French astrophysicist and cosmologist Yannick Mellier (pictured left). Among many other things, Yannick was the Euclid Consortium Lead in which role he took on enormous responsibility for getting the project started and, with his team, keeping everything running. His loss is incalculable.

Yannick’s research work focussed on cosmology and the search for dark matter using gravitational lensing. Back in 1987 he was part of the observational team that discovered the first giant arc produced by strong gravitational lensing. He also did pioneering work in the field of weaking gravitational lensing with the Canada-France Hawaii Telescope in that regard starting back in 2000.

For well over a decade now Yannick had been involved with the European Space Agency’s Euclid mission. He was a major force right from the beginning, making the proposal, and after it was accepted leading the Consortium assembled to bring the project into being, preparing for launch, and dealing with the first data. The Euclid Consortium is a huge collaboration and it is impossible to overestimate the scale of the task facing the Lead. The first full data release (DR1) from Euclid will take place towards the end of next year (2026). It is sad beyong words that he did not live to see this.

During the period when I was Chair of the Euclid Consortium Diversity Committee I had a number of interactions with Yannick, sometimes dealing with difficult and confidential matters. I found him to be a man of great wisdom and sensitivity. Despite having many other things to deal with, including a long-term illness, he was unfailingly supportive and his advice was always sound.

The following is an excerpt from the message sent out yesterday:

Yannick’s death leaves a huge void within the consortium and our community. Those of us who have been here the longest know how hard he worked to make the Euclid project a success. He became its embodiment, working tirelessly to ensure its success; we owe him an immense debt of gratitude, and we will surely have the opportunity to reflect in detail on all that we owe him.

Indeed. I hope the Euclid Consortium – and the international cosmological community generally – will, at some stage, organize an appropriate tribute to Yannick.

Rest in Peace, Yannick Mellier (1958-2025)

Ar dheis Dé go raibh a anam

Weekly Update from the Open Journal of Astrophysics – 20/12/2025

Posted in OJAp Papers, Open Access, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on December 20, 2025 by telescoper

Christmas is coming, but it’s still time for the usual update of the week’s new papers at the Open Journal of Astrophysics. Since the last update we have published two more regular papers, described below, which brings the number in Volume 8 (2025) up to 197, as well as the 12 papers in yesterday’s Supplement, and the total published for the year up to 209, and the total so far published by OJAp up to 444.

Please note that we will be pausing publishing activity from 24th December 2025 until Monday 5th January 2026. Submissions will remain open, but no more papers will be published in Volume 8 (2025) after Christmas Eve. We will resume in the New Year with Volume 9.

Now for this week’s update. Since I blogged about the contents of the Supplement yesterday I won’t repeat them here and will instead just include the two regular papers.

The first regular paper this week is “Optimal intrinsic alignment estimators in the presence of redshift-space distortions” by Claire Lamman (Harvard-Smithsonian CfA, USA), Jonathan Blazek (Ohio State U., USA) and Daniel J. Eisenstein (Northeastern U., USA). This was published on Monday December 15th 2025 in the folder  Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics. The authors present estimators for quantifying intrinsic alignments in large spectroscopic surveys intended to inprove the constraints they provide for weak gravitational lensing and other cosmological applications.

The overlay is here:

You can find the officially accepted version on arXiv here and this is the announcement on Mastodon (Fediscience):

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "Optimal intrinsic alignment estimators in the presence of redshift-space distortions" by Claire Lamman (Harvard-Smithsonian CfA), Jonathan Blazek (Ohio State U.) and Daniel J. Eisenstein (Northeastern U.); all based in the USA

doi.org/10.33232/001c.154373

December 15, 2025, 8:57 am 1 boosts 0 favorites

The second regular paper of the week is “What is the contribution of gravitational infall on the mass assembly of star-forming clouds? A case study in a numerical simulation of the interstellar medium” by Noé Brucy (Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France), Enrique Vázquez-Semadeni (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico), Tine Colman (Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France), Jérémy Fensch (Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France) and Ralf S. Klessen (Universität Heidelberg, Germany). This was published in the folder Astrophysics of Galaxies on Friday 19th December 2025. This paper describes research using numerical simulations to quantify how much of the mass inflow into a star-forming cloud is driven by the self-gravity of the gas and the gravity from the stellar disk.

The overlay is here:

You can find the official version of this one on arXiv here. The federated announcement on Mastodon is here:

Open Journal of Astrophysics

New Publication at the Open Journal of Astrophysics: "What is the contribution of gravitational infall on the mass assembly of star-forming clouds? A case study in a numerical simulation of the interstellar medium" by Noé Brucy (Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France), Enrique Vázquez-Semadeni (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico), Tine Colman (Lyon), Jérémy Fensch (Lyon) and Ralf S. Klessen (Universität Heidelberg, Germany)

doi.org/10.33232/001c.154637

December 19, 2025, 8:30 am 0 boosts 0 favorites

And that concludes the update for this week, which will be the last Saturday update for 2025.

Supplement to the Open Journal of Astrophysics – “Pulsar Science with the SKAO”

Posted in OJAp Papers, Open Access, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , , , , , , on December 19, 2025 by telescoper

It’s been a busy day at the Open Journal of Astrophysics as we’ve published 12 related papers in the form of our first ever Supplement; officially it is Vol. 8 Supplement Issue 1. The idea of a Supplement is to publish a set of related papers together. I imagine it might be of interest for publishing conference proceedings, etc.

The topic of this Supplement is Pulsar Science with the Square Kilometre Array Observatory and it includes updates to the Science Case for the SKAO, the previous version of which is 10 years old. All the papers are indendependently peer-reviewed, which took some organizing and a lot of time because many potential referees are themselves members of the SKA Pulsar Science Working Group! Anyway, the final versions of all the papers hit the arXiv this morning so I published them all today.

Rather than include all 12 papers in tomorrow’s Saturday update I decided just to show the overlay for the overview of the special issue, which is here:

The following paragraph describes the content of the supplement and includes links to the other 11 papers in the issue.

The large instantaneous sensitivity, a wide frequency coverage and flexible observation modes with large number of beams in the sky are the main features of the upcoming SKA observatory’s two telescopes, the SKA-Low and the SKA-Mid, which are located on two different continents. Owing to these capabilities, the SKAO telescopes are going to be a game-changer for radio astronomy in general and pulsar astronomy in particular. The eleven articles in this special issue on pulsar science with the SKA Observatory describe its impact on different areas of pulsar science. Phase 1 of the rollout of the SKAO telescope is likely to double the known pulsar population in new surveys described in the first three papers (Keane et al. 2025Abbate et al. 2025Bagchi et al. 2025). These new discoveries will improve our understanding of the dynamics, evolution and gas content of globular clusters and the black hole at the centre of the Milky Way galaxy apart from increasing the samples for each of different kinds of radio emitting neutron stars (Levin et al. 2025). The larger population sample will enhance our understanding of the magneto-ionic interstellar medium (Tiburzi et al. 2025Xu et al. 2025), the pulsar magnetosphere (Oswald et al. 2025) and pulsar wind nebulae (Gelfand et al. 2025). Moreover, the discovery of exotic neutron star systems will test gravity theory ever more stringently (Krishnan et al. 2025) and will probe fundamental physics at sub-atomic level (Basu et al. 2025). Finally, this enhanced sample is likely to make the sky portrait sharper in nano-Hertz gravitational waves impacting on our understanding of the Universe in a fundamental way (Shannon et al. 2025). In summary, the papers in this special issue describe the way the upcoming SKA Observatory’s telescopes address fundamental physics through the study of pulsars and gravitational waves.

How magnetism might make galaxies…

Posted in Biographical, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , on December 16, 2025 by telescoper

I saw mention of paper recently published in Nature Astronomy by Karsten Jedamzik, Levon Pogosian and Tom Abel with the title Hints of primordial magnetic fields at recombination and implications for the Hubble tension. It’s behind a paywall but there is a version available on the arXiv here. The abstract of the Nature Astronomy version looks like this:

This paper reminded me of a paper I wrote a long time ago (in 1991, when I was at Queen Mary) about primordial magnetic fields and galaxy formation. It had its origins in a lunchtime talk I gave which was based on an old paper from the 1970s by Ira Wasserman. All I did was go through the paper and add a few small comments to update it, including some more recent observational constraints and mentions of dark non-baryonic matter; the Wasserman paper was framed in a model in which all the matter in the Universe was baryonic.

Anyway, the talk went down quite well and I was encouraged to write it up. I did so, and submitted it to a journal (MNRAS). Not unreasonably, it was rejected on the grounds that it didn’t have sufficient original content. I therefore expanded the discussion and submitted it as a review article to Comments on Astrophysics. That journal is now defunct, but the paper can be found on NASA/ADS here. It’s even got some citations!

Here’s the title and abstract:

You can find the whole paper here:

You will see I was advocating a larger magnetic field than in the recent one, with a view to affecting galaxy formation directly rather than larger scale features of the Universe. An important point is that primordial magnetic fields can have a large effect soon after recombination, so they might play a role in the formation of galaxies at high redshift which we are struggling to explain. At least – unlike some of the more exotic explanations that have been proposed – we know that magnetic fields actually exist…

Everything is a Simple Harmonic Oscillator

Posted in mathematics, The Universe and Stuff with tags , , , on December 13, 2025 by telescoper

Anyone who has studied theoretical physics for any time will be familiar with the simple harmonic oscillator, which I will call the SHO for short. This is a system that can be solved exactly and its solutions can be applied in a wide range of situations where it holds approximately, e.g. when looking at small oscillations around equilibrium. I’ve often remarked in lectures that we spend much of our lives solving the SHO problem in various guises, often pretending that the difficult system we have in front of us can, if looked at in the right way, and with sufficient optimism, be approximated by the much simpler SHO. Cue the old joke that if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like nail…

That rambling prelude occurred to me when I found this little problem in some old notes. It is a cute mathematical result that shows that the Friedman equations that underpin our standard cosmological model can in fact be written in the same form as those describing a Simple Harmonic Oscillator. In what follows we take the cosmological constant term to be zero.

The resulting equation is the SHO equation if k>0. I’m not sure whether this result is very useful for anything, but it is cute. It also goes to to show that, if looked at in the right way, the whole Universe is a Simple Harmonic Oscillator!